Search

Objective: Transgender people are less likely to have health insurance, which has been associated with reduced utilization of health care. In the current study, the authors sought to assess the role of health insurance in mental health care utilization among transgender individuals., Methods: A total of 4,334 adults who self-identified as transgender or gender diverse (neither male nor female) participated in the 2017 Trans Lifeline Mental Health Survey, which included self-report measures of current insurance type and lifetime history of having seen a therapist or psychiatric provider. Logistic regression analyses assessed the association of insurance status with lifetime utilization of a mental health therapist or psychiatric provider., Results: Although only 8% of the sample were uninsured, these individuals were significantly less likely to have seen a therapist or psychiatric provider in their lifetime compared with those with health insurance, even after the analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic factors. Conversely, those with insurance through the military or the Veterans Health Administration were more than twice as likely as those with employer-provided insurance to have seen a therapist or psychiatric provider. There were no significant differences in mental health care utilization between those with employer-provided insurance versus public or privately purchased insurance., Conclusions: Rates of being uninsured were lower than in earlier assessments of transgender adults and adults who identify as gender diverse. However, type of health insurance also appeared to be a notable structural factor contributing to disparities in mental health care utilization among transgender individuals.

Medicaid managed care is now an important factor in the financing of rural health care delivery. The participation of rural family physicians in Medicaid managed care is vital for the rural poor to access health services. This study examined 855 family physicians practicing in nonmetropolitan counties across the United States to determine their readiness to participate in Medicaid managed care. Physicians were asked about their experience with prepaid programs and the factors that would influence their participation in such a program. A shortage of health care providers and low reimbursement rates were most frequently cited as barriers to successful implementation. Physicians who had participated in prepaid programs in the past but were no longer participating had the most negative opinions about the potential for Medicaid managed care programs to enhance care for the poor in their communities. Overall, physicians reported potential for the program to improve access and quality of care, but they also expressed reservations about the financial and administrative effects on their practices. These results reveal that negative attitudes were associated with prepaid programs that failed to meet expectations, but physicians also expressed an optimism about the potential to serve the poor within a managed care model.

Background: This study was undertaken to assess the impact of traditionally unmeasured patient-centered factors on primary care physicians' decisions to adhere to an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for heart failure., Methods: Experimental and control scenarios were developed to test three patient-centered factors hypothesized to influence physician nonadherence to a heart failure guideline: patient concerns about finances, quality of life, and location of care. Each factor represented an implicit patient goal potentially in conflict with a goal of the guideline recommendations. A control scenario for one factor and an experimental scenario for a second were placed within a cross-sectional survey and questionnaires were mailed by random assignment to 978 Upstate New York family physicians. Experimental and control responses were compared by chi square., Results: The response rate was 47% (n = 456). Each hypothetical patient-centered factor resulted in significant reductions in physicians' predicted adherence. Reductions in reported pharmaceutical usage and testing of left ventricular (LV) function were associated with patient financial difficulties (P < .01). The poor quality-of-life scenario was associated with reduced testing for LV function but increased discussion of advance directives (P < .01). The clinical scenario limiting access to services for a rural patient was associated with decreases in physician choice of LV function tests and cardiology referrals (P < .05)., Conclusions: Patient-specific factors are associated with physician decisions to comply with guideline recommendations. These findings suggest that performance profiles measuring physician adherence to guidelines should be interpreted with caution, and that current case-mix methodologies may not adequately control for patient-centered factors that may influence health care quality.

Background: The use of clinical guidelines is one strategy intended to improve health care quality, rein in costs, and standardize medical practice. Clinical guideline development has been prodigious, while less effort has been expended on the guidelines' dissemination and implementation. This study examines family physician attitudes toward and perceived uses of clinical guidelines in practice., Methods: A survey questionnaire was sent to 978 family physicians in Upstate New York to assess their confidence in clinical guidelines developed or endorsed by organizations and the perceived usefulness of such guidelines in practice. Descriptive analyses, chi-square tests, and comparison of means (one-way ANOVA) were conducted., Results: After two mailings, the response rate was 43%. Most respondents perceived clinical guidelines as effective educational tools that should improve the quality of patient care, but were concerned about their potential regulatory intrusion into practice. Solo practitioners expressed more negative attitudes regarding clinical guidelines than physicians in non-solo practices. Respondents had greater confidence in clinical guidelines developed or endorsed by their professional society, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, and the National Institutes of Health, but less in those by insurance companies or state health departments. The reported adoption rate of clinical guidelines was low. The most preferred methods for adoption were continuing medical education and practice interventions., Conclusions: Family physicians found clinical guidelines to be valuable educational tools but were divided on their potential regulatory role. If clinical guidelines are to improve quality in practice, they must be more effectively disseminated and implemented. To broaden physicians' adoption of clinical guidelines, further research into dissemination and implementation methods is warranted, along with wider endorsement of guidelines by those whom family physicians trust.

Background: Effective clinical practice guidelines should improve clinical outcomes, and measures of physician use of clinical practice guidelines should correlate with improved outcomes. This study translates a clinical practice guideline on heart failure into review criteria to measure physician performance and the effectiveness of the clinical practice guideline., Methods: A panel of 11 family physicians and 1 cardiologist systematically reviewed the clinical practice guideline for its clinical importance, educational relevance, and evaluative appropriateness. Then a subset of 4 family physicians rigorously applied each recommendation to established criteria for measurability and developed an evaluation tool useful in medical record review., Results: The heart failure clinical practice guideline was found to be an excellent educational tool. Using it to measure physician performance, however, was limited to diagnostic tests and drug prescribing. Of 45 recommendations, 5 fulfilled criteria for measurability; 1 recommendation had A-level evidence, whereas 2 recommendations had B-level and 2 had C-level evidence., Conclusion: This study illustrates the logistic issues and challenges in developing a measure of physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Medical record review is inadequate to measure many recommendations. Physicians use of this clinical practice guideline must be evaluated as an intermediate step to measuring the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines based on patient outcomes.

Objectives: To compare the demographic characteristics of patients who miss appointments with those who do not and to identify subgroups who would benefit from specific interventions for improving attendance., Design: Retrospective cohort study of an 18-month period., Setting: An urban primary care practice., Patients: A random sample (N = 477) of patients who were seen at least twice during the study period., Main Outcome Measures: Number of missed visits and kept visits, insurer, age, sex, race, ZIP code, and diagnoses., Results: Of the established patients, 48% missed 1 or more visits. Patients in managed care programs, private and Medicaid, were likely to have missed more visits during the study period than those not in managed care programs (P < .001). Medicaid managed care patients had also scheduled more visits. Significantly higher rates of missed appointments were found in patients aged 19 to 35 years (P = .02), blacks (P < .001), patients in Medicaid managed care programs (P < .001), and patients who scheduled more visits (P < .001). After adjusting for age, race, and sex, Medicaid managed care insurance remained a significant (P < .01) predictor of rate of missed appointments., Conclusions: Patients in managed care programs missed more appointments. Patients in Medicaid managed care programs scheduled more appointments and had higher rates of missed appointments than their counterparts in other insurance groups.