Search

Background: The number of diabetes patients is steadily increasing worldwide. Consequently, the social burden of diabetes is huge, requiring urgent countermeasures. We performed an intensive survey of antidiabetic drugs approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union., Methods: Information about approved antidiabetic drugs was obtained by searching databases of regulatory authorities in the 3 regions. Other relevant information was also obtained from publicly available literature and documents., Results: No difference in the total number and types of approved drugs among the 3 regions was found ( P = .173 by log-rank test). However, the numbers of approved dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in Japan were almost double of those in the other regions. The average sample size in clinical trials used for antidiabetic drug approval in Japan (1134 patients) was much smaller than that in the other regions ( P < .001 by analysis of variance repeated measures test adjusted by the Holm method). Currently, 6 drugs with known modes of action are being developed for type 1 diabetes in Japan, whereas at the end of 2016, nearly 7-fold more products with novel modes of action were in clinical development in the United States., Conclusion: Antidiabetic drug development in Japan costs less than that in the other regions, although novel development is less active because of regulatory differences. To achieve better pharmacotherapy for diabetes, the regulatory framework requires careful consideration.

International collaboration is important in healthcare quality evaluation; however, few international comparisons of general surgery outcomes have been accomplished. Furthermore, predictive model application for risk stratification has not been internationally evaluated. The National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan was developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), with a goal of creating a standardized surgery database for quality improvement. The study aimed to compare the consistency and impact of risk factors of 3 major gastroenterological surgical procedures in Japan and the United States (US) using web-based prospective data entry systems: right hemicolectomy (RH), low anterior resection (LAR), and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).Data from NCD and ACS-NSQIP, collected over 2 years, were examined. Logistic regression models were used for predicting 30-day mortality for both countries. Models were exchanged and evaluated to determine whether the models built for one population were accurate for the other population.We obtained data for 113,980 patients; 50,501 (Japan: 34,638; US: 15,863), 42,770 (Japan: 35,445; US: 7325), and 20,709 (Japan: 15,527; US: 5182) underwent RH, LAR, and, PD, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rates for RH were 0.76% (Japan) and 1.88% (US); rates for LAR were 0.43% versus 1.08%; and rates for PD were 1.35% versus 2.57%. Patient background, comorbidities, and practice style were different between Japan and the US. In the models, the odds ratio for each variable was similar between NCD and ACS-NSQIP. Local risk models could predict mortality using local data, but could not accurately predict mortality using data from other countries.We demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of the international collaborative research between Japan and the US, but found that local risk models remain essential for quality improvement., Competing Interests: disclosures: The authors report no conflicting financial interests.