Search

The diagnosis of medulloblastoma likely encompasses several distinct entities, with recent evidence for the existence of at least four unique molecular subgroups that exhibit distinct genetic, transcriptional, demographic, and clinical features. Assignment of molecular subgroup through routine profiling of high-quality RNA on expression microarrays is likely impractical in the clinical setting. The planning and execution of medulloblastoma clinical trials that stratify by subgroup, or which are targeted to a specific subgroup requires technologies that can be economically, rapidly, reliably, and reproducibly applied to formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens. In the current study, we have developed an assay that accurately measures the expression level of 22 medulloblastoma subgroup-specific signature genes (CodeSet) using nanoString nCounter Technology. Comparison of the nanoString assay with Affymetrix expression array data on a training series of 101 medulloblastomas of known subgroup demonstrated a high concordance (Pearson correlation r = 0.86). The assay was validated on a second set of 130 non-overlapping medulloblastomas of known subgroup, correctly assigning 98% (127/130) of tumors to the appropriate subgroup. Reproducibility was demonstrated by repeating the assay in three independent laboratories in Canada, the United States, and Switzerland. Finally, the nanoString assay could confidently predict subgroup in 88% of recent FFPE cases, of which 100% had accurate subgroup assignment. We present an assay based on nanoString technology that is capable of rapidly, reliably, and reproducibly assigning clinical FFPE medulloblastoma samples to their molecular subgroup, and which is highly suited for future medulloblastoma clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) is a lethal cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by early-onset synchronous and metachronous multiorgan tumors. We designed a surveillance protocol for early tumor detection in these individuals., Patients and Methods: Data were collected from patients with confirmed CMMRD who were registered in the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium. Tumor spectrum, efficacy of the surveillance protocol, and malignant transformation of low-grade lesions were examined for the entire cohort. Survival outcomes were analyzed for patients followed prospectively from the time of surveillance implementation., Results: A total of 193 malignant tumors in 110 patients were identified. Median age of first cancer diagnosis was 9.2 years (range: 1.7-39.5 years). For patients undergoing surveillance, all GI and other solid tumors, and 75% of brain cancers were detected asymptomatically. By contrast, only 16% of hematologic malignancies were detected asymptomatically ( P < .001). Eighty-nine patients were followed prospectively and used for survival analysis. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 90% (95% CI, 78.6 to 100) and 50% (95% CI, 39.2 to 63.7) when cancer was detected asymptomatically and symptomatically, respectively ( P = .001). Patient outcome measured by adherence to the surveillance protocol revealed 4-year OS of 79% (95% CI, 54.8 to 90.9) for patients undergoing full surveillance, 55% (95% CI, 28.5 to 74.5) for partial surveillance, and 15% (95% CI, 5.2 to 28.8) for those not under surveillance ( P < .0001). Of the 64 low-grade tumors detected, the cumulative likelihood of transformation from low-to high-grade was 81% for GI cancers within 8 years and 100% for gliomas in 6 years., Conclusion: Surveillance and early cancer detection are associated with improved OS for individuals with CMMRD., Competing Interests: Hagit N. BarisConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Igentify LtdSpeakers' Bureau: Sanofi, Takeda, Pfizer Donald BaselHonoraria: BioMarinConsulting or Advisory Role: iQvia Deborah T. BlumenthalConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Novocure, Takeda Miriam BornhorstConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune Sara RhodeHonoraria: Myriad GeneticsSpeakers' Bureau: Myriad GeneticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Myriad Genetics Roula FarahHonoraria: Novo NordiskConsulting or Advisory Role: Novo Nordisk William D. FoulkesResearch Funding: AstraZeneca David GassEmployment: X4 PharmaceuticalsHonoraria: X4 PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Precisionscientia Heather HampelStock and Other Ownership Interests: Genome MedicalConsulting or Advisory Role: InVitae, Genome Medical, Promega, 23andMe Jordan R. HansfordConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Craig HarlosTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GlaxoSmithKline Nobuko HijiyaHonoraria: NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, IncyteResearch Funding: Pfizer Junne KamiharaStock and Other Ownership Interests: PanTher Therapeutics, ROME Therapeutics, TellBioHonoraria: Pfizer, NanoString Technologies, Third Rock Ventures, Foundation MedicineConsulting or Advisory Role: ROME Therapeutics, Third Rock VenturesResearch Funding: PureTech, Ribon Therapeutics, ACD BiotechnePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on drug delivery device licensed to PanTher Therapeutics, Patents on Repeat RNA biomarkers and therapeutics licensed to Rome Therapeutics, Patents on Circulating Tumor Cell Biomarkers Licensed to TellBio Inc Jeffrey KnipsteinEmployment: PRA Health SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Atheneum Alvaro LassalettaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Shire, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Roche, ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Shire, Gilead Sciences Simon C. LingHonoraria: AbbvieResearch Funding: Abbvie, Gilead Sciences Michael P. LinkConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Lilly, Steba Biotech, Mesoblast, GlaxoSmithKline, SyndaxResearch Funding: Seattle Genetics, Janssen Oncology Rebecca Loret de MolaEmployment: Huron Consulting Maura MassiminoConsulting or Advisory Role: Oncoscience, Novartis Gary MasonEmployment: Janssen Research & Development, MerckStock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson, MerckTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen Research & Development Kim E. NicholsStock and Other Ownership Interests: IncyteResearch Funding: Incyte/Novartis, Alpine Immune Sciences Enrico OpocherConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Michael OsbornTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Pfizer Benjamin OshrineHonoraria: Mesoblast Alyssa ReddyConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca Lara ReichmanResearch Funding: Illumina Marc RemkeStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bayer, BB Biotech Ventures, BioNTech AG, InVitae, IDEXX Laboratories Kami Wolfe SchneiderOther Relationship: Journal of Genetic Counseling Duncan StearnsConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/792397 Patrick TombocHonoraria: Unicare Health PlanConsulting or Advisory Role: UniCare Health Plan An Van DammeConsulting or Advisory Role: Octapharm, Pfizer, BayerResearch Funding: Johnson & JohnsonTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Sobi, Shire, Roche Ira WinerResearch Funding: Oncoceutics David S. ZieglerConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Cynthia HawkinsConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: IP for low-grade glioma and sarcoma fusion panels as well as medulloblastoma subgrouping panel David MalkinConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Eric BouffetConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisResearch Funding: Roche, Bristol Myers SquibbNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Recurrent medulloblastoma is a therapeutic challenge because it is almost always fatal. Studies have confirmed that medulloblastoma consists of at least four distinct subgroups. We sought to delineate subgroup-specific differences in medulloblastoma recurrence patterns., Methods: We retrospectively identified a discovery cohort of all recurrent medulloblastomas at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON, Canada) from 1994 to 2012 (cohort 1), and established molecular subgroups using a nanoString-based assay on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues or frozen tissue. The anatomical site of recurrence (local tumour bed or leptomeningeal metastasis), time to recurrence, and survival after recurrence were assessed in a subgroup-specific manner. Two independent, non-overlapping cohorts (cohort 2: samples from patients with recurrent medulloblastomas from 13 centres worldwide, obtained between 1991 and 2012; cohort 3: samples from patients with recurrent medulloblastoma obtained at the NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute [Moscow, Russia] between 1994 and 2011) were analysed to confirm and validate observations. When possible, molecular subgrouping was done on tissue obtained from both the initial surgery and at recurrence., Results: Cohort 1 consisted of 30 patients with recurrent medulloblastomas; nine with local recurrences, and 21 with metastatic recurrences. Cohort 2 consisted of 77 patients and cohort 3 of 96 patients with recurrent medulloblastoma. Subgroup affiliation remained stable at recurrence in all 34 cases with available matched primary and recurrent pairs (five pairs from cohort 1 and 29 pairs from cohort 2 [15 SHH, five group 3, 14 group 4]). This finding was validated in 17 pairs from cohort 3. When analysed in a subgroup-specific manner, local recurrences in cohort 1 were more frequent in SHH tumours (eight of nine [89%]) and metastatic recurrences were more common in group 3 and group 4 tumours (17 of 20 [85%] with one WNT, p=0·0014, local vs metastatic recurrence, SHH vs group 3 vs group 4). The subgroup-specific location of recurrence was confirmed in cohort 2 (p=0·0013 for local vs metastatic recurrence, SHH vs group 3 vs group 4,), and cohort 3 (p<0·0001). Treatment with craniospinal irradiation at diagnosis was not significantly associated with the anatomical pattern of recurrence. Survival after recurrence was significantly longer in patients with group 4 tumours in cohort 1 (p=0·013) than with other subgroups, which was confirmed in cohort 2 (p=0·0075), but not cohort 3 (p=0·70)., Interpretation: Medulloblastoma does not change subgroup at the time of recurrence, reinforcing the stability of the four main medulloblastoma subgroups. Significant differences in the location and timing of recurrence across medulloblastoma subgroups have potential treatment ramifications. Specifically, intensified local (posterior fossa) therapy should be tested in the initial treatment of patients with SHH tumours. Refinement of therapy for patients with group 3 or group 4 tumours should focus on metastases., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

PURPOSE Choroid plexus carcinomas are pediatric tumors with poor survival rates and a strong, but poorly understood, association with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Currently, with lack of biologic predictors, most children are treated with aggressive chemoradiation protocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS We established a multi-institutional tissue and clinical database, which enabled the analysis of specific alterations of the TP53 tumor suppressor and its modifiers in choroid plexus tumors (CPTs). We conducted high-resolution copy-number analysis to correlate these genetic parameters with family history and outcome. Results We studied 64 patients with CPTs. All individuals with germline TP53 mutations fulfilled LFS criteria, whereas all patients not meeting these criteria harbored wild-type TP53 (P < .001). TP53 mutations were found in 50% of choroid plexus carcinomas (CPCs). Additionally, two sequence variants known to confer TP53 dysfunction, TP53 codon72 and MDM2 SNP309, coexisted in the majority of TP53 wild-type CPCs (92%) and not in TP53 mutated CPC (P = .04), which suggests a complementary mechanism of TP53 dysfunction in the absence of a TP53 mutation. High-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis revealed extremely high total structural variation (TSV) in TP53-mutated CPC tumor genomes compared with TP53 wild-type tumors and choroid plexus papillomas (CPPs; P = .006 and .004, respectively). Moreover, high TSV was associated with significant risk of progression (P < .001). Five-year survival rates for patients with TP53-immunopositive and -immunonegative CPCs were 0% and 82 (+/- 9%), respectively (P < .001). Furthermore, 14 of 16 patients with TP53 wild-type CPCs are alive without having received radiation therapy. CONCLUSION Patients with CPC who have low tumor TSV and absence of TP53 dysfunction have a favorable prognosis and can be successfully treated without radiation therapy.