Search

Background: Although apixaban and rivaroxaban are commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD), there is limited evidence comparing the 2 drugs in these patients.Objective: To emulate a target trial of effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with AF and VHD.Design: New-user, active comparator, cohort study design.Setting: Commercial health insurance database from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020.Patients: New users of apixaban or rivaroxaban who had a diagnosis of AF and VHD before initiation of anticoagulant therapy.Measurements: The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Cox proportional hazards regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.Results: When compared with rivaroxaban in a propensity score-matched cohort of 19 894 patients (9947 receiving each drug), apixaban was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.80]) and bleeding (HR, 0.51 [CI, 0.41 to 0.62]). The absolute reduction in the probability of stroke or systemic embolism with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban was 0.0026 within 6 months and 0.011 within 1 year of treatment initiation. The absolute reduction in the probability of bleeding events with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban was 0.012 within 6 months and 0.019 within 1 year of treatment initiation.Limitation: Short follow-up time and inability to ascertain some types of VHD.Conclusion: In this study of patients with AF and VHD, patients receiving apixaban had a lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and for bleeding when compared with those receiving rivaroxaban.Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Apixaban and rivaroxaban are replacing vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults; however, head-to-head comparisons remain limited.Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban in patients with VTE.Design: Retrospective new-user cohort study.Setting: U.S.-based commercial health care insurance database from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2020.Participants: Adults with VTE who were newly prescribed apixaban or rivaroxaban.Measurements: The primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE, a composite of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding.Results: Of 49 900 eligible patients with VTE, 18 618 were new users of apixaban and 18 618 were new users of rivaroxaban. Median follow-up was 102 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 30, 128 days) among apixaban and 105 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 30, 140 days) among rivaroxaban users. After propensity score matching, apixaban (vs. rivaroxaban) was associated with a lower rate for recurrent VTE (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.87]) and bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.60 [CI, 0.53 to 0.69]). The absolute reduction in the probability of recurrent VTE with apixaban versus rivaroxaban was 0.006 (CI, 0.005 to 0.011) within 2 months and 0.011 (CI, 0.011 to 0.013) within 6 months of initiation. The absolute reduction in the probability of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding with apixaban versus rivaroxaban was 0.011 (CI, 0.010 to 0.011) within 2 months and 0.015 (CI, 0.013 to 0.015) within 6 months of initiation.Limitation: Short follow-up.Conclusion: In this population-based cohort study, patients with VTE who were new users of apixaban had lower rates for recurrent VTE and bleeding than new users of rivaroxaban.Primary Funding Source: None. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a rare bleeding disorder with markedly decreased or absent von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, accompanied by a parallel decrease in VWF function and factor VIII (FVIII) activity. The goal of this study was to describe the population of patients enrolled in the USA Centers for Disease Control Universal Data Collection (UDC) study with type 3 VWD, defined as a VWF:Ag of <10%, and to correlate bleeding symptoms with VWF and FVIII levels. Data on 150 patients were analysed. Almost all patients experienced bleeding episodes (98%) and required blood and/or factor product treatment (92%). While oral mucosal bleeding (the site of first bleed in 54%) was most common, subsequent muscle and joint bleeds were also seen (28%, 45%, respectively), and intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 8% of individuals. Mean age of first bleed was lower in those with either a FVIII ≤5% or a VWF:Ag <1%. Univariate marginal model analysis showed lower levels of FVIII and VWF:Ag both predicted a higher risk of joint bleeding. Longitudinal multivariate analysis found a lower FVIII level ( P = 0.03), increasing age ( P < 0.0001), history of joint bleeding ( P = 0.001), higher body mass index (BMI) ( P < 0.0001), and use of home infusion ( P = 0.02) were all negatively associated with joint mobility. Low levels of VWF:Ag ( P = 0.003) and male sex ( P = 0.007) were also negatively associated with joint function. This study documents the strong bleeding phenotype in severe VWD and provides data to help target therapy, including prophylaxis, for patients most at risk of bleeding complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines how suspended clays alter the trophic interactions that govern composition and density of the zooplankton community in a small eutrophic lake in North Carolina. Use of enclosure in a complete, triplicated, cross-classified design; Release of crustacean zooplankton from visual planktivores due to turbidity; Predation as the main governing factor.

Enclosures in a small piedmont reservoir in the south-eastern United States were used to determine the effects of loading by phosphate and two clay sediments on periphyton community structure and production during the summer growing season. The experimental design included replicated controls and the following treatment added at 2- to 3-day intervals: phosphate (PHOS), kaolinite (KAOL), montmorillonite (MONT), kaolinite with phosphate (K + P), and montmorillonite with phosphate (M + P). Periphyton were sampled from polyethylene strips of the same material as the enclosure walls, suspended at depths of 0.5 m and 2.0 m to assess treatment effects on shallow (epilimnetic) vs. deep (hypolimnetic) communities. Colonization after 40 days was sparse, dominated in biovolume by blue-green algae in all but the epilimnion of controls, in which small gelatinous green algae and chrysophyte flagellates were abundant. The biovolume of shallow periphyton after 79 days was lowest in KAOL and MONT, intermediate in controls and PHOS, and greatest in clay + P. Hence, P enrichment alleviated the deleterious effects of clay on periphyton production, and clay + P appeared to act synergistically in stimulating benthic algal growth. Periphyton biovolume was comparable among shallow and deep controls, PHOS, and treatments with the rapidly settling kaolinite. Lowest biovolume occurred at depth in treatments with montmorillonite under extreme light attenuation imposed by the suspended, finely particulate clay. The relative contribution of blue-green algae to total periphyton production was highest in clay + P treatments and lowest in controls. Heterotrophic dinoflagellates increased in the shallow periphyton under clay loading, and in the deep communities under PHOS and M + P. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article has been temporarily removed as it was inadvertently posted ahead of an agreed-upon embargo. The article will be reinstated upon embargo expiry. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The American Society of Hematology (ASH) develops a variety of resources that provide guidance to clinicians on the diagnosis and management of blood diseases. These resources include clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and other forms of clinical advice. Although both ASH CPGs and other forms of clinical advice provide recommendations, they differ with respect to the methods underpinning their development, the principal type of recommendations they offer, their transparency and concordance with published evidence, and the time and resources required for their development. It is crucial that end users be aware of the differences between CPGs and other forms of clinical advice and that producers and publishers of these resources use clear and unambiguous terminology to facilitate their distinction. The objective of this article is to highlight the similarities and differences between ASH CPGs and other forms of ASH clinical advice and discuss the implications of these differences for end users., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Abstract: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) vs with plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (pdVWF) for patients with severe Von Willebrand disease. We found that rVWF is a cost-saving factor replacement compared with pdVWF across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) conducted extensive, inclusive community consultations to guide prioritization of research in coming decades in alignment with its mission to find cures and address and prevent complications enabling people and families with blood disorders to thrive., Research Design and Methods: With the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network, NHF recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill the community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk. WG6 was charged with identifying the infrastructure, workforce development, and funding and resources to facilitate the prioritized research. Community input on conclusions was gathered at the NHF State of the Science Research Summit., Results: WG6 detailed a minimal research capacity infrastructure threshold, and opportunities to enable its attainment, for bleeding disorders centers to participate in prospective, multicenter national registries. They identified challenges and opportunities to recruit, retain, and train the diverse multidisciplinary care and research workforce required into the future. Innovative collaborative approaches to trial design, resource networking, and funding to surmount obstacles facing research in rare disorders were elucidated., Conclusions: The innovations in infrastructure, workforce development, and resources and funding proposed herein may contribute to facilitating a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders.

Background: Stroke is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although the risk of VTE persists after hospital discharge, information on the utilization of anticoagulants among stroke patients after discharge remains limited., Objective: To evaluate changes in post-discharge thromboprophylaxis among stroke patients between 2006 and 2019., Methods: We conducted a retrospective repeated cross-sectional analysis using a commercial healthcare insurance database in the United States. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with incident stroke diagnosis and assessed prophylactic use of anticoagulants in the 30 days following hospital discharge including low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin ≤40 mg/day, dalteparin ≤5000 IU/day), unfractionated heparin ≤5000 IU/ twice daily or 3 times a day, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, and rivaroxaban 10 mg/day. Patients with atrial fibrillation, VTE, mechanical heart valves, cancer, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and users of therapeutic doses of anticoagulants were excluded. We used the Cochrane-Armitage test to assess changes in the use of anticoagulants across the study period., Results: There was a small increase in the overall use of post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulants among stroke patients between 2006 and 2019 from 0.5% to 1.9%. The use of heparin decreased from 0.5% in 2006 to 0.3% in 2019 (P-value for trend = 0.001). In contrast, the use of apixaban or rivaroxaban increased from 0.1% in 2013 to 1.6% in 2019 (P-value for trend < 0.001). Apixaban was more commonly used than rivaroxaban., Conclusions: In this population-based study of stroke patients, we found that post-discharge anticoagulant use remains low through 2019. Prophylactic use of heparin or rivaroxaban was relatively low but the use of apixaban increased over the study period. Further research is needed to determine if these agents are safe and effective for VTE prevention in stroke patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest GKD receives funding from the American Society of Hematology and National Institutes of Health. AC has served as a consultant for Synergy and his institution has received research support on his behalf from Alexion, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Spark. AR declares no conflicts of interest. SH has consulted for the Medullary Thyroid Cancer Consortium (Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and GlaxoSmithKline), Novo Nordisk, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Biogen MA, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Provention Bio, Inc on matters unrelated to the topic of this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19-related acute illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)., Objective: These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in making decisions about the use of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19., Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included patient representatives and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process and performed systematic evidence reviews (through November 2021). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update to guidelines published in February 2021 as part of the living phase of these guidelines., Results: The panel made one additional recommendation. The panel issued a conditional recommendation in favor of therapeutic-intensity over prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related acute illness who do not have suspected or confirmed VTE. The panel emphasized the need for an individualized assessment of risk of thrombosis and bleeding. The panel also noted that heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight) may be preferred because of a preponderance of evidence with this class of anticoagulants., Conclusion: This conditional recommendation was based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for additional, high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related acute illness., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19-related critical illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)., Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in decisions about the use of anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19., Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel, including 3 patient representatives, and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (up to January 2022). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update to guidelines published in February 2021 and May 2021 as part of the living phase of these guidelines., Results: The panel made 1 additional recommendation: a conditional recommendation for the use of prophylactic-intensity over therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have suspected or confirmed VTE. The panel emphasized the need for an individualized assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk., Conclusions: This conditional recommendation was based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for additional, high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related critical illness., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Administrative claims provide a rich data source for retrospective studies of real-world clinical practice, yet some important data may be inconsistent or unavailable. This study explored factors influencing discontinuation of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) among patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), by adding medical chart abstraction for additional details. Adult (≥ 18 years) patients with continuous commercial or Medicare Advantage with Part D health insurance coverage were included. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 1 claim for eltrombopag or romiplostim and ≥ 2 diagnoses of ITP between December 31, 2017, and January 1, 2020. Providers were asked to provide access to medical charts for abstraction. The analyses included only patients who discontinued TPO-RA and described patient characteristics, treatment patterns, platelet values, and reasons for discontinuation. Among 207 ITP patients treated with a TPO-RA, 137 (66%) discontinued treatment during the observation period. The mean TPO-RA treatment duration was 185 days. Mean platelet count at the time of discontinuation was 197 × 10 9 /L. The most common reason for discontinuation was improvement of the patient's condition (42%). Other reasons included worsening of ITP/lack of response (12%), adverse events (12%), and cost-related or social reasons (23%). No reason was reported for 10%. Notably 26% of patients who discontinued remained off all ITP therapy for the remainder of the study, with a mean treatment-free period of 262 days. These results emphasize that some patients with ITP are able to discontinue TPO-RA therapy and achieve durable treatment-free periods., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Severe adverse events (AEs) after COVID-19 vaccination are not well studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) due to rarity and short follow-up. To monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines ("Pfizer" vaccine dose 1 and 2, "Moderna" vaccine dose 1 and 2, and "Janssen" vaccine single dose) in the U.S., especially regarding severe AEs, we compare the relative rankings of these vaccines using both RCT and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data. The risks of local and systemic AEs were assessed from the three pivotal COVID-19 vaccine trials and also calculated in the VAERS cohort consisting of 559,717 reports between December 14, 2020 and September 17, 2021. AE rankings of the five vaccine groups calculated separately by RCT and VAERS were consistent, especially for systemic AEs. For severe AEs reported in VAERS, the reported risks of thrombosis and GBS after Janssen vaccine were highest. The reported risk of shingles after the first dose of Moderna vaccine was highest, followed by the second dose of the Moderna vaccine. The reported risk of myocarditis was higher after the second dose of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. The reported risk of anaphylaxis was higher after the first dose of Pfizer vaccine. Limitations of this study are the inherent biases of the spontaneous reporting system data, and only including three pivotal RCTs and no comparison with other active vaccine safety surveillance systems., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: COVID-19-related acute illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)., Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in decisions about the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE., Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel, including 3 patient representatives, and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (up to March 2021). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment., Results: The panel agreed on 1 additional recommendation. The panel issued a conditional recommendation against the use of outpatient anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 who are discharged from the hospital and who do not have suspected or confirmed VTE or another indication for anticoagulation., Conclusions: This recommendation was based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials assessing the role of postdischarge thromboprophylaxis. Other key research priorities include better evidence on assessing risk of thrombosis and bleeding outcomes in patients with COVID-19 after hospital discharge., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are replacing warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of concomitant treatment with antiplatelet-DOAC compared to antiplatelet-warfarin in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and AF., Design: Retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study using United States-based commercial healthcare database from January 2016 to June 2019., Participants: New-users of antiplatelet-DOAC and antiplatelet-warfarin who initiated the combined therapy within 30 days following incident ACS diagnosis., Measurements: Primary study outcomes were recurrent cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (ie, a composite of stroke and myocardial infarction) and major bleeding events identified via discharge diagnoses. We controlled for potential confounders via propensity score matching (PSM). We generated marginal hazard ratios (HRs) via Cox proportional hazards regression using a robust variance estimator while adjusting for calendar time., Results: After PSM, a total of 2,472 persons were included (1,236 users of antiplatelet-DOAC and 1,236 users of antiplatelet-warfarin). The use of antiplatelet-DOAC (vs. antiplatelet-warfarin) was associated with a reduced rate of recurrent CVD (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.92) and major bleeding events (adjusted HR, 0.49, 95% CI 0.33-0.72)., Limitations: Residual confounding., Conclusions: In real-world data of AF patients with concurrent ACS, the use of antiplatelet-DOAC following ACS diagnosis was associated with a lower rate of recurrent CVD and major bleeding events compared with antiplatelet-warfarin. These findings highlight a potential promising role for DOACs in patients with ACS and AF requiring combined antiplatelet therapy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19-related critical illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)., Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in making decisions about the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE., Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 3 patient representatives and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline development process by performing systematic evidence reviews (up to 5 March 2021). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update on guidelines published in February 2021., Results: The panel agreed on 1 additional recommendation. The panel issued a conditional recommendation in favor of prophylactic-intensity over intermediate-intensity anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE., Conclusions: This recommendation was based on low certainty in the evidence, which underscores the need for additional high-quality, randomized, controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation in critically ill patients. Other key research priorities include better evidence regarding predictors of thrombosis and bleeding risk in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and the impact of nonanticoagulant therapies (eg, antiviral agents, corticosteroids) on thrombotic risk., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs in ∼1 to 2 individuals per 1000 each year, corresponding to ∼300 000 to 600 000 events in the United States annually., Objective: These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about treatment of VTE., Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and adult patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment., Results: The panel agreed on 28 recommendations for the initial management of VTE, primary treatment, secondary prevention, and treatment of recurrent VTE events., Conclusions: Strong recommendations include the use of thrombolytic therapy for patients with PE and hemodynamic compromise, use of an international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0 over a lower INR range for patients with VTE who use a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for secondary prevention, and use of indefinite anticoagulation for patients with recurrent unprovoked VTE. Conditional recommendations include the preference for home treatment over hospital-based treatment for uncomplicated DVT and PE at low risk for complications and a preference for direct oral anticoagulants over VKA for primary treatment of VTE.

Background: Methods for the development of clinical guidelines have advanced dramatically over the past 2 decades to strive for trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) have followed these advances, together with application of methodological innovations., Objective: In this article, we describe methods and methodological innovations as a model to inform future guideline enterprises by ASH and others to achieve guideline standards. Methodological innovations introduced in the development of the guidelines aim to address current challenges in guideline development., Methods: We followed ASH policy for guideline development, which is based on the Guideline International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and current best practices. Central coordination, specialist working groups, and expert panels were established for the development of 10 VTE guidelines. Methodological guidance resources were developed to guide the process across guidelines panels. A methods advisory group guided the development and implementation of methodological innovations to address emerging challenges and needs., Results: The complete set of VTE guidelines will include >250 recommendations. Methodological innovations include the use of health-outcome descriptors, online voting with guideline development software, modeling of pathways for diagnostic questions, application of expert evidence, and a template manuscript for publication of ASH guidelines. These methods advance guideline development standards and have already informed other ASH guideline projects., Conclusions: The development of the ASH VTE guidelines followed rigorous methods and introduced methodological innovations during guideline development, striving for the highest possible level of trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor.

Since November 2018, Blood Advances has published American Society of Hematology (ASH) clinical practice guidelines on venous thromboembolism, immune thrombocytopenia, and sickle cell disease. More ASH guidelines on these and other topics are forthcoming. These guidelines have been developed using consistent processes, methods, terminology, and presentation formats. In this article, we describe how patients, clinicians, policymakers, researchers, and others may use ASH guidelines and the many related derivates by describing how to interpret information and how to apply it to clinical decision-making. Also, by exploring how these documents are developed, we aim to clarify their limitations and possible inappropriate usage., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Despite an increase in the number of therapies available to treat patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), there are minimal data from randomized trials to assist physicians with the management of patients., Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the management of ITP., Methods: In 2015, ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 8 adult clinical experts, 5 pediatric clinical experts, 2 methodologists with expertise in ITP, and 2 patient representatives. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel reviewed the ASH 2011 guideline recommendations and prioritized questions. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence (up to May 2017) and formulate recommendations., Results: The panel agreed on 21 recommendations covering management of ITP in adults and children with newly diagnosed, persistent, and chronic disease refractory to first-line therapy who have non-life-threatening bleeding. Management approaches included: observation, corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, splenectomy, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists., Conclusions: There was a lack of evidence to support strong recommendations for various management approaches. In general, strategies that avoided medication side effects were favored. A large focus was placed on shared decision-making, especially with regard to second-line therapy. Future research should apply standard corticosteroid-dosing regimens, report patient-reported outcomes, and include cost-analysis evaluations., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

The Sentinel Distributed Database (SDD) is a database of patient administrative healthcare records, derived from insurance claims and electronic health records, sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration for evaluation of medical product outcomes. There is limited information on the validity of diagnosis codes for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the SDD and administrative healthcare data more generally.In this chart validation study, we report on the positive predictive value (PPV) of inpatient administrative diagnosis codes for acute VTE-pulmonary embolism (PE) or lower-extremity or site-unspecified deep vein thrombosis (DVT)-within the SDD. As part of an assessment of thromboembolic adverse event risk following treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IGIV), charts were obtained for 75 potential VTE cases, abstracted, and physician-adjudicated.VTE status was determined for 62 potential cases. PPVs for lower-extremity DVT and/or PE were 90% (95% CI: 73-98%) for principal-position diagnoses, 80% (95% CI: 28-99%) for secondary diagnoses, and 26% (95% CI: 11-46%) for position-unspecified diagnoses (originating from physician claims associated with an inpatient stay). Average symptom onset was 1.5 days prior to hospital admission (range: 19 days prior to 4 days after admission).PPVs for principal and secondary VTE discharge diagnoses were similar to prior study estimates. Position-unspecified diagnoses were less likely to represent true acute VTE cases.