Search

Zika virus is a mosquito-transmitted flavivirus and was first linked to congenital microcephaly caused by a large outbreak in northeastern Brazil. Although the Zika virus epidemic is now in decline, pregnancies in large parts of the Americas remain at risk because of ongoing transmission and the potential for new outbreaks. This review presents why Zika virus is still a complex and worrisome public health problem with an expanding spectrum of birth defects and how Zika virus and related viruses evade the immune response to injure the fetus. Recent reports indicate that the spectrum of fetal brain and other anomalies associated with Zika virus exposure is broader and more complex than microcephaly alone and includes subtle fetal brain and ocular injuries; thus, the ability to prenatally diagnose fetal injury associated with Zika virus infection remains limited. New studies indicate that Zika virus imparts disproportionate effects on fetal growth with an unusual femur-sparing profile, potentially providing a new approach to identify viral injury to the fetus. Studies to determine the limitations of prenatal and postnatal testing for detection of Zika virus-associated birth defects and long-term neurocognitive deficits are needed to better guide women with a possible infectious exposure. It is also imperative that we investigate why the Zika virus is so adept at infecting the placenta and the fetal brain to better predict other viruses with similar capabilities that may give rise to new epidemics. The efficiency with which the Zika virus evades the early immune response to enable infection of the mother, placenta, and fetus is likely critical for understanding why the infection may either be fulminant or limited. Furthermore, studies suggest that several emerging and related viruses may also cause birth defects, including West Nile virus, which is endemic in many parts of the United States. With mosquito-borne diseases increasing worldwide, there remains an urgent need to better understand the pathogenesis of the Zika virus and related viruses to protect pregnancies and child health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study sought to examine the functional health literacy in a sample of geriatric patients diagnosed with movement disorders. The hypothesis was that the study group would demonstrate marginal levels of health literacy scores on a standardized health literacy instrument. Design/Setting: The study used a prospective analysis of patients referred to an outpatient movement disorders clinic in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Patients: Fifty-four men with a movement disorder volunteered for the study, with data analysis conducted on 44 of these patients. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Results: Members of the current sample demonstrated adequate health literacy and scored significantly higher on the TOFHLA relative to the measure''s normative sample. Younger age, more education, and higher Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores were predictive of health literacy. Conclusions: The extant literature strongly suggests that limited health literacy is a frequent problem across the United States and represents a considerable obstacle to the effective delivery of health care. In a group of movement disorder subjects with a Folstein MMSE of at least 24, health literacy was generally well preserved. Years with movement disorder and severity of disorder did not impact health literacy. Thus, practitioners should not be prejudiced in a belief that individuals with movement disorders cannot manage their medications. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The optimal timing of vaccination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines after cellular therapy is incompletely understood. The objectives of this study are to determine whether humoral and cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ if initiated <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study at 30 cancer centers in the United States. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was administered as part of routine care. We obtained blood prior to and after vaccinations at up to 5 time points and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike (anti-S) IgG in all participants and neutralizing antibodies for Wuhan D614G, Delta B.1.617.2, and Omicron B.1.1.529 strains, as well as SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell receptors, in a subgroup., Results: We enrolled 466 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (n = 231), autologous HCT (n = 170), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy (n = 65) recipients between April 2021 and June 2022. Humoral and cellular responses did not significantly differ among participants initiating vaccinations <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy. Anti-S IgG ≥2500 U/mL was correlated with high neutralizing antibody titers and attained by the last time point in 70%, 69%, and 34% of allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T-cell recipients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were attained in 57%, 83%, and 58%, respectively. Pre-cellular therapy SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and baseline B-cell count were key predictors of post-cellular therapy immunity., Conclusions: These data support mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination prior to, and reinitiation 3 to 4 months after, cellular therapies with allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T-cell therapy., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . J. A. H—research funding: AlloVir, Geovax, Merck; consulting: Pfizer, Gilead, Moderna, Geovax, AlloVir. J. H. Y.—research funding: AlloVir, Ansun, Cidara, F2G, GSK, NobelPharma, Pulmocide, Scynexis, Shire/Takeda. L. W. L.—employment and equity holder in Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation. M. V. D.—research funding: Janssen, Roche/Genentech. R. N.—consulting: Ono Pharmaceutical, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bluebird Bio, Omeros Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Pfizer. J. M.—consulting: Evision, Kite, Allovir, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, CRISPR, Nektar, Caribiou Bio, Sana Technologies, Legend Biotech. S. D.—research funding: MSK Leukemia SPORE Career Enhancement Program and MSK Gerstner Physician Scholar program. J. J. A.—employment: National Marrow Donor Program; Advisory Board: AscellaHealth, Takeda. M. H.—research support/funding: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, ADC Therapeutics, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma; consultancy: Incyte Corporation, MorphoSys, SeaGen, Gamida Cell, Novartis, Legend Biotech, Kadmon, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, AbbVie, Caribou, CRISPR, Genmab, Kite; Speaker’s Bureau: Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, ADC Therapeutics, Kite; Data Monitoring Committee: Myeloid Therapeutics, Inc. M. L. R.—research funding from Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Atara Bio-Pharma; employment by IQVIA Biotech and Kura Oncology; stock in Kura Oncology. M. M. H.—research funding from Astellas Pharma, CSL Behring, Incyte, Sanofi; consultancy: Sobi, Inc. M.-A. P.—honoraria from Adicet, Allogene, Allovir, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Equilium, Exevir, ImmPACT Bio, Incyte, Karyopharm, Kite/Gilead, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Omeros, OrcaBio, Sanofi, Syncopation, VectivBio AG, and Vor Biopharma; he serves on Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for Cidara Therapeutics and Sellas Life Sciences, and the scientific advisory board of NexImmune; he has ownership interests in NexImmune, Omeros, and OrcaBio; he has received institutional research support for clinical trials from Allogene, Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Nektar Therapeutics, and Novartis. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)