Search

Importance: More people are surviving long-term after diagnosis with hematologic malignant neoplasm (HMN), yet there are limited data on cancer-related cognitive impairment in people with HMN. Better understanding cognitive outcomes after HMN in older adults is important for patient counseling and management., Objective: To model cognitive trajectories and rates of cognitive decline before and after HMN diagnosis in older adults compared with a matched noncancer cohort., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based cohort study, older adults from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) diagnosed with HMN between 1998 and 2016 after age 65 years were matched 1:3 to participants without cancer from the same HRS wave using propensity scores incorporating variables relevant to cognition. Cognitive trajectories were modeled with piecewise linear splines, and rates of cognitive decline before, during, and after diagnosis were compared in the 2 groups. Data were analyzed from April 2022 to April 2024., Exposures: HMN diagnosis by Medicare diagnosis codes., Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive function was assessed by the Langa-Weir cognitive summary score from 1992 to 2020. Sociodemographic and health-related variables relevant to cognition were incorporated into propensity scores., Results: At baseline, there were 668 participants in the HMN cohort (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [7.6] years; 343 [51.3%] male; 72 [10.8%] Black, 33 [4.9%] Hispanic, and 585 [87.6%] White) and 1994 participants in the control cohort (mean [SD] age, 76.5 [7.3] years; 1020 [51.2%] male; 226 [11.3%] Black, 91 [4.6%] Hispanic, and 1726 [86.6%] White). The HMN cohort consisted predominantly of more indolent diagnoses, and only 96 patients (14.4%) received chemotherapy. Before and in the 2 years around the time of diagnosis, the HMN and control cohorts had similar rates of cognitive decline. At 1 year postdiagnosis and beyond, the rate of cognitive decline was slower in the HMN cohort (-0.18; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.14) than in the control group (-0.24; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.23) (P = .02), but this difference was no longer significant after accounting for the competing risk of death (HMN group, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.19; control group, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.27; P = .48)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of older adults, the HMN and matched noncancer control cohorts had similar rates of cognitive decline before, during, and after diagnosis after accounting for the competing risk of death.

Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cancer, but there is little evidence evaluating the impact of polypharmacy and other medication hazards on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) outcomes. A small number of prior studies have evaluated the impact of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in the setting of alloHCT, with mixed results. We evaluated the effects of pre-alloHCT polypharmacy, PIM use, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) on post-alloHCT outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), hospital length of stay (LOS), number of non-hematologic grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) within 100 days after alloHCT, and number of readmissions within the first 100 days after alloHCT. The study population was a single-center prospective cohort of 148 patients ≥ 50 years of age. Pre-alloHCT medication lists were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record, including both scheduled and as-needed medications. PIMs were defined by a modified 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. DDIs were analyzed using Lexi-Interact. Polypharmacy was common in this population; the median number of medications was seven (range, 0 to 23). Fifty-two patients (35%) were prescribed nine or more medications, and 73 patients (49%) had at least one PIM prescribed. The median number of DDIs was three (range, 0 to 31), and the most common severity was major (48%). After adjusting for age and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index (HCTCI), both the number of all medications and number of scheduled medications were associated with inferior OS, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.12; P = .02) and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.15; P = .04), respectively. Receipt of nine or more scheduled medications was associated with inferior OS (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.32; P = .02). The number of PIMs was also significantly associated with OS (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.54, P = .05). After adjusting for age, HCTCI, and total number of medications, a greater number of DDIs were significantly associated with longer hospital length of stay (difference, 0.74 days; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.40, P = .03). In adjusted analyses, there were no significant polypharmacy-related predictors of NRM, LOS, or non-hematologic grade ≥3 AEs. These data demonstrate the utility of pre-alloHCT polypharmacy, PIM use, and DDIs as important prognostic factors and support routine pre-alloHCT medication review by physicians and pharmacists with a goal of appropriate de-prescribing where possible., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)