1. Sex differences in clinical profile, management, and outcomes of patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation in the United States.
- Author
-
Noubiap JJ, Thomas G, Agbaedeng TA, Fitzgerald JL, Gallagher C, Middeldorp ME, and Sanders P
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, United States epidemiology, Male, Aged, Sex Characteristics, Treatment Outcome, Hospitalization, Atrial Fibrillation therapy, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Catheter Ablation methods
- Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the impact of sex on the clinical profile, utilization of rhythm control therapies, cost of hospitalization, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the United States., Methods and Results: We used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the year 2018. Regression analysis was performed to investigate differences between men and women. A P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. We included 82592 patients with a primary diagnosis of of AF 50.8% women. Women were significantly older (mean age 74 vs. 67 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (median 4 vs. 2, P < 0.001) than men. Women had relatively higher in-hospital mortality (0.9% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.070); however, after adjustment for known risk factors female sex was no longer a predictor of mortality (P = 0.199). In sex-specific regression analyses, increased age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous stroke, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease were risk factors for in-hospital mortality in both sexes, vascular disease only in women, and race and alcohol abuse only in men. After adjusting for potential confounders, female sex was associated with lower likelihood of receiving catheter ablation [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.74] and electrical cardioversion (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.72), and with longer hospitalization (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.37), whereas sex had no influence on hospitalization costs (P = 0.339)., Conclusion: There were differences in the risk profile, management, and outcomes between men and women hospitalized for AF. Further studies are needed to explore why women are treated differently regarding rhythm control procedures., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF