Search

Simple Summary: The manuscript discusses the administration of proton therapy to the first 13 pediatric patients in the prospective SJWT21 clinical trial to assess the efficacy of proton therapy in treating children with stage III-V Wilms' tumor. The group of 13 patients received abdominal irradiation after undergoing a nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. A key aspect of the study highlighted in the manuscript is the rigorous daily monitoring of changes in bowel gas and analyzing how these changes affect the quality of the treatment plan. Additionally, the manuscript investigates the potential inaccuracies in the proton range caused by varying gantry beam angles. It aims to pinpoint the most advantageous gantry angles that would reduce deviations from the intended treatment plan, thereby improving the safety and effectiveness of proton therapy for these young patients. (1) Background: Proton therapy, a precise form of radiation treatment, can be significantly affected by variations in bowel content. The purpose was to identify the most beneficial gantry angles that minimize deviations from the treatment plan quality, thus enhancing the safety and efficacy of proton therapy for Wilms' tumor patients. (2) Methods: Thirteen patients with Wilms' tumor, enrolled in the SJWT21 clinical trial, underwent proton therapy. The variations in bowel gas were systematically monitored using daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging. Air cavities identified in daily CBCT images were analyzed to construct daily verification plans and measure water equivalent path length (WEPL) changes. A worst-case scenario simulation was conducted to identify the safest beam angles. (3) Results: The study revealed a maximum decrease in target dose (ΔD100%) of 8.0%, which corresponded to a WEPL variation (ΔWEPL) of 11.3 mm. The average reduction in target dose, denoted as mean ΔD100%, was found to be 2.8%, with a standard deviation (SD) of 3.2%. The mean ΔWEPL was observed as 3.3 mm, with an SD of 2.7 mm. The worst-case scenario analysis suggested that gantry beam angles oriented toward the patient's right and posterior aspects from 110° to 310° were associated with minimized WEPL discrepancies. (4) Conclusions: This study comprehensively evaluated the influence of bowel gas variability on treatment plan accuracy and proton range uncertainties in pediatric proton therapy for Wilms' tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surveys to assess patient and family experiences of pediatric cancer care have been primarily developed and validated in high-income Western settings with English-speaking participants. However, 90% of children with cancer live in low- and middle-income countries. We sought to develop a survey focused on pediatric cancer communication for use in a low-literacy population in Guatemala, including adaptation of many previously validated items., Methods: A multidisciplinary team developed a quantitative survey on the basis of a theoretical model of important components and influences on pediatric cancer communication. The original survey included established items previously used in high-income settings and novel questions designed for this study. The survey was translated into Spanish and pilot tested with parents of children receiving treatment at Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica in Guatemala City, Guatemala, from April-June 2019. Cognitive interviews were used during pilot testing, and the survey was iteratively revised throughout this process., Results: Early in testing, Guatemalan parents tended to choose answers at the extreme ends of response categories and socially desirable responses. Ultimately, a visual aid was developed to accompany three-item Likert scale response options. This allowed for successful administration of the survey instrument, resulting in moderate variation of response options and similar proportions to those generated when the original five-item responses were used in parent populations from the United States., Conclusion: Appropriately adapted surveys are necessary to understand patient-centered communication among pediatric oncology populations in low- and middle-income countries. Eventual validation of such tools will enable cross-cultural studies and comparative analysis of results.

Background: Provider implicit bias can negatively affect clinician-patient communication. In the current study, the authors measured implicit bias training among pediatric oncology providers and exposure to implicit association tests (IATs). They then assessed associations between IATs for race and socioeconomic status (SES) and recommendations for clinical trial enrollment., Methods: A prospective multisite study was performed to measure implicit bias among oncology providers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and affiliate clinics. An IAT was used to assess bias in the domains of race and SES. Case vignettes were used to determine an association between bias and provider recommendation for trial enrollment. Data were analyzed using Student t tests or Wilcoxon tests for comparisons and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests were used for association., Results: Of the 105 total participants, 95 (90%) had not taken an IAT and 97 (92%) had no prior implicit bias training. A large effect was found for (bias toward) high SES (Cohen d, 1.93) and European American race (Cohen d, 0.96). The majority of participants (90%) had a vignette score of 3 or 4, indicating recommendation for trial enrollment for most or all vignettes. IAT and vignette scores did not significantly differ between providers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital or affiliate clinics. No association was found between IAT and vignette scores for race (P = .58) or SES (P = .82)., Conclusions: The authors noted a paucity of prior exposure to implicit bias self-assessments and training. Although these providers demonstrated preferences for high SES and European American race, this did not appear to affect recommendations for clinical trial enrollment as assessed by vignettes., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)