Search

Since hemolytic reactions in patients after administration of plasma derivatives like immunoglobulins or coagulation factor preparations have been described, titers of anti-A and anti-B-antibodies have to be below defined levels for batch release of these plasma-derived therapeutic products according to the European Pharmacopoeia. We have summarized clinical relevance of AB0 antibodies in plasma derivatives and related legal issues in the European Union, United States of America, and Japan. We have also discussed potential approaches for the prevention of hemolytic side effects with feasible steps in preparation of plasma derivatives, viz., (1) selection of donors, (2) exclusion of "dangerous donors", (3) optimizing ratio of the types of plasma, (4) removal of antibodies, (5) production of blood-group-specific plasma derivatives, (6) rejection of batches of plasma derivatives with high titers of antibodies, and (7) crossmatching before administration. For harmonization of standards for anti-A and anti-B in plasma-derived therapeutics the regulators and manufacturers will have to realistically deal with complex clinical, practical, and economic issues.

Individuals whose RBCs are characterized as having a partial D phenotype may make anti-D if exposed to normal D+ RBCs; thus it is desirable that they be typed as D- should they require blood transfusion or Rh immune globulin (RhIG) prophylaxis. Further, use of different anti-D reagents by blood centers and transfusion services can account for FDA-reportable errors. For this study, anti- D reagents for use in tube tests were obtained from three U.S. manufacturers. They included three examples of IgM monoclonal anti-D blended with monoclonal IgG anti-D, one IgM monoclonal anti-D blended with polyclonal IgG anti-D, and two reagents formulated with human anti-D in a high-protein diluent. One anti- D formulated for use by gel column technology was also tested. Direct agglutination tests by tube or gel were strongly positive (scores 9-12), with partial D RBCs of types DII, DIIIa, DIIIb, and DIVa. No reagent anti-D caused direct agglutination of DVI type 1, DVI type 2, or DFR phenotype RBCs. One tube anti-D reagent formulated with an IgM monoclonal anti-D plus a polyclonal IgG anti-D failed to cause direct agglutination of DVa, DBT, and R(0)(Har) RBCs, while DVa RBCs reacted weakly with two high-protein reagents formulated with human IgG anti-D. In contrast, the anti-D used by gel column technology was strongly reactive (score 11) with DVa, DBT, and R(0)(Har) RBCs. The single monoclonal IgM-polyclonal IgG blended anti-D and the two high-protein reagents were also the only reagents that failed to react with R(0)(Har) RBCs by the IAT. Elimination of the test for weak D on all patient samples, using currently available FDA-licensed reagents, will ensure that partial D category VI (DVI) patients will type as D- for the purpose of RhIG prophylaxis and blood transfusion. However, RBCs of other partial D phenotypes will be classified as D+ in direct agglutination tests with some, if not all, currently available reagents. Testing donors for weak expression of D continues to be required, albeit that Rh alloimmunization by RBCs with a weak or partial D phenotype is uncommon. Further, because of differences in performance characteristics among FDA-approved reagents, conflicts between donor center D typing and transfusion service confirmatory test results are inevitable.