Search

Collaboration between agencies, private groups, and citizens in the field of natural resource management is generally seen as a productive strategy in challenging management situations. Collaborative management is particularly appealing in efforts like farmland preservation, which depend for their success on local initiative and support. However, such partnerships may create new dilemmas about the appropriate use of information in management. This paper analyzes the use of information by 15 county-wide Farmland Preservation task forces in the state of Ohio, U.S.A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article reports that community-based organizations in the United States are working to promote healthy and affordable housing for all. Yet reduced government funding and increased competition for foundation support make it even harder to redress housing-based health disparities. In March 2005, the Alliance for Healthy Homes convened nearly 50 leaders from community groups around the country to plan how to work together to build a national monument for healthy homes in the face of political and funding challenges. The Alliance of Healthy Homes has now presented a plan for combining forces with the National Center for Healthy Housing to integrate research, policy, and practice into practical solutions for communities.

Testing sewage (wastewater-based surveillance, or WBS) for pathogens is an increasingly important tool for monitoring the health of populations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, some residential institutions including colleges, prisons, and skilled nursing facilities used facility-level wastewater data to inform their pandemic responses. To understand how these early adopters used WBS data in decision making, we conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with multiple decision makers at 6 residential institutions in the United States (universities, prisons, and nursing homes) encompassing a total of more than 70 000 residents and staff about interpretation, uses, and limitations of these data. We found that WBS data were used in extremely diverse ways. WBS combined with clinical surveillance informed a wide range of public health actions at residential institutions, including transmission reduction measures, public health communications, and allocation of resources. WBS also served other institutional purposes, such as maintaining relationships with external stakeholders and helping alleviate decision makers' pervasive stress. Recognizing these diverse ways of using WBS data can inform expansion of this practice among institutions as well as development of community-scale systems., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Health impact assessments (HIA) promote the consideration of health in a wide range of public decisions. Although each HIA is different, common pathways, evidence bases, and strategies for community engagement tend to emerge in certain sectors, such as urban redevelopment, natural resource extraction, or transportation planning. To date, a limited number of HIAs have been conducted on decisions affecting water resources and waterfronts. This review presents four recent HIAs of water-related decisions in the United States and Puerto Rico. Although the four cases are topically and geographically diverse, several common themes emerged from the consideration of health in water-related decisions. Water resource decisions are characterized by multiple competing uses, inter-institutional and inter-jurisdictional complexity, scientific uncertainty, long time scales for environmental change, diverse cultural and historical human values, and tradeoffs between private use and public access. These four case studies reveal challenges and opportunities of examining waterfront decisions through a "health lens". This review analyzes these cases, common themes, and lessons learned for the future practice of HIA in the waterfront zone and beyond.

High-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) in unconventional gas reserves has vastly increased the potential for domestic natural gas production. HVHF has been promoted as a way to decrease dependence on foreign energy sources, replace dirtier energy sources like coal, and generate economic development. At the same time, activities related to expanded HVHF pose potential risks including ground- and surface water contamination, climate change, air pollution, and effects on worker health. HVHF has been largely approached as an issue of energy economics and environmental regulation, but it also has significant implications for public health. We argue that public health provides an important perspective on policymaking in this arena. The American Public Health Association (APHA) recently adopted a policy position for involvement of public health professionals in this issue. Building on that foundation, this commentary lays out a set of five perspectives that guide how public health can contribute to this conversation.