Search

Background: Regionalization of emergency general surgery (EGS) has primarily focused on expediting care of high acuity patients through interfacility transfers. In contrast, triaging low-risk patients to a nondesignated trauma facility has not been evaluated. This study evaluates a 16-month experience of a five-surgeon team triaging EGS patients at a tertiary care, Level I trauma center (TC) to an affiliated community hospital 1.3 miles away., Methods: All EGS patients who presented to the Level I TC emergency department from January 2020 to April 2021 were analyzed. Patients were screened by EGS surgeons covering both facilities for transfer appropriateness including hemodynamics, resource need, and comorbidities. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for disposition, diagnosis, comorbidities, length of stay, surgical intervention, and 30-day mortality and readmission., Results: Of 987 patients reviewed, 31.5% were transferred to the affiliated community hospital, 16.1% were discharged home from the emergency department, and 52.4% were admitted to the Level I TC. Common diagnoses were biliary disease (16.8%), bowel obstruction (15.7%), and appendicitis (14.3%). Compared with Level I TC admissions, Charlson Comorbidity Index was lower (1.89 vs. 4.45, p < 0.001) and length of stay was shorter (2.23 days vs. 5.49 days, p < 0.001) for transfers. Transfers had a higher rate of surgery (67.5% vs. 50.1%, p < 0.001) and lower readmission and mortality (8.4% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.004; 0.6% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Reasons not to transfer were emergency evaluation, comorbidity burden, operating room availability, and established care. No transfers required transfer back to higher care (under-triage). Bed days saved at the Level I TC were 693 (591 inpatients). Total operating room minutes saved were 24,008 (16,919, between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm)., Conclusion: Transfer of appropriate patients maintains high quality care and outcomes, while improving operating room and bed capacity and resource utilization at a tertiary care, Level I TC. Emergency general surgery regionalization should consider triage of both high-risk and low-risk patients., Level of Evidence: Prospective comparative cohort study, Level II., (Copyright © 2021 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Background: The obesity rate for the Hispanic population is significantly higher than that of white, non-Hispanic people in the United States, yet Hispanic people undergo disproportionately fewer metabolic and bariatric surgery procedures. This study used the Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry to examine potential differences in preoperative co-morbidities and postoperative outcomes in Hispanic adults undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures in the United States., Objectives: To study the presence of the Hispanic paradox in metabolic and bariatric surgery utilizing the MBSAQIP registry., Setting: Academic Teaching Institution., Methods: Participant User Files from the Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program were reviewed for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (2015-2017). Patients were grouped by race (Hispanic versus all other races) and primary procedure performed. Variables for major and minor postoperative complications were combined. A univariate analysis was performed on unmatched and propensity-matched cohorts., Results: After applying exclusions, 53,353 (13.7%) Hispanic patients and 335,299 non-Hispanic patients remained. A univariate analysis demonstrated Hispanic patients had the lowest preoperative co-morbidity profile compared with all other races and decreased rates of major and minor postoperative complications. Using matched-cohort data, when complications were assessed and grouped as major/minor complications, rates of major and minor complications in Hispanic patients were lower in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group, despite Hispanic patients having higher leak rates. Similarly, there were no differences between Hispanic/non-Hispanic sleeve gastrectomy patients in overall major/minor complication rates despite Hispanic patients exhibiting higher venous thromboembolism and lower bleeding compared with non-Hispanic patients., Conclusion: Hispanic patients undergo disproportionately low rates of metabolic and bariatric surgery procedures and present with lower incidence of preoperative co-morbidities. Additionally, Hispanic patients have the same or decreased incidence of postoperative complications compared with non-Hispanic patients, thereby corroborating the Hispanic paradox., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)