Search

The article focuses on the labor law jurisprudence of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) after the departure of NLRB Chairwoman Wilma Liebman. Topics include the NLRB's prosecution of unfair business practices, the attacks on the agency by conservative Americans, and the NLRB's decision to prosecute the aerospace company Boeing for anti-union activity.

Objectives: To assess the opinions of individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) and their parents regarding the use of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)., Study Design: A validated questionnaire, including hypothetical clinical scenarios about ERT for MPS, was distributed to members of MPS support groups in the United States and Australia., Results: The questionnaire was completed by 249 MPS support group members. Overall, 92% were in favor of ERT where MPS causes severe physical problems but does not affect intellect, and 69% were in favor of ERT where the physical limitations are mild and intellect is spared. Only 47% were in favor of ERT where severe physical and intellectual problems are well established; however, 77% were in favor of ERT in this situation if treatment begun early prolongs life and improves quality of life., Conclusion: Most respondents were in favor of ERT for MPS, even where it would not alter the intellectual deterioration. The medical community has a responsibility to advocate for their patients in situations where ERT is appropriate and recognize the economic burden and "family function burden" ERT can incur.