1. Assessment of Ventilation Using Adult and Pediatric Manual Resuscitators in a Simulated Adult Patient.
- Author
-
Justice, Joshua M., Slutsky, Arthur S., Stanford, Nathan, Isennock, Christopher, Siddiqui, Sameer, Zamir, Hamza, Walker III, J. Richard, and Brady, Mark F.
- Subjects
ARTIFICIAL respiration equipment ,RESPIRATORY therapy equipment ,CONTINUING education units ,PULMONARY function tests ,RESPIRATORY therapy ,PROFESSIONAL practice ,HUMAN anatomical models ,DATA analysis ,PULMONARY alveoli ,MULTIPLE regression analysis ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESPIRATORY insufficiency ,RESUSCITATION ,EMERGENCY medicine ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,SIMULATED patients ,MEDICAL masks ,RESPIRATORY measurements ,STATISTICS ,AIRWAY (Anatomy) ,DATA analysis software ,CHILDREN ,ADULTS - Abstract
BACKGROUND: The bag-valve-mask (BVM) or manual resuscitator bag is used as a first-line technique to ventilate patients with respiratory failure. Volume-restricted manual resuscitator bags (eg, pediatric bags) have been suggested to minimize overventilation and associated complications. There are studies that both support and caution against the use of a pediatric resuscitator bag to ventilate an adult patient. In this study, we evaluated the ability of pre-hospital clinicians to adequately ventilate an adult manikin with both an adult- and pediatric-size manual resuscitator bag without the assistance of an advanced airway or airway adjunct device. METHODS: This study was conducted at an international conference in 2022. Conference attendees with pre-hospital health care experience were recruited to ventilate an adult manikin using a BVM for 1 min with both an adult and pediatric resuscitator bag, without the use of adjunct airway devices, while 6 ventilatory variables were collected or calculated: tidal volume (V
T ), breathing frequency, adequate breaths (VT > 150 mL), proportion of adequate breaths, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), and estimated alveolar ventilation (EAV). RESULTS: A total of 208 participants completed the study. Ventilation with the adult-sized BVM delivered an average VT of 290.4 mL compared to 197.1 mL (P < .001) when using the pediatric BVM. PIP with the adult BVM was higher than with the pediatric BVM (10.6 cm H2 O vs 8.6 cm H2 O, P < .001). The median EAV with the adult bag (1,138.1 [interquartile range [IQR] 194.0-2,869.9] mL/min) was markedly greater than with the pediatric BVM (67.7 [IQR 0-467.3] mL/min, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both pediatric- and adult-sized BVM provided lower ventilation volumes than those recommended by professional guidelines for an adult. Ventilation with the pediatric BVM was significantly worse than with the adult bag when ventilating a simulated adult subject. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF