Search

Background: There is ongoing debate about surgery of primary site in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.Methods: 3919 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma identified in the SEER registry between 2004 and 2013. The benefit of surgery of primary nasopharynx tumor site on overall and cancer-specific survival was assessed by risk-adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and propensity score matching modeling.Results: Surgery was marginally associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.816, 95% CI 0.656-1.015, p = 0.07) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.749, 95% CI 0.552-1.018, p = 0.06) in the propensity score model. Among 398 cases who underwent primary site surgery, 282 (70.85%) received local tumor excision and 79 (20.31%) received pharyngectomy. Local tumor excision and pharyngectomy had almost the same effect on survival in propensity score matching analysis. The benefit was significant in subgroups of white, age <60 year, and patients with T3, N1, M0, AJCC stage III, or moderately differentiated tumors. Further survival analysis showed surgery to promote survival in both radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy patients.Conclusion: This is the first population-based analysis using propensity score model to provide evidence of a positive impact of surgery on survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Moreover, surgery demonstrated the significant benefit in subgroups of patients with specific clinical characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Recent research indicates a potential association between workplace violence and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the working-age population. However, the relevant evidence in the United States is sparse. Thus, this study was conducted to explore the possible relationship between workplace violence and CVD among United States workers., Methods: We utilized cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, which included a representative sample of 18 380 workers, to investigate the associations between workplace violence and the prevalence of CVD using logistic regression. Workplace violence was determined based on self-reported threats, bullying, or harassment at work over the past 12 months, supplemented with additional information regarding frequency. CVD included all forms of heart disease and stroke., Results: A total of 1334 workers reported experiences of workplace violence, and 1336 workers were diagnosed with CVD. After adjustment for covariates, participants who reported any instance of workplace violence had significantly higher odds of having CVD (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 2.30) than those who reported no such violence. Furthermore, the highest odds of CVD (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.63) were observed among those frequently exposed to workplace violence. Even occasional exposure to workplace violence was associated with 74% excess odds of CVD., Conclusions: Our study indicates an association between workplace violence and CVD in United States workers, exhibiting a dose-response pattern.