1. The impact of Canadian-produced research on the global orthopedic literature: a bibliometric analysis.
- Author
-
Dartus J, Devos P, Matache BA, Bédard L, Pelet S, and Belzile EL
- Subjects
- Humans, United States, Canada, Bibliometrics, Japan, Orthopedics, Orthopedic Procedures
- Abstract
Background: Little is known about the quality and impact of Canadian-produced research relative to that of other developed nations. The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of Canadian authors to the orthopedic literature globally and nationally as well as Canada's research productivity in orthopedics. We hypothesized that Canada ranks among the most impactful countries in terms of orthopedic research productivity., Methods: We performed a bibliometric analysis to identify articles published between 2001 and 2020 in the category of orthopedics. We identified Canada's global rank in terms of overall productivity and assessed the contributions of individual Canadian authors. We also examined the quality of publications as determined by category normalized citation impact (CNCI) and publication in the top quartile of journals (%Q1) in terms of impact factor. In addition, we calculated the percentage of Canadian publications that were in orthopedics., Results: We identified 10 821 orthopedic publications from 2001 to 2020. Canada placed sixth globally in terms of productivity in orthopedic research. The annual productivity of Canadian orthopedic researchers increased over the study period by a factor of 3.2. In terms of research quality, with a %Q1 of 36.5% and a CNCI of 1.22, Canada outperformed Asian countries and the United States; the latter country had a %Q1 of 35.3% and a CNCI of 1.14 over the study period., Conclusion: The body of Canadian orthopedic literature has grown consistently over the past 20 years. Despite the overall leadership of the United States and other developed nations such as China and Japan, Canada ranks among the most influential countries in terms of the quality and quantity of orthopedic research., Competing Interests: Competing interests: B. Matache has received consulting fees from Arthrex and honoraria from Pendopharm. E. Belzile has received royalties from Bodycad, consulting fees from Pendopharm and Victhom and honoraria from Stryker, CONMED, Johnson & Johnson and Pendopharm., (© 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF