Search

This study focuses on the contraceptive experiences of abortion-fund applicants to draw attention to various elements that restrict the realization of reproductive justice in the Rocky Mountain Region of the United States. This study uses qualitative data from 830 applications to an abortion fund submitted between 2013 and 2022. Our findings highlight a range of experiences, from contraceptive failure and side effects, to diminished access and reproductive coercion. Abortion-fund applicants described individual, interpersonal, and structural factors that shaped their access to contraception. This study calls for various interventions, including implementing comprehensive sex education, to ensure reproductive justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and the deadliest of all skin cancers. Even with recent advancements in treatment, there is still a 13% two-year recurrence rate, with approximately 30% of recurrences being distant metastases. Identifying patients at high risk for recurrence or advanced disease is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Currently, there is substantial variability in the selection of screening tests and imaging, with most modalities characterized by relatively low accuracy. In the current study, we built upon a preliminary examination of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in the melanoma setting to examine its utility for diagnostic and prognostic assessment. Using regression analysis, we found that selected DSC profile (thermogram) parameters were useful for differentiation between melanoma patients and healthy controls, with more complex models distinguishing melanoma patients with no evidence of disease from patients with active disease. Thermogram features contributing to the third principal component (PC3) were useful for differentiation between controls and melanoma patients, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that PC3 was useful for predicting the overall survival of active melanoma patients. With the further development and optimization of the classification method, DSC could complement current diagnostic strategies to improve screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of melanoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Publications are an important component of academic careers. Aims: We investigated the financial costs to authors for submitting and publishing manuscripts in gastroenterology (GI) journals in the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), and elsewhere. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out from 11/1/2020 to 12/31/2020. We used the SCImago Journal and Country Rankings site to compile a list of gastroenterology and hepatology journals to analyze. We gathered information on the journals' Hirsch indices (h indices), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), Impact Factor (IF), and base countries as of 2019, processing and publication fees, open access fees, time to first decision, and time from acceptance to publication. We used t-testing and linear regression modeling to evaluate the effect of geography and journal quality metrics on processing fees and times. Results: We analyzed 97 GI journals, of which 51/97 (52.6%) were based in the US/UK while the other 46/97 (47.4%) were based elsewhere. The mean IF (5.67 vs 3.53, p = 0.08), h index (90.5 vs 41.8, p < 0.001), and SJR (1.82 vs 0.83, p < 0.001) for the US/UK journals were higher than those for non-US/UK journals. We also found that 11/51 (21.6%) of US/UK journals and 15/46 (32.6%) of non-US/UK journals had mandatory processing and publication fees. These tended to be significantly larger in the US/UK group than in the non-US/UK group (USD 2380 vs USD 1470, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Publication-related fees may preclude authors from smaller or socioeconomically disadvantaged institutions and countries from publishing and disseminating their work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic therapy is considered first line for management of benign biliary strictures (BBSs). Placement of plastic stents has been effective but limited by their short-term patency and need for repeated procedures. Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) offer longer-lasting biliary drainage without the need for frequent exchanges.Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of FCSEMS in patients with BBS.Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent ERCP and FCSEMS placement at five tertiary referral US hospitals was performed. Stricture resolution and adverse events related to ERCP and/or stenting were recorded.Results: A total of 123 patients underwent FCSEMS placement for BBS and 112 underwent a subsequent follow-up ERCP. The mean age was 62 years (±15.6), and 57% were males. Stricture resolution occurred in 81% of patients after a mean of 1.2 stenting procedures (mean stent dwell time 24.4 ± 2.3 weeks), with a mean follow-up of 18.5 months. Stricture recurrence occurred in 5 patients, and 3 patients required surgery for treatment of refractory strictures. Stent migration (9.7%) was the most common complication, followed by stent occlusion (4.9%), cholangitis (4.1%), and pancreatitis (3.3%). There was one case of stent fracture during removal, and one stent could not be removed. There was one death due to cholangitis.Conclusions: Majority of BBS can be successfully managed with 1-2 consecutive FCSEMS with stent dwell time of 6 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Preliminary studies performed outside of the United States demonstrated that spiral enteroscopy is safe and effective when performed in young, healthy patients. However, spiral enteroscopy has not been evaluated in a US population of patients with numerous comorbidities. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of spiral enteroscopy in a US population of older patients with multiple comorbidities and a high prevalence of pathologic findings. Methods: We performed a prospective case series of 61 patients with clinical indications for deep enteroscopy conducted at 2 US academic tertiary referral centers. Patients underwent deep enteroscopy with the spiral Endo-Ease Discovery SB overtube. Insertion depth, procedure time, diagnostic findings, therapeutic maneuvers, sedation type, and complications were recorded. Results: Spiral enteroscopy was attempted in 61 patients (mean age, 65.4 ± 12.4 years); 52% were rated by American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines as class 3 (n = 30) or 4 (n = 2). The procedure was successfully completed in 56 of 61 patients (92%). Average insertion depth was 217.4 ± 79 cm beyond the ligament of Treitz. The total mean procedure time was 41 ± 15 minutes (diagnostic time, 36 ± 12 minutes; therapy time, 5 ± 9 minutes). Positive findings were noted in 36 cases (59%), with therapeutic maneuvers performed in 30 cases (49%). A total of 41 cases (67%) were performed under conscious sedation; fluoroscopy was not used in any case. Four mild complications occurred, and there were no perforations. Conclusions: Spiral enteroscopy is technically feasible and safe in an elderly US population of patients with numerous comorbidities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]