Search

The blood proteome, consisting of thousands of proteins engaged in various biological processes, acts as a valuable source of potential biomarkers for various medical applications. PROphet is a plasma proteomics-based test that serves as a decision-support tool for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, combining proteomic profiling using SomaScan technology and subsequent computational algorithm. PROphet was implemented as a laboratory developed test (LDT). Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and Commission on Office Laboratory Accreditation (COLA) regulations, prior to releasing patient test results, a clinical laboratory located in the United States employing an LDT must examine its performance characteristics with regard to analytical validity. This study describes the experimental and computational analytical validity of the PROphet test, as required by CLIA/COLA regulations. Experimental precision analysis displayed a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 3.9 % and 4.7 % for intra-plate and inter-plate examination, respectively, and the median accuracy rate between sites was 88 %. Computational precision exhibited a high accuracy rate, with 93 % of samples displaying complete concordance in results. A cross-platform comparison between SomaScan and other proteomics platforms yielded a median Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.51, affirming the consistency and reliability of the SomaScan platform as used under the PROphet test. Our study presents a robust framework for evaluating the analytical validity of a platform that combines an experimental assay with subsequent computational algorithms. When applied to the PROphet test, strong analytical performance of the test was demonstrated., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ben Yellin, Coren Lahav, Itamar Sela, Galit Yahalom, Shani Raveh Shoval, Yehonatan Elon, Michal Harel reports financial support, article publishing charges, equipment, drugs, or supplies, and writing assistance were provided by OncoHost Ltd. Jim Fuller reports a relationship with OncoHost Ltd that includes: consulting or advisory. Coren Lahav, Itamar Sela, Yehonatan Elon, Michal Harel has patent #WO 2023/017525 A1 pending to OncoHost Ltd., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Biomarker testing in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer provides essential information that can be used to select the most appropriate therapy. The regular updates of guideline recommendations reflect the growing number of biomarkers that must be assessed, and as such signal the shift from single-gene assays to more comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing modalities. Cytology and small biopsy specimens have proven to be more than adequate substrates for these types of ancillary molecular testing; however, other alternative testing substrates are beginning to emerge. These include so-called liquid biopsies as well the supernatant fluid from cytology specimens, both of which have demonstrated promise for use in the clinical realm. This review will briefly cover the current state of non-small cell lung cancer biomarker testing in the United States, with a focus on these novel nonconventional substrates that are increasingly being incorporated into testing paradigms., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Aim: To determine real-world outcomes with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor expression ≥50%. Methods: This retrospective study included adults with ECOG 0-1 initiating first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy on/after 24 October 2016 (EHR cohort) or from 1 December 2016 through 30 November 2017 (spotlight cohort) with ≥6-month follow-up. We estimated Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS, both cohorts), and, for spotlight, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) by Kaplan-Meier and real-world tumor response (rwTR). Results: For 423 patients in the EHR cohort and 188 in spotlight, median OS was 18.9 months (95% CI: 14.9-25.5) and 19.1 months (12.6-not reached), respectively. For spotlight, median rwPFS was 6.8 months (5.3-8.1); rwTR of complete/partial response was 48% (41-56%). Conclusion: Observed OS, rwPFS and rwTR were consistent with clinical trial findings.

Time-varying clearance (CL) has been recently recognized in U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug labels for oncology monoclonal antibodies. Pembrolizumab population CL at steady state decreased about 20% from the first dose, and individual CL changes varied from 75% decrease to 25% increase, which were correlating with disease conditions. From mechanism of action perspective, this research explored the longitudinal covariate effect on pembrolizumab CL based on data from a phase II/III clinical trial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Time courses of sum of the longest tumor dimensions, lymphocyte count, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase were first characterized separately, and the post hoc parameters of each individual patient were fixed in the subsequent semimechanistically based modeling analysis. Pembrolizumab time-varying CL was assumed to be associated with the patient's sum of the longest tumor dimensions, lymphocyte count, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase, and tumor-related pembrolizumab CL was assumed to be a fraction of total pembrolizumab CL in the semimechanistically based modeling., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway plays an important role in the innate immune responses and antigen-specific acquired immunity. Aberrant activation of the TLR pathway has a significant impact on carcinogenesis or tumor progression. Therefore, we hypothesize that genetic variants in the TLR signaling pathway genes are associated with overall survival (OS) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To test this hypothesis, we first performed Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to evaluate associations between genetic variants of 165 TLR signaling pathway genes and NSCLC OS using the genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). The results were further validated by the Harvard Lung Cancer Susceptibility GWAS dataset. Specifically, we identified IRAK2 rs779901 C > T as a predictor of NSCLC OS, with a variant-allele (T) attributed hazards ratio (HR) of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67-0.91, P = 0.001] in the PLCO dataset, 0.84 (0.72-0.98, 0.031) in the Harvard dataset, and 0.81 (0.73-0.90, 1.08x10 -4 ) in the meta-analysis of these two GWAS datasets. In addition, the T allele was significantly associated with an increased mRNA expression level of IRAK2. Our findings suggest that IRAK2 rs779901 C > T may be a promising prognostic biomarker for NSCLC OS., (© 2018 UICC.)

Background: To what extent steroid hormones contribute to lung cancer in male and female never smokers and smokers is unclear. We examined expression of hormone receptors in lung tumors by sex and smoking., Methods: Patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer were recruited into an Intergroup study in the United States and Canada, led by SWOG (S0424). Tumors from 813 cases (450 women and 363 men) were assayed using immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER)-α, ER-β, progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Linear regression was used to examine differences in expression by sex and smoking status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival associated with the receptors. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: In ever smokers, postmenopause and oral contraceptive use were associated with lower nuclear ER-β (P = .02) and total (nuclear + cytoplasmic) PR expression (P = .02), respectively. Women had lower cytoplasmic ER-α (regression coefficient [β], or differences in H-scores = -15.8, P = .003) and nuclear ER-β (β = -12.8, P = .04) expression than men, adjusting for age, race, and smoking. Ever smokers had both higher cytoplasmic ER-α (β = 45.0, P < .001) and ER-β (β = 25.9, P < .001) but lower total PR (β = -42.1, P < .001) than never smokers. Higher cytoplasmic ER-α and ER-β were associated with worse survival (hazard ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 2.58, and HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.33, respectively; quartiles 4 vs 1)., Conclusions: Lower expression of nuclear ER-β in women supports the estrogen hypothesis in lung cancer etiology. Increasing cytoplasmic ER-α and ER-β and decreasing PR protein expression may be mechanisms whereby smoking disrupts hormone pathways.

Introduction: On 12 December 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ramucirumab for use in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Areas covered: This review discusses the best treatment strategy for ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor for patients with advanced NSCLC. Expert opinion: The addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy confers a 1.4-month improvement in overall survival, with an acceptable toxicity profile. The potential impact of the approval of the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody nivolumab or pembrolizumab on the use of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC patient population is uncertain in clinical practice. In order to improve overall outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC, both ramucirumab plus docetaxel and the PD-1-blocking antibody should be used in any treatment line.

Over the last 2 years, our therapeutic armamentarium against genomically defined subgroups of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has extended to patients with acquired resistance to front-line targeted therapy. Alectinib (Alecensa; Roche/Genentech), a second-generation, orally active, potent, and highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), is indicated for patients with metastatic, ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC whose disease has worsened after treatment with crizotinib or who became intolerant to the drug. Alectinib received orphan drug designation, breakthrough therapy designation, priority review status, and accelerated approval by the FDA. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5177-82. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

On December 11, 2015, the FDA granted accelerated approval to alectinib (Alecensa; Genentech) for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK)-positive, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. This approval was based on two single-arm trials including 225 patients treated with alectinib 600 mg orally twice daily. The objective response rates (ORR) by an independent review committee in these studies were 38% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28-49] and 44% (95% CI, 36-53); the median durations of response (DOR) were 7.5 months and 11.2 months. In a pooled analysis of 51 patients with measurable disease in the central nervous system (CNS) at baseline, the CNS ORR was 61% (95% CI, 46-74); the CNS DOR was 9.1 months. The primary safety analysis population included 253 patients. The most common adverse reactions were fatigue (41%), constipation (34%), edema (30%), and myalgia (29%). The most common laboratory abnormalities were anemia (56%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (51%), increased alkaline phosphatase (47%), increased creatine phosphokinase (43%), hyperbilirubinemia (39%), hyperglycemia (36%), increased alanine aminotransferase (34%), and hypocalcemia (32%). Dose reductions due to adverse reactions occurred in 12% of patients, whereas 27% of patients had alectinib dosing interrupted for adverse reactions. Permanent discontinuation of alectinib due to adverse reactions occurred in only 6% of patients. With the clinically meaningful ORR and DOR as well as the safety profile observed in these trials, alectinib was determined to have a favorable benefit-risk profile for the treatment of the indicated population. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5171-6. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The binding of programmed death ligand-1 and ligand-2 (PD-L1 and PD-L2) to PD-1 blocks T-cell-mediated immune response to tumor. Antibodies that target programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) will block the ligand-receptor interface, thereby allowing T cells to attack the tumor and increase antitumor immune response. In clinical trials, PD-1 inhibitors have been associated with an approximately 20% overall response rate in unselected patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with sustained tumor response in a subset of patients treated by these immune checkpoint inhibitors. Facing a proliferation of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry clones, staining platforms, and scoring criteria, the pathologist must decide on the feasibility of introducing a newly approved companion diagnostic assay that may require purchase not only of a specific antibody kit but of a particular staining platform. Given the likely reality that clinical practice may, in the near future, demand access to 4 different PD-L1 antibodies coupled with different immunohistochemistry platforms, laboratories will be challenged with deciding among this variety of testing methods, each with its own potential benefits. Another immediate challenge to PD-L1 testing in lung cancer patients is that of access to adequate tumor tissue, given that non-small cell lung cancer samples are often extremely limited in size. With PD-L1 testing it has become clear that the historically used US regulatory approach of one assay-one drug will not be sustainable. One evolving concept is that of complementary diagnostics, a novel regulatory pathway initiated by the US Food and Drug Administration, which is distinct from companion diagnostics in that it may present additional flexibility. Although pathologists need to face the practical reality that oncologists will be asking regularly for the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry status of their patients' tumors, we should also keep in mind that there may be room for improvement of biomarkers for immunotherapy response. The field is rich with opportunities for investigation into biomarkers of immunotherapy response, particularly in the form of collaborative, multidisciplinary studies that incorporate oncologists, pathologists, and basic scientists. Pathologists must take the lead in the rational incorporation of these biomarkers into clinical practice.

Introduction: This study analyzed the risk of clinical trial failure during non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) drug development between 1998 and January 2012. We also looked for factors that impacted clinical trial risk in NSCLC., Methods: NSCLC drug development was investigated using trial disclosures from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and other publically available resources. Compounds were excluded from the analysis if they had begun phase I clinical testing before 1998, did not use treatment-relevant endpoints, or if they did not have a completed phase I trial in NSCLC. Analysis was conducted in regard to treatment indication, compound classification, and mechanism of action., Results: Six hundred seventy-six clinical trials that included 199 unique compounds met our inclusion criteria. The likelihood, or cumulative clinical trial success rate, that a new drug would pass all phases of clinical testing and be approved was found to be 11%, which is less than industry aggregate rates. Over half of the biomarkers used in NSCLC have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in any indication. Biomarker targeted therapies (62%) and receptor targeted therapies (31%) were found to have the highest success rates. The risk-adjusted cost for NSCLC clinical drug development was calculated to be U.S. $1.89 billion., Conclusion: Biomarker use alone in this indication resulted in a sixfold increase in clinical trial success whereas receptor targeted therapies did so by almost threefold. Physicians who enroll patients in NSCLC trials should prioritize their participation in clinical trial programs that use biomarkers and receptor targeted therapies.

A major promise of genomic research is information that can transform health care and public health through earlier diagnosis, more effective prevention and treatment of disease, and avoidance of drug side effects. Although there is interest in the early adoption of emerging genomic applications in cancer prevention and treatment, there are substantial evidence gaps that are further compounded by the difficulties of designing adequately powered studies to generate this evidence, thus limiting the uptake of these tools into clinical practice. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is intended to generate evidence on the "real-world" effectiveness compared with existing standards of care so informed decisions can be made to improve health care. Capitalizing on funding opportunities from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the National Cancer Institute funded seven research teams to conduct CER in genomic and precision medicine and sponsored a workshop on CER on May 30, 2012, in Bethesda, Maryland. This report highlights research findings from those research teams, challenges to conducting CER, the barriers to implementation in clinical practice, and research priorities and opportunities in CER in genomic and precision medicine. Workshop participants strongly emphasized the need for conducting CER for promising molecularly targeted therapies, developing and supporting an integrated clinical network for open-access resources, supporting bioinformatics and computer science research, providing training and education programs in CER, and conducting research in economic and decision modeling.

Objective: To determine the incidence of Wnt pathway activation in patients with stage I NSCLC and its influence on lung cancer recurrence., Background: Despite resection, the 5-year recurrence with localized stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is 18.4%-24%. Aberrant Wnt signaling activation plays an important role in a wide variety of tumor types. However, there is not much known about the role the Wnt pathway plays in patients with stage I lung cancer., Methods: Tumor and normal lung tissues from 55 patients following resection for stage I NSCLC were subjected to glutathione S-transferase (GST) E-cadherin pulldown and immunoblot analysis to assess levels of uncomplexed β-catenin, a reliable measure of Wnt signaling activation. The β-catenin gene was also screened for oncogenic mutations in tumors with activated Wnt signaling. Cancer recurrence rates were correlated in a blinded manner in patients with Wnt pathway-positive and -negative tumors., Results: Tumors in 20 patients (36.4%) scored as Wnt positive, with only 1 exhibiting a β-catenin oncogenic mutation. Patients with Wnt-positive tumors experienced a significantly higher rate of overall cancer recurrence than those with Wnt-negative tumors (30.0% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.02), with 25.0% exhibiting distal tumor recurrence compared with 2.9% in the Wnt-negative group (P = 0.02)., Conclusions: Wnt pathway activation occurred in a substantial fraction of Stage I NSCLCs, which was rarely due to mutations. Moreover, Wnt pathway activation was associated with a significantly higher rate of tumor recurrence. These findings suggest that Wnt pathway activation reflects a more aggressive tumor phenotype and identifies patients who may benefit from more aggressive therapy in addition to resection.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with large variation of the incidence and mortality across regions. Although the mortality of lung cancer has been decreasing, or steady in the US, it has been increasing in Asia for the past two decades. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, and other risk factors such as indoor coal burning, cooking fumes, and infections may play important roles in the development of lung cancer among Asian never smoking women. The median age of diagnosis in Asian patients with lung cancer is generally younger than Caucasian patients, particularly among never-smokers. Asians and Caucasians may have different genetic susceptibilities to lung cancer, as evidenced from candidate polymorphisms and genome-wide association studies. Recent epidemiologic studies and clinical trials have shown consistently that Asian ethnicity is a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), independent of smoking status. Compared with Caucasian patients with NSCLC, East Asian patients have a much higher prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (approximately 30% vs. 7%, predominantly among patients with adenocarcinoma and never-smokers), a lower prevalence of K-Ras mutation (less than 10% vs. 18%, predominantly among patients with adenocarcinoma and smokers), and higher proportion of patients who are responsive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The ethnic differences in epidemiology and clinical behaviors should be taken into account when conducting global clinical trials that include different ethnic populations.

Dysregulated signal transduction of growth factor receptors contributes to the process of malignant transformation by promoting cell proliferation, motility, and invasion through extracellular matrix as well as angiogenesis. Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), and to a lesser extent HER2/neu, is overexpressed in the majority of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with normal tissue, making them ideal targets for the development of novel therapeutics for this disease. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that antireceptor strategies employing antagonistic monoclonal antibodies or low molecular weight tyrosine kinase inhibitors against EGFR are well tolerated and occasionally result in objective clinical responses in patients with advanced NSCLC. This report provides an overview of the molecular basis and the preclinical evidence supporting clinical development of anti-EGFR therapy as well as results of phase I-III clinical trials of these compounds in treating patients with solid tumors including NSCLC.