Search

Under‐representation of subgroups of the population in clinical trials has been and continues to be a problem despite goals of academia, industry, and government. Older adults are among the groups that are under‐represented in trials of medications that they are likely to receive once marketing approval has been received. Recent legislation that mandates that clinical trial participants be representative of patient population has been passed and creates hope that greater numbers of older adults will be enrolled in clinical trials and that they will be representative of "typical" geriatric patients. However, there is the need for collection of current data on disease prevalences with granularity as to age, gender, and race as well as geriatric co‐morbidities to assess the representativeness of clinical trial participants relative to patient populations. Consensus on definitions and collection of data relevant to geriatric patient populations are needed to evaluate effects of comorbidities, frailty, cognitive and physical function. There will also be a need for expansion of the geriatric research workforce, facilities for research both in academic centers but also in the community and long‐term care facilities, and for engagement with and involvement of communities that have been traditionally under‐represented to conduct clinical trials that enroll truly representative patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the U.S. Food & Drug Administration's (FDA) guidelines and potential actions to enhance older adult drug evaluation as of September 2024. Topics covered include potential solutions to the underrepresentation of older adult patients in new drug therapy evaluation, and the possible safety deficiency due to lack of a subgroup's information that could disapprove a drug for market access. Also noted is the Consolidated Appropriations Act's support of patient representation.

Purpose This project aimed to characterize the resources necessary for pharmacists to support the required steps for obtaining and handling investigational drugs outside of a study protocol in the individual patient and intermediate-size population Expanded Access Program (EAP) processes. The second aim was to characterize the types of EAP requests received. Summary This retrospective, single-center, observational study was performed by reviewing EAP requests initiated at Duke University Hospital (DUH) between August 1, 2017, and February 11, 2023. The annualized cost of unreimbursed EAP study services was projected to be approximately $196,500 at DUH for 2023. Of the 168 EAP requests submitted after the institutional policy requiring pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee approval was established, 162 (96.4%) were approved by the P&T committee. Conclusion Given the lack of published information on a pharmacist-led workflow related to EAP services, this study sought to share DUH's process for managing EAP requests. As there is no mechanism for reimbursement of EAP services, they can be difficult to manage given the labor resources required. Further work is needed to recoup unreimbursed investigational drug service labor costs to ensure compassionate use programs can be implemented in a manner that is financially sustainable for a health system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cancer can create a shield of suppressive innate immune cells that stop our body's natural defenses from tumors. VTX-0811 is a new drug that targets these cells and turns them from allies of cancer to fighters against it. Preclinical tests show that it works in the lab on human cells and tumors and is safe and efficacious in animals. The results are promising and pave the way for human trials to see if VTX-0811 can become a new powerful weapon against cancer. Omnipresent suppressive myeloid populations in the tumor microenvironment limit the efficacy of T-cell-directed immunotherapies, become more inhibitory after administration of T-cell checkpoint inhibitors, and are overall associated with worse survival of cancer patients. In early clinical trials, positive outcomes have been demonstrated for therapies aimed at repolarizing suppressive myeloid populations in the tumor microenvironment. We have previously described the key role of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) in maintaining an inhibitory state of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), most of which express high levels of PSGL-1. Here we describe a novel, first-in-class humanized high-affinity monoclonal antibody VTX-0811 that repolarizes human macrophages from an M2-suppressive phenotype towards an M1 inflammatory phenotype, similar to siRNA-mediated knockdown of PSGL-1. VTX-0811 binds to PSGL-1 of human and cynomolgus macaque origins without inhibiting PSGL-1 interaction with P- and L-Selectins or VISTA. In multi-cellular assays and in patient-derived human tumor cultures, VTX-0811 leads to the induction of pro-inflammatory mediators. RNAseq data from VTX-0811 treated ex vivo tumor cultures and M2c macrophages show similar pathways being modulated, indicating that the mechanism of action translates from isolated macrophages to tumors. A chimeric version of VTX-0811, consisting of the parental murine antibody in a human IgG4 backbone, inhibits tumor growth in a humanized mouse model of cancer. VTX-0811 is exceptionally well tolerated in NHP toxicology assessment and is heading into clinical evaluation after successful IND clearance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of pediatric dermatological conditions such as alopecia areata (AA), psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (AD), and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has significantly evolved with the introduction of biologics and small molecule targeted therapies. The advancement in understanding the immunopathogenesis of these chronic skin conditions has led to the development and approval of novel biologics and small molecule therapies. Initially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults, most of these therapies are now being evaluated in clinical trials for safety and efficacy in adolescents and children, expanding new treatment options for pediatric patients. The role of the FDA in drug approval is multifaceted from drug inception, ensuring that research, data, and evidence show that the proposed drug is effective and safe for the intended use. Objective: The goal of this review article is to provide an overview of the recently FDA-approved and potential biologic and oral small molecule therapies in clinical trials for AA, psoriasis, AD, and HS in pediatric patients. Methods: The search for this review included keywords in ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Google Scholar for the latest research and clinical trials relevant to these conditions and treatments without the PRISMA methodology. Results: For pediatric AA, ritlecitinib is FDA-approved, while baricitinib and updacitinib are in phase 3 clinical trials for pediatric approval. The FDA-approved drugs for pediatric psoriasis include secukinumab, ustekinumab, ixekizumab, etanercept, and apremilast. Other phase 3 clinical trials for pediatric psoriasis include risankizumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, brodalumab, and deucravacitinib. For pediatric AD, the FDA-approved drugs are dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib, with many other drugs in phase 3 trials. Adalimumab is an FDA-approved biologic for pediatric HS, with various clinical trials ongoing for adults. The approved biologics and small molecule therapies had higher efficacy and improved safety profiles compared to traditional medications. Conclusions: With numerous ongoing trials, the success of these clinical trials could lead to their inclusion in treatment guidelines for these chronic skin conditions. Biologics and small molecule therapies offer new avenues for effective disease management, enabling personalized therapeutic interventions and improving pediatric health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pharmaceutical regulation on a global scale is a complex process, with regulatory bodies overseeing various aspects, including licensing, registration, manufacturing, marketing, and labeling. Among these, the USFDA plays a crucial role in upholding public health. The pharmaceutical industry contributes significantly to well-being by developing and distributing therapeutic agents. The journey of evaluating new pharmaceuticals involves meticulous examination through several phases, from safety and efficacy assessments to toxicity evaluation. Drug approval involves submitting New Drug Applications (NDAs) to regulatory agencies like the USFDA and EMA. However, disparities in durations contribute to the phenomenon known as "drug lag." This lag refers to delays in a pharmaceutical product's availability in one market compared to another. Addressing this issue is crucial, given its impact on patient access to treatments. Method: This study aims to analyze the extent of drug lag, focusing on newly approved oncology targeted therapies in Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the European Union. Data for cancer treatments authorized by the USFDA, EMA, and SFDA from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2022, were collected from regulatory agency websites. The data sources included authorization letters, prescription information, and evaluation documents. We conducted a comparative assessment of drug lag for approved oncology targeted therapies between Saudi Arabia, the US, and the EU. Result: Our analysis identified 135 newly approved oncology-targeted drugs within the specified timeframe. Of these, 71 received approval in all three regions, while disparities were evident in others. The USFDA consistently had the highest number of approved drugs, with 98.5% of drugs initially approved there. In contrast, Saudi Arabia had the lowest number of approved drugs and a significantly longer median drug lag, indicating substantial delays in drug availability. Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of mitigating drug lag to enhance global healthcare outcomes and patient access to innovative therapies. Further research and collaborative efforts are essential to bridging these disparities and promoting equitable healthcare worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current regulatory path for new drug registration in East Asian countries has led to significant delay of the new medicines in these countries. A unified regulatory path and allowance of mutual usage of clinical data in East Asian countries would lead to cost saving in drug development and expedite the new drug registration in these countries. The objectives of the present analysis are to compare the approval dates of a selection of products developed by Pfizer in the United States and East Asian countries (China, Japan, Korea) and compare the pharmacokinetics and recommended doses of these products in East Asian countries. Eighteen products (20 drugs, 2 products with 2 combination drugs) with exposure data available in at least 2 of the 3 East Asian countries across different therapeutic areas were included in the analyses. The results showed that most products had delayed approval in East Asian countries (up to 8 years) after US or EU approval. No distinct differences were observed in the drug exposure and recommended doses for the selected products in East Asian countries. These results together with literature data of genetic similarity of the East Asian populations support the mutual usage of the clinical data in the East Asian countries for expedited regulatory submission and approval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic solution (brand name, MIEBO) was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED). Unlike most DED treatments, PFHO addresses evaporative DED, which represents the vast majority of DED cases. PFHO may function as a surrogate for the tear film's lipid layer, inhibiting evaporation. This article summarizes data – found via PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (May 30-1 September 2023) – surrounding PHFO and provides some considerations for its use. Preclinically, PFHO's unique molecular properties facilitate formation of a layer at the tear film's air-liquid interface and inhibit saline evaporation by 81%. These properties translate to improved clinical outcomes in DED: in phase 3 studies, 40% to 50% of PFHO-group patients had a ≥ 3-step total corneal fluorescein staining improvement at day 57, and approximately 60% of patients had ≥ 30% reduction in visual analog scale dryness scores, improvements that persisted to 52 weeks. Additionally, PFHO demonstrated a robust safety profile. PFHO is the first prescription eye drop that directly addresses hyperevaporation in DED. PFHO is poised to help fill the large unmet need of patients with evaporative DED, potentially improving patient outcomes and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: This open-label, phase 1/1b study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of fruquintinib in United States (U.S.) patients to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) established in China. Patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed on approved systemic therapy, were enrolled into 2 successive dose escalation cohorts, fruquintinib 3 mg (n = 7) or 5 mg (n = 7), orally, once daily (QD), 3 weeks on and 1 week off (3/1) with a 3 + 3 design followed by a dose expansion cohort at the RP2D 5 mg dose (n = 6). PK samples were collected on Days 1, 14, and 21 (Cycle 1). One of 6 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable patients in the 3 mg cohort had a DLT of grade 4 hypertension; there were no DLTs in the 5 mg cohort. The RP2D was confirmed to be 5 mg QD 3/1. All 20 patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event; grade ≥ 3 in 5 (71.4%; 3 mg dose) and 12 (92.3%; 5 mg dose) patients. Two patients had a confirmed partial response. After single and multiple doses, median peak plasma concentrations occurred at 2 h post-dose. Steady-state was achieved after 14 days of QD dosing with systemic exposure four-fold higher than that after a single dose. Fruquintinib was well tolerated, and the safety and PK profile at the 5 mg RP2D in U.S. patients with advanced solid tumors was consistent with dose-finding studies in China. Preliminary anticancer activity was observed. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03251378. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most common ocular surface disorders. All DED involves an imbalance between tear production and evaporation. Most cases of DED are driven by excessive evaporation, which is often associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). In evaporative DED, a deficient tear film lipid layer is believed to lead to increased tear evaporation, inflammation, and ocular surface damage. Most prescription treatments for DED address signs and symptoms by targeting tear production and/or inflammation, but they do not address excessive evaporation. Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic solution (MIEBO™; Bausch + Lomb) is a water-free, single-ingredient, preservative-free prescription eye drop that directly targets tear evaporation and is approved by the FDA to treat the signs and symptoms of DED. Results from preclinical studies indicate that PFHO has a high oxygen carrying capacity, may reduce friction on blinking, and spreads quickly over the tear film surface to form a monolayer that inhibits evaporation. These effects can lead to stabilization of the tear film to promote ocular surface healing. Further, PFHO was detected in tears for at least 6 hours in a rabbit pharmacokinetic study, and results indicate that it may improve lipid layer thickness and quality. In 2 pivotal phase 3 trials in patients with DED and clinical signs of MGD (GOBI [NCT04139798] and MOJAVE [NCT04567329]), treatment with PFHO consistently met primary efficacy end points related to DED signs and symptoms (total corneal fluorescein staining and eye dryness, respectively) and was well tolerated. Compared with use of hypotonic saline solution, instillation of PFHO led to significant improvements in signs and symptoms in as early as 2 weeks. In a long-term, open-label safety extension study, efficacy of PFHO was sustained over 12 months, and the safety profile was consistent with those of previous studies. Clinical trial results indicate that treatment with PFHO effectively and consistently reduces the signs and symptoms of DED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This study is an analysis of the changes to workload and operations of UNC Health's investigational drug service (IDS) brought about by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods Workload statistics were collected and analyzed for trend changes to illustrate operational changes necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic within the IDS pharmacy at UNC Health. Results Multiple workload metrics declined at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by an increase in the metrics for many categories as the pandemic continued. Notably, monthly inventory added initially decreased by 37.5%, later leveling off but showing increased variability. Fills dispensed and monitoring visits both decreased by 34.5% from the first quarter (Q1) to Q2 of 2020. Both metrics returned to or slightly exceeded prepandemic levels by the end of the study period in March 2021. Patient enrollment decreased 76% from February to May 2020 before dramatically increasing in Q3 of 2020 and Q1 of 2021 with the initiation of COVID-19 vaccine studies. The average time to study startup increased for trials not related to COVID-19 and decreased for COVID-19–related trials. There has been no major impact on the number of open protocols throughout the course of the pandemic. Conclusion Despite initial decreases in workload following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, IDS operations returned to and, in some cases, exceeded prepandemic levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The early surge of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced a significant clinical challenge due to the high case-fatality rate in absence of evidence-based recommendations. The empirical treatment modalities were relegated to historical expertise from the traditional management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in conjunction with off-label pharmaceutical agents endorsed under the "emergency use authorization" (EUA) paradigm by regulatory agencies. This study was designed to evaluate the insights from the "fail-and-learn" strategy in 2020 before the availability of COVID-19 vaccines and access to reliable insights from high-quality randomized controlled trials. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, propensity-matched, case-control study was performed on a data registry comprising 186 hospitals from a national health care system in the United States, designed to investigate the efficacy of empirical treatment modalities during the early surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Reflective of the time-windows of the initial two surges of the pandemic in 2020, patients were stratified into "Early 2020" (March 1–June 30) versus "Late 2020" (July 1–December 31) study cohorts. Logistic regression was applied to determine the efficacy of prevalent medications (remdesivir, azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, tocilizumab) and supplemental oxygen delivery modalities (invasive vs. non-invasive ventilation) on patient outcomes. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Group comparisons were adjusted for covariates related to age, gender, ethnicity, body weight, comorbidities, and treatment modalities pertinent to organ failure replacement. Results: From a total of 87,788 patients in the multicenter data registry screened in this study, 9,638 patients were included who received 19,763 COVID-19 medications during the first two waves of the 2020 pandemic. The results showed a minimal, yet statistically significant, association with hydroxychloroquine in "Early 2020" and remdesivir in "Late 2020" with reduced odds of mortality (odds ratios 0.72 and 0.76, respectively; P = 0.01). Azithromycin was the only medication associated with decreased odds of mortality during both study time-windows (odds ratios 0.79 and 0.68, respectively; P < 0.01). In contrast, the necessity for oxygen supply showed significantly increased odds of mortality beyond the effect of all investigated medications. Of all the covariates associated with increased mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation had the highest odds ratios of 8.34 in the first surge and 9.46 in in the second surge of the pandemic (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This retrospective multicenter observational cohort study on 9,638 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 during revealed that the necessity for invasive ventilation had the highest odds of mortality, beyond the variable effects observed by administration of the prevalent EUA-approved investigational drugs during the first two surges of the early 2020 pandemic in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Demographic diversity among clinical trials is required for representing the real-world populations intended for treatment and disease prevention. Moreover, genetic and environmental differences between ethnic and racial groups necessitate appropriately powered trials for relevant subgroups. We investigate the racial and ethnic demographic diversity of US-based participants in GSK-sponsored interventional trials. We also assess the evaluation of demographic diversity against US Census and epidemiologic data. Methods: GSK-sponsored interventional phase I-IV clinical trials conducted from 2002 to 2019 across three areas were analyzed: pharmaceutical (includes therapeutic medicines except for vaccines and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)), vaccine (includes prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines), and ViiV (includes HIV therapies). A total of 1005 global trials encompassing 460,707 global participants were identified, of which 495 had US-based sites with a total of 108,261 (23.5% of global) US participants (pharmaceutical, n = 357 trials; vaccine, n = 45 trials; and ViiV, n = 93 trials). We evaluated how GSK US-based trial recruitment compares with US Census (in line with previously published studies from other groups) and with epidemiologic data. Results: GSK participant data for race and ethnicity combined across areas were generally similar to US Census levels (e.g. GSK versus census: White, 76.5% versus 76.3%; Black or African American, 15.1% versus 13.4%; Asian, 1.8% versus 5.9%; Hispanic or Latino, 14.0% versus 18.5%; Non-Hispanic White, 63.5% versus 60.1%). However, this was not the case for the individual pharmaceutical, vaccine, and ViiV data sets; least represented groups were Asian individuals for pharmaceutical and ViiV trials and American Indian or Alaskan Native individuals for vaccine trials (6.2%, 11.8%, and 11.1% of trials met/exceeded census level representation, respectively). The percentage of trials reaching/exceeding census levels also varied per trial phase for race and ethnicity. Furthermore, disparities in the percentage of trials reaching/exceeding census levels versus epidemiology-based prevalence levels have revealed opportunities to improve industry success metrics; in HIV trials, the proportion of Black or African American individuals (35.1%) exceeded census (13.4%) but not epidemiologic levels (55.3%). Conclusion: Further work is required to achieve demographic diversity across clinical trials. We conclude that US Census data are an inappropriate universal benchmark. A shift to epidemiology benchmarking will enable the consideration of global participants into US analyses for highly intrinsic (i.e. influenced by ancestry) diseases and more firm requirements for US-based participants into US analyses for extrinsic (i.e. influenced by location or culture) diseases. Benchmarking in line with epidemiologic data will allow us to set better trial enrollment goals, with the aim of conducting more demographically balanced, diverse, and representative clinical trials and enabling a better understanding of drug safety and efficacy per demographic group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing on ethical and legal frameworks in the Netherlands, the United States and France, we examine whether physicians are expected to inform patients about potentially relevant opportunities for expanded access to investigational drugs. While we found no definitive legal obligation, we argue that physicians have a moral obligation to discuss opportunities for expanded access with patients who have run out of treatment options to prevent inequality, to promote autonomy, and to achieve beneficence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This project aimed to retrospectively obtain, review, and extract key safety data from medical records of participants enrolled in RAMPART, the NIH-supported Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to ARrival Trial of intramuscular midazolam versus intravenous lorazepam for pre-hospital treatment of status epilepticus, to support a US new drug application (NDA) for intramuscular midazolam. Methods: A collaborative partnership was established between the NDA sponsor, the RAMPART trial lead academic institution, US government agencies, and contract research organizations to retrieve, review, and extract relevant safety data from the medical records of RAMPART participants and summarize those data to include in an NDA submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Results: Key data in the medical records of 890 RAMPART trial participants (1020 enrollments, including 130 repeat enrollments) were reviewed and extracted into a project database. Safety events occurred in 771 (86.6%) participants, and included additional information not collected in the RAMPART trial. This database also enabled subgroup analyses based on medical history and prior/concurrent medications, building upon previous analyses according to age, sex, and race. No previously unrecognized safety patterns were identified, and no association was observed between efficacy and medical history or medication usage. Conclusions: The use of unstructured real-world retrospective medical record data can effectively support an NDA submission in place of conducting another interventional clinical trial. This retrospective medical records review and extraction of additional safety data contributed to the FDA approval of intramuscular midazolam for the pre-hospital treatment of status epilepticus in 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00809146. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for the vast majority of cases of pancreatic cancer and is a lethal cancer that is often diagnosed as late-stage disease with a historically poor prognosis, as reflected in its status as the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To review the landmark clinical trials of approved chemotherapy regimens, immunotherapies, and targeted therapies for PDAC and discuss the notable investigational agents currently in clinical trials that have shown survival benefits in patients with PDAC. DISCUSSION: Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, have improved survival in phase 3 trials and are recommended as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. In patients with recurrent disease, salvage chemotherapy has either limited or conflicting data. Approved immunotherapies and targeted therapies include pembrolizumab, olaparib, and 3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and erlotinib), but all targeted therapies are limited in clinical use and are reserved for patient populations with specific genetic mutations. The therapeutic approaches currently in early-phase development for PDAC include dual immune checkpoint inhibition, monoclonal antibodies, cellular therapy, oncolytic adenoviruses, oligonucleotides, and multiple small-molecule inhibitors. Combinations of immunotherapies that target the programmed cell death (PD)-1 or PD ligand 1 are being explored in the induction and maintenance settings. Single agents under investigation are often combined with standard chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. The Precision Promise adaptive clinical trial platform is an innovative and efficient approach to testing multiple novel therapies simultaneously. CONCLUSION: Of the notable investigational agents for PDAC, early clinical data demonstrate improvements in tumor response and survival benefit in locally advanced or metastatic disease. Emerging immunotherapies and targeted therapies are at the forefront of drug development and may transform the approach to the treatment of patients with PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Semaglutide belongs to a class of medications known as glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists. It mimics the GLP‐1 hormone that is released in the gastrointestinal tract in response to eating. One role of GLP‐1 is to prompt the body to produce more insulin, which reduces blood glucose (sugar). GLP‐1 in higher amounts also interacts with the parts of the brain that reduce appetite and signal a feeling of fullness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What Is Known and Objective: Regulatory authorities in several regions have introduced a number of expedited programs (EPs) to promote the development of innovative drugs for patients in their own countries. The EPs in the United States (US), alone or in combination, have been successful in shortening the clinical development time in the US. We examined whether US‐EPs, as well as other related factors, have an impact on the clinical development time in Japan to obtain new insights for more efficient drug development. Methods: In total, 168 drugs approved as new molecular entities (NMEs) in Japan and approved in the US between 2012 and 2019 were surveyed. We compared the clinical development time in Japan for those drugs with or without US‐EPs. We also examined the impact of overlapping designations of US‐EPs on clinical development time in Japan. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify associated factors related to clinical development time in Japan, including US‐EPs. Results and Discussion: The clinical development time in Japan was significantly shorter at 37.4 [Interquartile range, IQR, 28.7–48.9] months for Accelerated Approval (AA), 42.2 [30.0–53.6] months for Breakthrough Therapy (BT), 42.3 [29.3–56.4] months for Fast Track (FT), 44.5 [30.7–60.0] months for US Priority Review, and 45.2 [31.3–61.8] months for US Orphan Designation. Multiple regression analysis revealed that AA (p = 0.008), FT (p = 0.013), Japan Priority Review, and the difference in development initiation dates between the US and Japan were significant factors related to a decrease in the clinical development time in Japan, whereas Japan Orphan Designation and the development of anticancer drugs were significant factors linked to an increase in the clinical development time. What Is New and Conclusion: US‐EPs were associated with a decrease in the clinical development time in Japan for the drugs that were approved as NMEs in Japan and approved in the US. This association was not restricted to particular therapeutic areas or development strategies. Stakeholders involved in drug development, including the drug developers and regulatory authorities in Japan, should realize these effects for efficient drug development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The low expectation of clinical benefit from phase 1 cancer therapeutics trials might negatively affect patient and physician participation, study reimbursement, and slow the progress of oncology research. Advances in cancer drug development, meanwhile, might have favourably improved treatment responses; however, little comprehensive data exist describing the response and toxicity associated with phase 1 trials across solid tumours. The aim of the study is to evaluate the trend of toxicity and response in phase 1 trials for solid tumours over time.Methods: We analysed patient-level data from the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored investigator-initiated phase 1 trials for solid tumours, from Jan 1, 2000, to May 31, 2019. We assessed risks of treatment-related death (grade 5 toxicity ratings possibly, probably, or definitely attributable to treatment), all on-treatment deaths (deaths during protocol treatment regardless of attribution), grade 3-4 toxicity, and proportion of overall response (complete response and partial response) and complete response rate in the study periods of 2000-05, 2006-12, and 2013-2019, and evaluated their trends over time. We also analysed cancer type-specific and investigational agent-specific response, and analysed the trend of response in each cancer type over time. Univariate associations of overall response rates with patients' baseline characteristics (age, sex, performance status, BMI, albumin concentration, and haemoglobin concentration), enrolment period, investigational agents, and trial design were assessed using risk ratio based on the modified Poisson regression model.Findings: We analysed 465 protocols that enrolled 13 847 patients using 261 agents. 144 (31%) trials used a monotherapy and 321 (69%) used combination therapies. The overall treatment-related death rate was 0·7% (95% CI 0·5-0·8) across all periods. Risks of treatment-related deaths did not change over time (p=0·52). All on-treatment death risk during the study period was 8·0% (95% CI 7·6-8·5). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological; grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 2336 (16·9%) of 13 847 patients, lymphopenia in 1230 (8·9%), anaemia in 894 (6·5%), and thrombocytopenia in 979 (7·1%). The overall response rate for all trials during the study period was 12·2% (95% CI 11·5-12·8; 1133 of 9325 patients) and complete response rate was 2·7% (2·4-3·0; 249 of 9325). Overall response increased from 9·6% (95% CI 8·7-10·6) in 2000-05 to 18·0% (15·7-20·5) in 2013-19, and complete response rates from 2·5% (2·0-3·0) to 4·3% (3·2-5·7). Overall response rates for combination therapy were substantially higher than for monotherapy (15·8% [15·0-16·8] vs 3·5% [2·8-4·2]). The overall response by class of agents differed across diseases. Anti-angiogenesis agents were associated with higher overall response rate for bladder, colon, kidney and ovarian cancer. DNA repair inhibitors were associated with higher overall response rate in ovarian and pancreatic cancer. The rates of overall response over time differed markedly by disease; there were notable improvements in bladder, breast, and kidney cancer and melanoma, but no change in the low response of pancreatic and colon cancer.Interpretation: During the past 20 years, the response rate in phase 1 trials nearly doubled without an increase in the treatment-related death rate. However, there is significant heterogeneity in overall response by various factors such as cancer type, investigational agent, and trial design. Therefore, informed decision making is crucial for patients before participating in phase 1 trials. This study provides updated encouraging outcomes of modern phase 1 trials in solid tumours.Funding: National Cancer Institute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tapinarof cream 1% (VTAMA®) is an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist that is being developed by Dermavant Sciences Inc. (a subsidiary of Roivant Sciences Inc.) as a once-daily topical treatment for plaque psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. AhR is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that has a role in immune-mediated skin responses. In May 2022, tapinarof cream 1% was approved in the USA for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults. Tapinarof cream 1% is also being investigated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tapinarof cream 1% leading to this first approval for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The "drug lag" (ie, the approval lag for new drugs) hinders patients' access to innovative new medicines. The drug lag was heavily debated in Japan from the late 2000s to the early 2010s. It consists of "development lag" (ie, the submission date lag for new drug applications) and "review lag" (ie, the difference in review periods). As the 2 lags have different causes and display significantly different recent trends in Japan, we focus on the development lag—in contrast with most previous literature—between Japan and the United States, based on a database we created for all new drugs from 2008 to 2018 using publicly available data sources. First, we found that Japan's development lag relative to the United States did not shrink in terms of the overall distribution rather than the median, which was the focus of most prior studies. Second, we examined the factors (product characteristics) that significantly affected the development lag and found that products that underwent multiregional clinical trials and those that were certified as "breakthrough therapies" in the United States had significantly shorter development lags with high robustness, whereas products receiving price premiums did not. Finally, we discussed the policy implications of these results. For instance, innovative new drugs that are presumed to receive price premiums require enhanced policy support for early application from the initial stages of clinical trials. It is also essential to promote information sharing regarding evaluations by foreign reviewing authorities for efficient use in the home country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Health-system pharmacists play a crucial role in monitoring the pharmaceutical pipeline to manage formularies, allocate resources, and optimize clinical programs for new therapies. This article aims to support pharmacists by providing periodic updates on new and anticipated novel drug approvals., Summary: Selected drug approvals anticipated in the 12-month period covering the second quarter of 2024 through the first quarter of 2025 are reviewed. The analysis emphasizes drugs expected to have significant clinical and financial impact in hospitals and clinics, as selected from 52 novel drugs awaiting US Food and Drug Administration approval. New cellular and gene therapies for cancers continued to strengthen the pipeline, in addition to new drugs targeting previously untreatable conditions. Several novel drugs are being developed for rare and ultra-rare diseases such as hemophilia, Niemann-Pick disease type C, hereditary angioedema, and aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency., Conclusion: The current drug pipeline includes new drugs with various indications for cancers and rare diseases as well as diabetes, acute coronary syndrome, chronic skin disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The article highlights the critical role that the investigational drug services (IDS) pharmacist plays in ensuring safe medical practices for patients receiving investigational medications. Topics include current gaps in investigational drug practices, IDS work group recommendations, and IDS participation in use of interactive response technology (IRT).

The article informs that companies seeking Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for their medical products are dramatically shifting human research overseas. It mentions FDA must use the funds solely for mutually agreed upon functions, predominantly speeding the pace of product approvals; and also mentions clinical trials offer the assessment of the efficacy and safety of new medical products.

We present a longitudinal analysis of investigational new drug applications (INDs) for new, systemic antibacterial drugs under active development between 1980 and 2019, evaluating the characteristics of these investigational drugs and the outcomes of these drug development programs. The number of INDs in active development declined by two-thirds, from 39 active INDs at its peak in 1987 to a low 13 in 2001, with decreased development of new cephalosporin, quinolone, and macrolide drugs and reduced participation from large pharmaceutical firms. Antibacterial drug development activity rebounded substantially from 2002 to 2009, primarily led by involvement of small pharmaceutical companies. As of 31 December 2019, the number of active INDs has declined to an 11-year low, and the number of antibacterial INDs initiated with the US Food and Drug Administration during 2010–2019 was lower than any of the previous 3 decades. Antibacterial drug development programs initiated in the 1980s and 1990s had high success rates, with >40% of INDs obtaining marketing approval, in a median time of about 6 years from IND receipt to approval. For drug development programs initiated between 2000 and 2009, we found that IND-to-approval rates reduced to 23%, with median development times for approved antibacterial drugs increasing to 8.2 years. The majority of INDs in development as of 31 December 2019 come from already established drug classes, most in early stages of development, and few are sponsored by large pharmaceutical companies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Expanded access is a treatment use of investigational drugs, biologicals or medical devices outside of clinical trials. The purpose of our study was to assess self‐reported conflicts of interest (COIs) in oncology expanded access studies. One hundred fifty‐eight oncology expanded access studies published from 2013 through 2020 were included. The pharmaceutical industry funded either completely or in part 94 studies (59.49%). The authors disclosed mostly financial COIs, while the number of the reported nonfinancial conflicts was relatively small (3528 and 57 COIs, respectively). The number of articles in which at least one author had a financial COI was 118 (74.68%). The most common financial COI types included advisory board membership/consulting (1471 COIs; 41.7%), followed by honoraria (570 COIs; 16.16%) and research funding (441 COIs; 12.5%). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of disclosing financial COIs and positive study's conclusions. On univariate analysis, financial COIs were more likely to occur in studies with at least one center located in the United States (odds ratio [OR], 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57‐35.98; P =.02). We also found that positive conclusions about the studied treatments were less likely in studies without industry funding (OR, 0.26; CI, 0.08‐0.77; P =.01). Most of the research on COIs in oncology performed to date focused on other types of studies, especially clinical trials. To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate COIs in oncology expanded access studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Health-system pharmacists play a crucial role in monitoring the pharmaceutical pipeline to manage formularies, allocate resources, and optimize clinical programs for new therapies. This article aims to support pharmacists by providing periodic updates on new and anticipated novel drug approvals., Summary: Selected drug approvals anticipated in the 12-month period covering the first quarter of 2024 through the fourth quarter of 2024 are reviewed. The analysis emphasizes drugs expected to have significant clinical and financial impact in hospitals and clinics, as selected from 59 novel drugs awaiting US Food and Drug Administration approval. This year's pipeline includes recently added drugs with various indications including oncology, infectious diseases, genetic disorders, and rare diseases. New cellular and gene therapies are rapidly evolving and being studied for several rare diseases and cancers., Conclusion: More oncology agents, including gene therapies, oral agents, and monoclonal antibodies, are in the pipeline this year. Additional diseases targeted by new novel drugs, including cellular and gene therapies, are hemophilia, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, Alzheimer's disease, and rare diseases such as galactosemia and epidermolysis bullosa., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose Results of the 2020 ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings pertaining to pharmacy operational changes implemented in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are presented. Methods Pharmacy directors at 1,437 general and children's medical/surgical hospitals in the United States were surveyed using a mixed-mode method of contact by email and mail. Survey completion was online. Results The response rate was 18.7%. Seventy-three percent of hospitals implemented changes to hospital units, including 46% that increased intensive care unit bed capacity; 94% made changes to pharmacy supply chain acquisition, changes to products, and/or increased inventory. Staffing changes were implemented by 69% of hospitals, with the most common being staffing reductions (55%) and salary reductions (16%). Medication-use changes were implemented by 86% of hospitals, with treatment guidelines for COVID-19 treatment (79%) and opening compassionate use or investigational drug studies (55%) being the most common. Changes in sterile compounding processes were implemented by 84% of hospitals. Personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages led to 71% of hospitals modifying PPE use standards in sterile compounding. Eighty-seven percent of hospitals changed operational activities, such as changing medication return practices (56%), medication reconciliation processes (46%), intravenous medication recycling (38%), and discharge counseling (37%). Hospitals experienced shortages of many medications, including albuterol inhalers (60%), sedatives and anesthetic agents (58%), neuromuscular blockers (43%), corticosteroids (34%), cardiovascular agents (24%), investigational agents (24%), and dialysis solutions (6%). Conclusion The pharmacy profession responded to myriad threats to operations and patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aducanumab (aducanumab-avwa; Aduhelm™) is a human, immunoglobulin gamma 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody directed against aggregated soluble and insoluble forms of amyloid β. It has been co-developed by Biogen and Eisai under license from Neurimmune for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. In June 2021, aducanumab received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. According to the US FDA prescribing information, treatment should be initiated in patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which treatment was initiated in clinical trials. There are no safety or effectiveness data on initiating treatment at earlier or later stages of the disease than were studied. Aducanumab is under regulatory review in Japan and in Europe. Its long-term safety and tolerability is being evaluated in a multinational phase 3b clinical study in patients with early Alzheimer's disease (mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease). This article summarizes the milestones in the development of aducanumab leading to this first approval for Alzheimer's disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During the pandemic in the spring of 2020 with no vaccine or treatment for SARS‐CoV‐2 and its associated disease, COVID‐19, convalescent plasma from recovered COVID‐19 (CCP) patients offered a potential therapy. In March 2020, the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized CCP under emergency Investigational New Drug (eIND) exemption and an IRB‐approved Expanded Access Program (EAP) to treat severe COVID‐19. Hospital demand grew rapidly in the Southeastern U.S., resulting in backlogs of CCP orders. We describe a large U.S. blood center's (BC) rapid implementation of a CCP program in response to community needs. Study design and methods: From April 2 to May 17, 2020, CCP was collected by whole blood or apheresis. Initial manual approaches to donor intake, collection, and distribution were rapidly replaced with automated processes. All CCP donors and products underwent FDA‐required screening and testing. Results: A total of 619 CCP donors (299 females, 320 males) presented for CCP donation (161 [25.7%] whole blood, 466 [74.3%] plasmapheresis) resulting in 1219 CCP units. Production of CCP increased as processes were automated and streamlined, from a mean of 11 donors collected/day for the first month to a mean of 25 donors collected/day in the subsequent 2 weeks. Backlogged orders were cleared, and inventory began to accumulate 4 weeks after project initiation. Conclusion: The BC was able to implement an effective de novo CCP collection program within 6 weeks in response to a community need in a global pandemic. Documentation of the experience may inform preparedness for future pandemics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Drug survival analysis of biologic agents in psoriasis is of extreme importance, as it allows not only the evaluation of objective clinical outcomes (such as effectiveness and safety) but also of factors that are associated with patients' adherence to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the drug survival of the most recent biologic agents approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis—ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab—and to identify clinical predictors that can influence the drug survival of these drugs. Methods: This retrospective multicentric cohort study from 16 dermatology centers in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Canada, and the United States included patients that started IL-12/23, IL-17 (IL-17A and IL-17R) and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019. Survival analysis was performed using a Kaplan-Meier estimator, to obtain descriptive survival curves, and proportional hazard Cox regression models. Results: A total of 3312 treatment courses (total patients: 3145) were included in the study; 1118 (33.8%) with an IL-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), 1678 (50.7%) with an IL-17 inhibitor [911 (27.5%) on secukinumab, 651 (19.7%) on ixekizumab, 116 (3.5%) on brodalumab], and 516 (15.5%) with an IL-23 inhibitor [398 (12.0%) on guselkumab, 118 (3.5%) on risankizumab]. At 18 months, the cumulative probability of survival was 96.4% for risankizumab, 91.1% for guselkumab, 86.3% for brodalumab, 86.1% for ustekinumab, 82.0% for ixekizumab, and 79.9% for secukinumab. Using ustekinumab as reference, drug survival of guselkumab was higher (HR 0.609; 95% CI 0.418–0.887) and that of secukinumab was lower (HR 1.490; 95% CI 1.257–1.766). In the final multivariable model, secukinumab, female sex, higher BMI, and prior exposure to biologic agents significantly increased the risk of drug discontinuation, whereas risankizumab was protective. Conclusion: In this multinational cohort with 8439 patient-years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of drug survival for all drugs was >79% at 18 months. Prescribed biologic, female sex, higher BMI, and previous exposure to biologic agents were predictors of drug discontinuation. Drug survival of guselkumab and risankizumab was higher than that of ustekinumab, and secukinumab was lower. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The federal Right-to-Try (RTT) Act created an alternate regulatory pathway for preapproval access to investigational drugs. A few studies have examined the experiences of physicians with the Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access Programs, but to our knowledge, no study has yet to examine their attitudes and experiences toward RTT.Methods: This study explored the views of 21 oncologists at a major cancer center with 3 main sites across the United States using semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis. Participants were selected to have experience with Expanded Access Programs.Results: Most oncologists had limited familiarity with RTT, and several reported confusion about the legislation, including whether patients have a right to investigational drugs and an obligation for companies to provide them. Although oncologists were interested in decreased regulatory burdens, 3 areas of concern were articulated: lack of safety and oversight, unclear structure and no provision for data collection, and potential heightening of patient expectations. Only 4 oncologists had experience discussing RTT, and none formally attempted to obtain the drug through this mechanism. Participants questioned the practicality of RTT legislation and suggested alternative ways to improve access.Conclusions: The study provides foundational empirical data underlying challenging ambiguities by experienced oncologists familiar with off-trial use of investigational therapeutics and reaffirms the role of physicians and regulatory bodies in mitigating the risks of investigational drugs. Our findings highlight the need for medical centers to inform oncologists about RTT and other preapproval pathways so that they are able to address questions from patients interested in nontrial investigational drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented the PDUFA V New Molecular Entity (NME) Program (the Program) in 2012 to promote greater transparency and increased communication between the FDA review team and applicants of NME New Drug Applications (NDA) and original Biologics License Applications (BLA). We reviewed 128 publicly available NME NDA and original BLA approval packages, submitted after October 2012 and approved by July 2018. Our research had a goal to educate regulatory professionals about the content and timing of communications from FDA to the Sponsor for approved drugs reviewed under the Program. This research found that communications issued within the first 74 days were consistent with the 21st Century Desk Reference Guide (DRG) targets; forecasted dates of other projected interactions included in the Filing Communication (FC) letter were often within 4 weeks of target. The content and format of the FC letter became more consistent with time, often including templated text. Approximately half the FC letters contained at least 1 filing review issue; however, not all appeared to be substantive. The FDA's preliminary comment on advisory committee meeting plans were predictive; 95% correlated with the need (or lack thereof) for an advisory committee meeting. Approximately 62% of FC letters contained actionable labeling comments, with nearly all related to editorial changes. With respect to the FC letter, this research found the DRG and relevant FDA Manual of Policies and Procedures to be reliable resources to predict the FDA's planned actions associated with the filing and review of a NME NDA or original BLA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assist nurses caring for hospitalized adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the authors synthesize evidence-based information on the disease, providing background on the epidemiology and history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causative virus. They also discuss the risks for severe effects of the illness, the multiple signs and symptoms hospitalized adults with COVID-19 may manifest, and the precautions hospitals should take to keep health care providers and patients safe during the course of this pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non-trial access to investigational drugs and purpose of the non-trial access system. All stakeholders and the public must understand the ethical issues associated with non-trial preapproval access systems. The current non-trial access programs in both countries depends on pharmaceutical companies' voluntary decisions about whether patients get access to investigational products. Moreover, the potential for inequity of access raises ethical concerns. Non-trial preapproval access is an exceptional way to practice medicine with various ethical and safety concerns, so we suggest that the scope and eligibility for using these pathways should thus be limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The orally active hypoxia inducible factor-proly hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor enarodustat (ENAROY®, Japan Tobacco) is being developed as an alternative to injectable erythropoietin stimulating agents such as epoetin and darbepoetin for the treatment of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The drug is approved in Japan and clinical development is ongoing in the USA and South Korea. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of enarodustat leading to this first approval for anaemia associated with CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Accelerated approval (AA) is a program that grants approval to drugs based on clinical trial data for a surrogate endpoint or an intermediate clinical endpoint. Pharmaceutical companies are required to conduct a confirmatory trial to demonstrate true clinical benefit of the drug to obtain full approval (FA) for the AA. This study aimed at clarifying the points that should be considered by examining the characteristics of AA indications in all disease areas and the factors related to the status of conversion from AA to FA. Methods: AA indications granted from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2016, were investigated from the aspects of the characteristics of AAs and the status of conversion from AA to FA. Results: Eighty-nine AAs were examined, of which 65 were converted to FA and 24 were not. A significant association was found between the FA status and period in which AA was granted, disease area, availability of IA data of a confirmatory trial for FA at the time of AA, and sales ranking of the company. Conclusions: To successfully convert from AA to FA, a development plan that focuses not only on AA but also on future FA needs to be considered and implemented from the early stage of development in line with the FDA guidance. In particular, for companies with insufficient experience in the development of AA indications and for products/indications without an established endpoint, more active discussion with the regulatory authorities from an early stage of development should be encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A veterinarian and pet owner survey (Project Jake) examined the use and safety of isoxazoline parasiticides given to dogs. Data were received during August 1–31, 2018 from a total of 2,751 survey responses. Forty‐two percent (1,157) reported no flea treatment or adverse events (AE), while 58% (1594) had been treated with some parasiticide for flea control, and of those that received a parasiticide, the majority, or 83% (1,325), received an isooxazoline. When any flea treatment was given, AE were reported for 66.6% of respondents, with no apparent AE noted for 36.1%. Project Jake findings were compared to a retrospective analysis of publicly available Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) reported AE. The number of total AE reported to FDA and EMA were comparable, although a 7 to 10 times higher occurrence of death and seizures was reported from the EMA or from outside the United States (US). Serious AE responses for death, seizures and neurological effects reported in our survey were higher than the FDA but moderately lower than the EMA reports. These sizable global data sets combined with this pre‐ and post‐parasiticide administration survey indicated that isoxazoline neurotoxicity was not flea‐ and tick‐specific. Post‐marketing serious AE were much higher than in Investigational New Drug (IND) submissions. Although the labels have recently been updated, dogs, cats and their caregivers remain impacted by their use. These aggregate data reports support the need for continued cross‐species studies and critical review of product labelling by regulatory agencies and manufacturers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers trends in antibacterial clinical development. It mentions Limited Population Pathway for Antibacterial and Antifungal Drugs as part of the 21st Century Cures Act, focused on approval of new agents specifically for use in patients with unmet medical needs; and also mentions need to buy access to new antibacterial agents as preparedness.

Background: Phase I oncology trials are often regarded as a therapeutic option for patients. However, such claims have relied on surrogate measures of benefit, such as objective response.Methods: Using a systematic search of publications, we assessed the therapeutic value of phase I cancer trial participation by determining the probability that patients will receive active doses of treatments that eventually receive FDA approval or a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommendation for their indication. ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology reports, NCCN guidelines, and Drugs@FDA were searched between May 1, 2018, and July 31, 2018. All statistical tests were 2-sided.Results: A total of 1000 phase I oncology trials initiated between 2005 and 2010 and enrolling 32 582 patients were randomly sampled from 3229 eligible trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 386 (1.2%) patients received a treatment that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for their malignancy at a dose delivered in the trial; including NCCN guideline recommendations, the number and proportion are 1168 (3.6%). Meta-regression showed a statistically significantly greater proportion of patients receiving a drug that was ultimately FDA approved in biomarker trials (rate ratio = 4.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53 to 13.23; P = .006) and single-indication trials (rate ratio = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.21 to 9.15; P  = .02); proportions were statistically significantly lower for combination vs monotherapy trials (rate ratio = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.68; P  = .02).Conclusions: One in 83 patients in phase I cancer trials received a treatment that was approved for their indication at the doses received. Given published estimates of serious adverse event rates of 10%-19%, this represents low therapeutic value for phase I trial participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Janus kinase (JAK) is a signal transducer and activator of a protein transcription system that transduces signals from cell surface cytokine and growth factor receptors to the nucleus. Recently developed JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) inhibit JAKs non-selectively or selectively and down-regulate the effects of corresponding ligands (i.e. cytokines and growth factors). JAKinibs are efficacious against rheumatoid arthritis and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and are being increasingly prescribed clinically. Regarding safety, JAKinib use is associated with common or unique changes in laboratory parameters; however, incidence rates of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these changes are low. Opportunistic and other infections, including tuberculosis, are the most critical ADRs of treatment with JAKinibs, and screening and monitoring of patients should be carefully performed. Incidence rates of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients receiving JAKinibs are high in Japan and Korea, and modestly high in other countries. Filgotinib may not be associated with an elevated risk for HZ, but long-term safety data are lacking. Data from clinical development programmes and post-marketing surveillance have indicated no increased risk for malignancy or serious cardiac events; however, long-term observational studies are necessary. Despite the non-elevated risk of gastrointestinal perforations, patients with older age and/or a history of diverticulitis or receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be carefully evaluated to determine the risk-benefit balance. The incidence rates of venous thromboembolism with all approved doses are similar to that expected in the population, although there are discrepancies in the placebo-controlled portion of the baricitinib clinical development programmes. Regulatory agencies in the USA and Europe suggested a higher risk for thrombotic events in patients receiving JAKinibs. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that dose adjustment should be considered for JAKinib use in patients with moderate-to-severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, depending on the metabolism of each drug. Long-term observational studies enrolling patients with diverse clinical backgrounds are required to strike a risk-benefit balance in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on improving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) has accelerated approval and expanded access pathways. Topics inlcude the patients living with a life-threatening disease and no meaningful treatment options, the COVID-19 pandemic response is something to behold, and unapproved products have been granted Emergency Use Authorization for clinical trials have been launched at a remarkable pace.

Botulism is an acute neuroparalytic affliction of the motor and autonomic neurons caused by the toxins produced from Clostridium botulinum and related bacterial strains. The botulinum neurotoxins, or BoNTs, consist of a phylogenetically diverse group of highly potent protein toxins. Current medical interventions for confirmed cases of botulism are limited to immediate administration of antitoxins and respiratory support. There is currently no licensed vaccine against botulism in the United States. The most widely distributed botulism vaccine was a pentavalent BoNT toxoid (PBT) against serotypes A-E administered until 2011 under an investigational new drug license. A binary vaccine composed of the recombinant, non-toxic, receptor binding domains (RBD) of serotypes/A1 and/B1 has completed a phase II clinical trial, but has yet to attain full licensure. We have previously published data demonstrating catalytically inactive, full length botulinum neurotoxin holoproteins (ciBoNT HPs) against serotypes/A1,/B1,/C1,/E1 and/F1 provide equivalent or superior potency against parental and dissimilar subtype toxins as compared the RBD vaccines. Here we describe the consistent potencies of the three independent lots each of ciBoNT/C1,/E1, and/F1 HPs against substantial monovalent challenges of the parental toxins. We also present data that a trivalent formulation of ciBoNT/C1,/E1 and/F1 (triCEF) maintains potency against both monovalent and polyvalent toxin challenges when stored as an adjuvanted vaccine at 4–8 °C for up to 2 years. • Consistent potency of three independent lots each of ciBoNT/C1,/E1 and/F1 vaccines. • A trivalent vaccine protects against both individual and combined toxin challenges. • A trivalent botulism vaccine stored at 4 °C maintains potency up to 2 years. • Receptor domain mutations increase safety index of atoxic BNT protein antigens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We describe here the case of a 40-year-old Nigerian male with severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria successfully treated with investigational intravenous (IV) artesunate. Summary: A 40-year-old Nigerian male was admitted to the medical intensive care unit for the treatment of severe malaria. The patient presented with the classic malaria paroxysm and altered mental status and was in acute renal failure. A blood parasite, thick and thin smear was performed revealing positive ring forms on smear which are characteristic of Plasmodium falciparum, with an estimated parasitemia of 2%. Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the recommended treatment for severe malaria is with IV quinidine, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication available for the treatment of severe malaria in the United States. However, quinidine was not immediately available, including from surrounding hospitals. As a result, the infectious diseases physician and pharmacist decided to contact the CDC to initiate the process for obtaining IV artesunate, an investigational drug only available via a FDA-approved Investigational New Drug (IND) protocol. Artesunate was flown into Houston later that night, and this drug was administered successfully to the patient. Patient responded to treatment and was discharged from the hospital on day 4. Conclusion: A patient with severe falciparum malaria was successfully treated with investigational artesunate procured from the CDC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Zanubrutinib (Brukinsa®), an orally-administered Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is being developed by BeiGene for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Zanubrutinib received accelerated approval in the USA on 14 November 2019 for the treatment of adult patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one prior therapy, based on overall response rate (ORR) seen in phase II and I/II clinical trials. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of zanubrutinib leading to this first approval for the treatment of MCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cenobamate (XCOPRI®) is an oral, small molecule neurotherapeutic azole compound that is being developed by SK Life Science Inc. and Arvelle Therapeutics for the treatment of epilepsy. Based on results of two pivotal phase 2 trials, cenobamate was recently approved in the USA for use in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adult patients. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of cenobamate leading to this first approval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The success of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a treatment for Clostrioides difficile infection (CDI) has stirred excitement about the potential for microbiota transplantation as a therapy for a wide range of diseases and conditions. In this article, we discuss vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT) as "the next frontier" in microbiota transplantation and identify the medical, regulatory, and ethical challenges related to this nascent field. We further discuss what we anticipate will be the first context for testing VMT in clinical trials, prevention of the recurrence of a condition referred to as bacterial vaginosis (BV). We also compare clinical aspects of VMT with FMT and comment on how VMT may be similar to or different from FMT in ways that may affect research design and regulatory decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]