Search

Introduction: Neoadjuvant therapy has become standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. It is correlated with improved clinical and pathological outcomes, including significant tumor downstaging and organ preservation in certain patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which has become the standard for pre-operative staging, is also used for clinical and pre-operative restaging following pre-operative treatment. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the concordance between restaging MRI (following the completion of neoadjuvant therapy) and postoperative pathology result. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies reporting restaging MRI results compared to pathological outcomes. Outcomes included tumor and nodal staging, circumferential resection margin (CRM) and pathological complete response (pCR). Results: Out of 25,000 studies found on the initial search; 33 studies were included. The studies were published between 2005 and 2023 and included 4100 patients (57.14% males). The median age was 62.45 years. The median interval between the conclusion of neoadjuvant treatment and the subsequent restaging MRI was 6 weeks (range 4.14–8.8 weeks). The pooled concordance rates between the restaging MRI and the pathological outcomes for ypT stage and ypN stage were 63.9% (54.5%–73.3%, I2 = 96.02%) and 60.9% (42.9%–78.9%, I2 = 98.96%), respectively. The pooled concordance for predicting pathological complete response was 70.4% (53.6%–87.1%, I2 = 98.21%). As for the circumferential resection margin (CRM), the pooled concordance was 78.2.% (71.6%–84.8%, I2 = 83.76%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the concordance rates between restaging MRI and pathological outcomes in rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy are limited. Caregivers should take these results into consideration when making clinical decisions about these patients. More data should be gathered about the predictive value of MRI after total neoadjuvant therapy as well as immunotherapy in rectal cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of colon cancer has changed over the last few decades. We assessed the trends in management and outcomes using the US National Cancer Database (NCDB). A retrospective analysis of all patients with colonic adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2019 was conducted. The cohort was divided into three equal time periods: Period 1 (2005–2009), Period 2 (2010–2014), and Period 3 (2015–2019) to examine treatment and outcomes trends. The primary outcome was 5‐year overall survival (OS). The study included 923,275 patients. A significant increase in patients with stage IV disease was noted in Period 3 compared to Period 1 (47.9% vs. 27.9%, respectively), whereas a reciprocal reduction was seen in patients with locally advanced disease (stage II: 20.8%–12%; stage III: 14.5%–7.7%). Use of immunotherapy significantly increased from 0.3% to 7.6%. Mean 5‐year OS increased (43.6 vs. 42.1 months) despite the increase in metastatic disease and longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (7 vs. 14 days). A reduction in 30‐day readmission (5.1%–4.2%), 30‐ (3.9%–2.8%), and 90‐day mortality (7.1%–5%) was seen. Laparoscopic and robotic surgery increased from 45.8% to 53.1% and 2.9% to 12.7%, respectively. Median postoperative length of hospital stay decreased by 2 days. Rate of positive resection margins (7.2%–6%) and median number of examined lymph nodes (14–16) also improved. Minimally invasive surgery and immunotherapy for colon cancer significantly increased in recent years. Patient outcomes including OS improved over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States. This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors. 133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2–21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001) RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Immunotherapy for the systemic treatment of cancer offers new treatment possibilities for advanced malignancies. Despite promising initial results, evidence on efficacy of immunotherapy for colon cancer is lacking. Thus, we aimed to assess short-term and long-term outcomes of immunotherapy in patients with advanced colon cancer. A US National Cancer Database was searched for patients with stage III-IV colonic adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2019. Propensity score matching was used to classify the cohort into 2 groups: patients who received immunotherapy and controls. Main outcome measures were primary outcome was overall survival (OS). A total of 23,778 patients with stage III-IV colonic adenocarcinoma were treated with immunotherapy during the study period compared to 114,753 controls. Immunotherapy treated patients were younger (median age 61 vs. 67 y; P <0.001), more often male (57.3% vs. 50.7%, P <0.001), had more private insurance (44.1% vs. 33.7%; P <0.001), had more left-sided tumors (49.5% vs. 39.1%; P <0.001) and liver metastasis (80.2% vs. 61.7%; P <0.001) than controls. Immunotherapy patients received more standard chemotherapy (49.8% vs. 41.6%; P <0.001). After propensity-score matching, mean OS was significantly shorter in the immunotherapy group compared with controls (34.7 vs. 36.2 mo; P =0.008). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that immunotherapy was associated with increased risk for mortality (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18; P =0.005). Patients who received immunotherapy had lower 90-day mortality rates compared with controls (2.3% vs. 3.6%; P =0.004), but the groups had equivalent 30-day mortality rates (0.7% vs. 0.8%; P =0.76). Immunotherapy showed no improvement in OS in patients with stage III-IV colon cancer., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to assess concordance between clinical and pathologic assessment of colon cancer., Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with stage I-III colon cancer in the National Cancer Database (2010-2019) was conducted. Concordance between clinical and pathologic assessment of colon cancer was calculated using Kappa coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: A total of 125,473 patients (51.2% female; mean age 68.2 years) were included. There was moderate concordance between clinical and pathologic T stage (Kappa = 0.606, 95%CI: 0.602-0.609) and between clinical and pathologic N stage (Kappa = 0.506, 95%CI: 0.501-0.511). For right-sided colon cancer, there was moderate agreement between clinical and pathologic T stage (Kappa = 0.594, 95%CI: 0.589-0.599) and N stage (Kappa = 0.530, 95%CI: 0.523-0.537). For left-sided colon cancer, there was substantial agreement between clinical and pathologic T stage (Kappa = 0.624, 95%CI: 0.619-0.630) and moderate agreement between N stage (Kappa 0.472, 95%CI: 0.463-0.480). Sensitivity of clinical assessment of T and N stage ranged from 64.3% to 77.2% and 41.6% to 54.5%, respectively. Specificity ranged from 96.7% to 97.7% for T stage and 95.7% to 97.3% for N stage., Conclusions: Clinical assessment of T and N stages of colon cancer had good diagnostic accuracy with moderate concordance with the final pathologic stage. While clinical assessment was highly specific with < 3% of patients being over-staged, it had modest sensitivity, especially for detection of nodal involvement. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment of right and left colon cancers was similar, except for higher sensitivity and accuracy of assessment of nodal involvement in right than left colon cancers., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: We aimed to identify predictors of and heterogeneity in survival among different age groups of patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC)., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used National Cancer Database data from 2004 to 2019. Differences in survival among CRC patients <50 years, subcategorized into age groups (<20, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49 years) were compared for demographic, clinical, and histologic features by univariate and multivariate analyses. Cox hazard regression and Kaplan Meier survival analysis were performed., Results: 134 219 of the 1 240 787 individuals with CRC (10.8%) were <50 years old; 46 639 (34.8%) had rectal and 87 580 (65.3%) had colon cancer. Within the colon cancer cohort, individuals aged between 30 and 39 years had the highest overall survival rate (66.7%) during a median follow-up of 47.6 months (interquartile range IQR 23.1-89.7). The same age group in the rectal cancer cohort had the lowest survival rate (31%) over a median follow-up of 54.5 (IQR 28.24-97.31) months. Leading factors affecting survival included tumor stage (HR 8.23 [4.64-14.6]; p < 0.0001), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.88 [1.70-2.06]; p < 0.0001) and perineural invasion (HR 1.08 [1.02-1.15]; p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Survival trends vary within age groups of patients affected with early onset colon cancer compared to rectal cancer. Tumor stage and unfavorable pathological characteristics are the strongest factors predicting survival., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Colon cancer pathological and clinical staging may be disoncordant. This study assessed patients with colon cancer in whom the nodal status was clinically understaged., Methods: Patients with stage I-III clinical node-negative colon cancer from the National Cancer Database were included. Regression analyses were conducted to elucidate risk factors for clinical nodal understaging and a scoring system was developed to identify high-risk patients., Results: The study included 94,945 patients with 78.4 ​% of patients correctly staged and 21.6 ​% clinically understaged. The predictors of nodal positivity in clinically understaged patients were age <65 (OR 1.43), left-sided tumors (OR 1.41), elevated CEA (OR 2.03), moderately (OR 1.81) or poorly/undifferentiated tumors (OR 3.76), T1 tumors (OR 1.29), signet-ring cell histology (OR 2.26), and microsatellite-stable tumors (OR 1.4)., Conclusion: Patients with colon cancer and the above factors are more likely to have their nodal status clinically understaged. A scoring system has been developed to identify high-risk patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Wexner is a consultant for Baxter, Becton, Dickinson and Co, Glaxo Smith Kline, Intuitive Surgical, Livsmed, Medtronic, OstomyCure, Stryker, Takeda, Virtual Ports, is a member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board of JSR/WCG/ACI (chair), Polypoid (chair), and Boomerang and receives royalties from Intuitive Surgical, Karl Storz Endoscopy America Inc., and Unique Surgical Solutions, LLC., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon tumor types. Lymph node metastases may occur in up to 40%, potentially impacting decision-making. We aimed to assess risk factors for lymph node metastases of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and their association with overall and cancer-specific survival., Methods: This retrospective case-control study involved patients with stage I to III rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection. Data were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2020). Patients with pathologic evidence of lymph node metastases were compared to those without lymph node metastases for baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The main outcomes were lymph node metastases, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival., Results: In total, 580 patients (50.9% male; mean age: 58.9 years) were included. The lymph node metastases rate was 37.1%. Independent predictors of lymph node metastases were Grade 2 neuroendocrine tumors (odds ratio: 8.06; P = .001), neuroendocrine carcinoma (odds ratio: 2.59, P = .006), large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (odds ratio: 4.89; P = .017), T2 tumors (odds ratio: 6.44; P < .001), T3 tumors (odds ratio: 27.5; P < .001), and T4 tumors (odds ratio: 17.3; P < .001). Lymph node metastases were associated with shorter restricted mean overall survival (40.8 vs 52.7 months; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (41.3 vs 54.8 months; P < .001). When adjusted for other confounders, the nodal status of rectal neuroendocrine tumors was not independently associated with overall (hazard ratio = 1.56; P = .165) or cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio = 1.69; P = .158). Significant factors associated with worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival were age, tumor size, neuroendocrine carcinomas, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and the number of positive lymph nodes., Conclusions: Lymph node metastases of rectal neuroendocrine tumors were more likely associated with high-grade, large-sized, and T2 to T4 tumors. The number of involved lymph nodes was an independent predictor of overall and cancer-specific survival. Other independent survival predictors were tumor grade, size, and T stage., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the anal canal, it rarely affects the rectum. The present study aimed to assess the differences in characteristics, treatments, clinical and pathologic outcomes, and survival between anal and rectal squamous cell carcinoma., Methods: The United States National Cancer Databases (2004-2020) of anal canal and rectal cancer were used for this retrospective cohort analysis. Patients with anal or rectal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the analysis. The study's primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and positive resection margins., Results: The present study included 76,830 patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma and 7,908 with rectal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma presented more often with early clinical stage I and stage II disease (50.4% vs 45.9%, P < .001) and less often with stage IV disease (6.5% vs 15.1%, P < .001). Anal squamous cell carcinomas were more often treated with upfront surgery than were rectal squamous cell carcinomas (37.7% vs 19.7%, P < .001), whereas rectal squamous cell carcinomas were more often treated with chemoradiation therapy alone (68.3% vs 59.8%, P < .001). Anal squamous cell carcinomas were treated more often with local excision (33.4% vs 15.8%, P < .001) than rectal squamous cell carcinoma. Anal squamous cell carcinoma was associated with a higher incidence of positive resection margins (41.9% vs 32.8%, P < .001). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were higher after surgery for rectal squamous cell carcinoma than for anal squamous cell carcinoma (1.5% vs 0.4% and 4.1% vs 1.6%, respectively, P < .001). Anal squamous cell carcinoma had longer median overall survival (145.3 vs 90.3 months, P < .001) than rectal squamous cell carcinoma., Conclusion: Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma presented more often with early-stage disease and less often with distant metastasis and were more often treated with upfront surgery, mainly local excision. Anal squamous cell carcinoma was associated with lower 30-day and 90-day mortality and longer overall survival than rectal squamous cell carcinoma., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Unplanned 30-day readmission is common after major surgery, including rectal cancer surgery. The present study aimed to assess the rate and predictors of unplanned 30-day readmission after proctectomy for rectal cancer., Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study using data from the National Cancer Database. Patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer who underwent proctectomy were included, and patients who required readmission within 30 days after discharge were compared to patients who were not readmitted in regard to patient and treatment baseline factors to determine the predictors of 30-day readmission after proctectomy. The main outcome measures were the rate and predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission and the impact of readmission on short-term mortality and overall survival., Results: A total of 55,181 patients (60.9% men) with a mean age of 61.2 years were included. The 30-day readmission rate was 7.07% (95% confidence interval: 6.9-7.3). A Charlson score of 0 (odds ratio: 0.75, P < .001), Medicare insurance (odds ratio: 0.836, P = .04), and private insurance (odds ratio: 0.73, P = .0003) were predictive of a lower likelihood of 30-day readmission, whereas urban living area (odds ratio: 1.18, P = .01), rural living area (odds ratio: 1.65%, P = .0004), neoadjuvant radiation therapy (odds ratio: 1.37, P = .001), pull-through coloanal anastomosis (odds ratio: 1.37, P = .0005), conversion to open surgery (odds ratio: 1.25, P = .001), and hospital stay ≥6 days (odds ratio: 1.02, P < .001) were predictive of a higher likelihood of 30-day readmission. Readmitted patients had a higher rate of 90-day mortality (3.1% vs 2.1%, P < .001) and a lower 5-year overall survival (67.0% vs 72.7%, P < .001) than non-readmitted patients. Using the weighted ORs of the significant predictors of 30-day readmission, a risk score, the Cleveland Clinic Florida REadmission afTer sUrgery for Rectal caNcer in 30 days (RETURN-30) score, was developed., Conclusion: Comorbidities, residence in urban or rural areas, neoadjuvant radiation therapy, pull-through coloanal anastomosis, conversion to open surgery, and extended hospital stay were predictive of a higher risk of 30-day readmission. Patients who were readmitted had a higher rate of 90-day mortality and a lower 5-year overall survival., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)