Search

Cardiac embolism plays a very significant role in acute ischemic strokes (AIS), constituting approximately one-third of cases. The origin of these emboli often stems from intracardiac thrombi in the left atrium or left ventricle. Utilizing the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2019, we investigate the prevalence of cardiac thrombi in AIS patients and explore their potential correlation with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) utilization, and mortality rates. Among 1,272,456 AIS patients, 0.6% had concurrent cardiac thrombus, with an increasing trend observed over the study period (P value < 0.001). The cardiac thrombus cohort showed a higher prevalence of comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. After propensity-score matching, groups were well-balanced in terms of baseline characteristics. Patients within the cardiac thrombus cohort experienced a longer hospital stay (median 5 days vs. 3 days), but no significant difference in mortality was noted. Importantly, the cardiac thrombus cohort demonstrated a higher frequency of EVT utilization, suggesting a link to larger vessel occlusions. Despite matching based on atrial fibrillation, the EVT utilization in the cardiac thrombus cohort remained high, highlighting a significant association. While 30-day readmission rates were comparable, cardiac thrombus patients faced a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke, likely attributed to anticoagulation use. Limitations include potential miscoding in the administrative database and a lack of detailed imaging findings. In conclusion, this study highlights the increased likelihood of EVT in AIS patients with cardiac thrombus, possibly indicative of larger vessel occlusion associated with cardiac thrombus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Prospective sequential analyses after a new drug approval allow proactive surveillance of new drugs. In the current study, we demonstrate feasibility of frailty-specific sequential analyses for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin. Methods: We partitioned Medicare data from 2011 to 2020 into datasets based on calendar year following the date of drug approval. Each calendar year of data was added sequentially for analysis. We used a new-user, active comparative design by comparing the initiators of dabigatran versus warfarin, rivaroxaban versus warfarin, and apixaban versus warfarin. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with atrial fibrillation without contraindication to the anticoagulants were included. Claims-based frailty index ≥ 0.25 was used to define frailty. The initiators of each direct oral anticoagulant were propensity-score matched to the initiators of warfarin within each frailty status. The effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding. For each calendar year, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards models using all data available up to that year. Results: As an example of the results, in the 2020 dataset, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism (frail: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85; non-frail: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59–0.72) and major bleeding (frail: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57–0.69; non-frail: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.56–0.63) in both frail and non-frail patients. We found evidence for apixaban's effectiveness and safety within 1–2 years after the drug approval in frail older patients. Conclusion: Our frailty-specific sequential analyses can be applied to future near-real-time monitoring of newly approved drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a 2024 study on the attitudes of patients 65 years and older on the use of routine clinical data in making treatment decisions. Results show participants' interest in such data and in how drugs work for them, and their concerns on confounders like populations' similarity of conditions with them, and on common minor side effects. Also noted are participants' common view that their physicians determine the evidence's applicability to them, and recommend a medication.

Purpose To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2024 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. Methods Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2024 were reviewed—including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, endocrine drugs, generics, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2024 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. Results In 2023, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 13.6% compared to 2022, for a total of $722.5 billion. Utilization (a 6.5% increase), new drugs (a 4.2% increase) and price (a 2.9% increase) drove this increase. Semaglutide was the top drug in 2023, followed by adalimumab and apixaban. Drug expenditures were $37.1 billion (a 1.1% decrease) and $135.7 billion (a 15.0% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, increased utilization drove growth, with a small impact from price and new products. In nonfederal hospitals, a drop in utilization led the decrease in expenditures, with price and new drugs modestly contributing to growth in spending. Several new drugs that will influence spending are expected to be approved in 2024. Specialty, endocrine, and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures. Conclusion For 2024, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 10.0% to 12.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate an 11.0% to 13.0% increase and a 0% to 2.0% increase, respectively, compared to 2023. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and amyloidosis increase stroke risk. We evaluated the best anticoagulation strategy in AF patients with coexistent amyloidosis. Methods: Consecutive AF patients with concomitant amyloidosis were divided into two groups based on the postablation stroke‐prophylaxis approach; group 1: left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in eligible patients and group 2: oral anticoagulation (OAC). Group 1 patients were further divided into Gr. 1A: LAAO + half‐does NOAC (HD‐NOAC) for 6 months followed by aspirin 81 mg/day and Gr. 1B: LAAO + HD‐NOAC. In group 1 patients, with complete occlusion at the 45‐day transesophageal echocardiogram, patients were switched to aspirin, 81 mg/day at 6 months. In case of leak, or dense "smoke" in the left atrium (LA) or enlarged LA, they were placed on long‐term half‐dose (HD) NOAC. Group 2 patients remained on full‐dose NOAC during the whole study period. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in the analysis; group 1: 56 and group 2: 36. After the 45‐day TEE, 31 patients from group 1 remained on baby‐aspirin and 25 on HD NOAC. At 1‐year follow‐up, four stroke, one TIA and six device‐thrombus were reported in group 1A, compared to none in patients in group 1B (5/31 vs. 0/25, p =.03). No bleeding events were reported in group 1, whereas group 2 had five bleeding events (one subdural hematoma, one retinal hemorrhage, and four GI bleedings). Additionally, one stroke was reported in group 2 that happened during brief discontinuation of OAC. Conclusion: In patients with coexistent AF and amyloidosis, half‐dose NOAC following LAAO was observed to be the safest stroke‐prophylaxis strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Off-label dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is both common and associated with adverse patient outcomes. Evidence describing best practices to support optimal direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing is limited. Objective: To describe the impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on DOAC prescribing. Methods: This retrospective study was a descriptive analysis conducted within an integrated healthcare system with a centralized, pharmacist-led Anticoagulation Management Service (AMS). Patients prescribed a DOAC between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were included. Pharmacy dispensing reports were generated for pharmacist review and anticoagulant drug therapy changes were recommended to physicians where appropriate. The primary objective was to describe the number and type of recommendations made. Secondary objectives were to determine the provider acceptance rate based on the intervention type and on clinical vs formulary recommendations. Results: Clinical pharmacists made 147 recommendations for 2331 unique patients included in the analysis. Twenty-three recommendations (16%) were to decrease the dose, 46 (31%) were to increase the dose, 14 (10%) were to change the medication due to clinical scenario, 62 (42%) were to change the medication due to cost, and 2 (1%) were another issue. One hundred twenty-three (84%) recommendations were accepted. The provider acceptance rate was similar for clinical and formulary recommendations (85% and 82% respectively). Conclusion: Implementation of report-driven clinical pharmacist intervention led to an improvement in appropriate DOAC medication selection and dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This manuscript is a consensus document of an expert panel on the Evaluation and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Taking Anticoagulants Presenting to the Emergency Department, sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Landmark clinical trials have expended the indications for the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but contemporary data on usage and expenditure patterns are lacking. Objective: This study aimed to assess annual trends in oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization and expenditure across the United States (US) from 2014 to 2020. Methods: We utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to study the trends of use and expenditures of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban between 2014 and 2020 in the US. Survey respondents reported OAC use within the past year, which was verified against pharmacy records. Payment information was obtained from the respondent's pharmacy and was categorized as third-party or self/out-of-pocket. Potential indications and medical conditions of interest for OAC therapy were identified from respondent-reported medical conditions. We estimated the national number of OAC users and total expenditures across age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and medical condition subgroups. Trends of OAC users' characteristics, expenditure, and number of prescriptions were evaluated using the Mann–Kendall test for trends. Results: Between 2014 and 2020, the number of warfarin users decreased from 3.8 million (70% of all OAC users) to 2.2 million (p = 0.007) [29% of all OAC users], while the number of DOAC users increased from 1.6 million (30% of all OAC users) to 5.4 million (p = 0.003) [70% of all OAC users]. The total expenditure of OACs in the US increased from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $17.8 billion in 2020 (p = 0.003), which was driven by the increase in DOAC expenditures (p = 0.003). Conclusions: DOACs have replaced warfarin as the preferred OAC in the US. The increased costs associated with DOAC use may decline when generic formulations are approved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation and closure of incompetent saphenous veins have become increasingly utilized since its approval for use in the United States in 2015. This increase in usage necessitates a societal update to guide treatment and ensure optimal and consistent patient outcomes. Method: The American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an expert panel to write an updated Position Statement with explanations and recommendations for the appropriate use of cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation for patients with venous insufficiency. Result: A Position Statement was produced by the expert panel with recommendations for appropriate use, treatment technique, outcomes review, and potential adverse events. Their recommendations were reviewed, edited, and approved by the Guidelines Committee of the Society. Conclusion: This societal Position Statement provides a useful document for reference for physicians and venous specialists to assist in the appropriate use of cyanoacrylate endovenous ablation in the treatment of patients with venous insufficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Due to the risk of thrombosis, nearly all children supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) receive systemic anticoagulation. While heparin has traditionally been used, there are reports of increased use of direct thrombin inhibitors. We sought to describe the use of anticoagulation in children supported by ECMO in the United States using a large administrative database. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children supported by ECMO within the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Pediatric encounters involving ECMO from 2012 to 2020 were identified. Data regarding demographics, diagnoses, anticoagulation, complications, and outcomes were extracted for eligible encounters. Results: Eleven thousand five hundred ninety-five encounters that involved ECMO were identified. Fifty-four percent were male with an age range of 0–17 years and a median (IQR) age of 0 (0–2) years. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) only was used in 94% (95% CI: 93.6–94.5%) of encounters and UFH followed by bivalirudin in 5% (95% CI: 4.3–5.1%) of cases. There was a significant difference in the use of bivalirudin from 2012 to 2020 (p < 0.001). Differences in anticoagulation regimens were observed between infants and children (p = 0.004) and between those with and without cardiac indications for ECMO (p < 0.001). Four percent (95% CI: 4.1–4.8%) of encounters were associated with diagnostic coding for thrombosis and differences in occurrence of thrombosis were observed between different anticoagulant regimens (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Though the majority of children on ECMO in the United States receive heparin anticoagulation, there is an increase in use of direct thrombin inhibitors. Prospective studies must evaluate the efficacy of different anticoagulants in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thromboembolic events related to invasive electrophysiology studies, while rare, can have devastating consequences. Use of systemic anticoagulation for a pediatric or adult‐congenital invasive electrophysiology study is recommended, however there is no established standard of practice in this population. Objective: To report on procedural practices for thromboembolism prophylaxis during invasive electrophysiology studies for pediatric patients and adults with congenital heart disease. Methods: An anonymous web‐based survey was sent to the members of the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society. The survey focused on pre‐procedural, intra‐procedural, and post‐procedural thromboembolism prophylaxis practices during invasive electrophysiology studies. Significant practice variation was defined as <90% concordance among respondents. Results: Survey was completed by 73 members; 52 (71%) practicing in the United States, 65 (89%) practicing in an academic institution, and 14 (19%) in an institution that performs more than 200 invasive electrophysiology procedures annually. Responses showed significant variation in practice. Prior to an invasive electrophysiology procedure, 25% discontinue aspirin while 47% discontinue anticoagulants. Heparin is given for all procedures by 32%. When heparin is administered, the first dose is given by 32% after sheaths are placed, 42% after crossing into the systemic atrium, and 26% just prior to systemic‐side ablation. Most target an activated clotting time between 200–300 seconds. Post systemic‐side ablation, 58% do not initiate a heparin infusion. Post‐procedural oral agents were initiated on day of procedure by 34% of respondents and on post‐procedure day 1 by 53%. If treating with aspirin, 74% use low‐dose (3–5 mg/kg or 81 mg daily), and 68% treat for 4–6 weeks. Conclusion: There is significant variation in thromboembolism prophylaxis for invasive EP studies among pediatric and congenital electrophysiologists. Further studies are needed to optimize the management of thromboembolism prophylaxis in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have elevated risk of recurrent VTE (rVTE) and major bleeding (MB). The risk is even higher within those with a prior bleeding event or renal disease. There is a need to understand the risk of rVTE and MB of commonly used anticoagulants among these high-risk patients. VTE patients with active cancer and treated with apixaban, warfarin, or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 30 days of VTE were identified from five claims databases in the United States. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance patient characteristics. The post-IPTW population was stratified by prior bleed or renal disease status. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate interactions between treatment and prior bleed or renal disease on risk of rVTE and MB, with p value <.1 considered significant. Study criteria were met by 30,586 VTE cancer patients: 35.0% had prior bleed and 29.0% had renal disease. For apixaban, LMWH, and warfarin cohorts, the incidence (events per 100 person-years) of MB was higher in patients with prior bleed (17.48 vs 7.58, 25.61 vs 13.11, and 20.38 vs 8.97) or renal disease (15.79 vs 8.71, 22.11 vs 15.90, and 18.49 vs 10.39) vs those without the conditions. Generally, there were no significant interactions between anticoagulant use and prior bleed or renal disease on rVTE and MB (p for interaction >.1). The incidence of MB was higher among those with prior bleed or renal disease. Effects of apixaban, warfarin, or LMWH were generally consistent regardless of prior bleed or renal disease status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Deaths from high‐risk pulmonary embolism (PE) appear to have increased in the US over the last decade. Modifiable risks contributing to this worrisome trend present opportunities for physicians, researchers, and healthcare policymakers to improve care. Methods: We sought to contextualize contemporary, high‐risk PE epidemiology and examine clinical trials, quality improvement opportunities, and healthcare policy initiatives directed at reducing mortality. Results: We observed significant and modifiable excess mortality due to high‐risk PE. We identified several opportunities to improve care including: (1) rapid translation of forthcoming data on reperfusion strategies into clinical practice; (2) improved risk stratification tools; (3) quality improvement initiatives to address presumptive anticoagulation practice gaps; and (3) adoption of health policy initiatives to establish pulmonary embolism response teams and address the social determinants of health. Conclusion: Addressing knowledge and practice gaps in intermediate and high‐risk PE management must be prioritized and informed by forthcoming high‐quality data. Implementation efforts are needed to improve acute PE management and resolve treatment disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Previous studies suggest that quality improvement initiatives focused on hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism have a positive impact on prescribing rates of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, especially those that incorporate computerized changes. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement project to determine whether education and computerized prescriber order entry system changes affect venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance rates in hospitalized medical patients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2023, 37,739 non-surgical, adult patient encounters with a length of stay > 48 h were analyzed in our study. From 18 December 2021 to 8 March 2022, provider education was delivered to the three largest admitting services, and computerized prescriber order entry changes were implemented incorporating a mandatory requirement to either order venous thromboembolism prophylaxis or document a contraindication for all patients at moderate venous thromboembolism risk. Results: Monthly venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance rates, as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services VTE-1 metric, increased from a mean of 74% to 93% after the interventions. This change was driven primarily by an increased utilization of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis from 37% to 53%. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that a multi-faceted intervention incorporating provider education and computerized prescriber order entry system changes can significantly increase venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance rates in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The optimal method for monitoring of anticoagulation in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between anti-factor Xa level (anti-Xa; IU/mL) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT; seconds) for monitoring intravenous unfractionated heparin anticoagulation in adult ECLS patients. Methods: Charts of all adult patients cannulated for ECLS from 2015 through 2017 were reviewed and laboratory and heparin infusion data were extracted for analysis. Time matched pairs of anti-Xa and aPTT were considered concordant if both laboratory values were within the same clinically utilized range. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with discordance while accounting for patient level effects. Results: A total of 1016 paired anti-Xa and aPTT values from 65 patients were evaluated. 500 (49.2%) paired samples were discordant with a degree of variability on linear regression (r 2 = 0.315). The aPTT fell into a higher therapeutic range compared to the anti-Xa in 31.6% and lower in 17.3%. Logistic regression demonstrated that discordance was independently associated with time from initiation of ECLS (OR 1.17 per day, p < 0.001), average heparin infusion rate (OR 1.25 per U/kg/hr, p < 0.001), and INR (OR 3.22, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Nearly half of all aPTT and anti-Xa values were in discordant ranges and discordance is more likely as the time on ECLS and the INR level increase. The use of either assay in isolation to guide heparin anticoagulation may lead to misestimation of the degree of anticoagulation in complex ECLS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite clear, relatively easy-to-use guidance, many clinicians find the preoperative management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) challenging. Inappropriate management can delay procedures and lead to haemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. We aimed to describe preoperative management practices regarding DOACs in a tertiary hospital and clinicians' adherence to in-house recommendations. Method: We included all patients being treated with DOACs who underwent elective surgery in 2019 and 2020 (n = 337). In-house recommendations for perioperative management were largely comparable to the 2022 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Results: Typical patients were older adults with multiple comorbidities and high thrombotic risk stratification scores, and 65.6% (n = 221) had not undergone recommended preoperative anticoagulation management protocols. Patients operated on using local anaesthesia (adjusted OR = 0.30, 95%CI 0.14–0.66; p < 0.01) were less likely to have been treated following institutional recommendations, but no association between their procedure's bleeding risk and adherence was found. Clinicians' failures to adhere to recommendations mostly involved late or non-indicated interruptions of anticoagulation treatment (n = 89, 26.4%) or inappropriate heparin bridging (n = 54, 16.0%). Forty-five (13.3%) procedures had to be postponed. Incorrect preoperative anticoagulation management was directly responsible for 12/45 postponements (26.7% of postponements). Conclusion: This study highlights clinicians' low adherence rates to institutional recommendations for patients treated with DOACs scheduled for elective surgery in a tertiary hospital centre. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical study addressing the issue of clinicians' adherence to guidelines for the preoperative management of DOACs. Going beyond the issue of whether clinicians are knowledgeable about guidelines or have them available, this study questions how generalisable guidelines are in a tertiary hospital managing many highly polymorbid patients. Further studies should identify the causes of poor adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atrial fibrillation is a common cause of stroke among older adults and is often first detected during hospitalization, given frequent use of cardiac telemetry. Methods: In a 20% national sample of Medicare fee‐for‐service beneficiaries, we identified patients aged 65‐or‐older newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation while hospitalized in 2016. Our primary outcome was an oral anticoagulant claim within 7‐days of discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed relationships between anticoagulation initiation and thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores while controlling for demographics, frailty, comorbidities, and hospitalization characteristics. Results: Among 38,379 older adults newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation while hospitalized (mean age 78.2 [SD 8.4]; 51.8% female; 83.3% white), 36,633 (95.4%) had an indication for anticoagulation and 24.6% (9011) of those initiated an oral anticoagulant following discharge. Higher CHA2DS2‐VASc score was associated with a small increase in oral anticoagulant initiation (predicted probability 20.5% [95% CI, 18.7%–22.3%] for scores <2 and 24.9% [CI, 24.4%–25.4%] for ≥4). Elevated HAS‐BLED score was associated with a small decrease in probability of anticoagulant initiation (25.4% [CI, 24.4%–26.4%] for score <2 and 23.1% [CI, 22.5%–23.8%] for ≥3). Frailty was associated with decreased likelihood of oral anticoagulant initiation (24.7% [CI, 23.2%–26.2%] for non‐frail and 18.1% [CI, 16.6%–19.6%] for moderately‐severely frail). Anticoagulant initiation varied by primary reason for hospitalization, with predicted probability highest among patients with a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (46.1% [CI, 45.0%–47.3%]) and lowest among those with non‐cardiovascular conditions (13.8% [CI, 13.3%–14.3%]) and bleeds (3.6% [CI, 2.4%–4.8%]). Conclusions: Oral anticoagulant initiation is uncommon among older adults newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation during hospitalization, even among patients hospitalized primarily for atrial fibrillation and patients with high thromboembolic risk. Clinicians should discuss risks and benefits of oral anticoagulants with all inpatients found to have atrial fibrillation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nonadherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) is a challenge to stroke risk reduction in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data on primary medication nonadherence (PMN) in NVAF are lacking. Objectives: Our aim was to assess the rates and predictors of PMN among NVAF patients who were newly prescribed an OAC. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis of linked healthcare claims and electronic health record data. Adult NVAF patients with a prescription order for an OAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or warfarin) between January 2016 and June 2019 were identified (date of first prescription order = index date). Patients had a 1-year baseline and a 6-month post-index period to assess the rates of PMN, defined as having a prescription order but no paid claim for any OAC on or within 30 days after the index date. Sensitivity analyses explored 60-, 90- and 180-day PMN thresholds. Logistic regression models were used to examine the predictors of PMN. Results: Among 20,393 patients, the overall 30-day PMN rate was 28.4%; PMN rates decreased to 17% with a 180-day threshold. PMN was numerically lowest for warfarin among OACs and numerically lowest for apixaban among direct OACs. A CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 3, commercial insurance, and African American race were associated with higher odds of PMN. Conclusions: More than one-quarter of patients experienced PMN within 30 days of their initial prescription order. This rate decreased over a longer period, suggesting a delay in fills. Understanding the factors associated with PMN is warranted to develop effective interventions for improving OAC treatment rates in NVAF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

See the Reply by Semla and Steinman in this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms (DVBFAs) have poor natural history when left untreated and high morbimortality when treated with microsurgery. Flow diversion (FD) with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is feasible but carries high risk of perforator occlusion and progression of brainstem compression. Elaborate antithrombotic strategies are needed to preserve perforator patency while vessel remodeling occurs. We compared triple therapy (TT (DAPT plus oral anticoagulation)) and DAPT alone in patients with DVBFAs treated with FD. Methods Retrospective comparison of DAPT and TT in patients with DVBFAs treated with FD at eight US centers. Results The groups (DAPT=13, TT=14) were similar in age, sex, clinical presentation, baseline disability, and aneurysm characteristics. Radial access use was significantly higher in the TT group (71.4% vs 15.3%; P=0.006). Median number of flow diverters and adjunctive coiling use were non-different between groups. Acute ischemic stroke rate during the oral anticoagulation period was lower in the TT group than the DAPT group (7.1% vs 30.8%; P=0.167). Modified Rankin Scale score decline was significantly lower in the TT group (7.1% vs 69.2%; P=0.001). Overall rates of hemorrhagic complications (TT, 28.6% vs DAPT, 7.7%; P=0.162) and complete occlusion (TT, 25% vs DAPT, 54.4%; P=0.213) were non-different between the groups. Rate of moderate-to-severe disability at last follow-up was significantly lower in the TT group (21.4% vs 76.9%; P=0.007). Conclusions Patients with DVBFAs treated with FD in the TT group had fewer ischemic strokes, less symptom progression, and overall better outcomes at last follow-up than similar patients in the DAPT group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are favorable in stroke prevention for geriatric patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation versus warfarin. These anticoagulants do not require international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and have lower food/drug interactions. In addition, NOACs have risk reduction in bleeding and all-cause mortality compared with warfarin. Local problem: At a geriatric primary care practice, two registered nurses manage 88 patients on warfarin for INR monitoring. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide oversight for warfarin titration after abnormal results. The goal of this quality-improvement project was to decrease the time spent monitoring patients on warfarin. Methods: Primary care providers and cardiologists of patients on warfarin were contacted to gain approval of transition to a NOAC. The NP reviewed patients' renal function and the indication for anticoagulation and then created a list of eligible patients for transition. Interventions: Patients eligible for transition to NOACs were contacted for their consent. The transition process included stopping warfarin, ordering apixaban, ordering INR level, educating about starting apixaban, and coordinating appropriate follow-up. Results: Of 88 patients on warfarin, 21 were eligible for conversion from warfarin to apixaban. Of these 21 patients, 66% (n = 14) consented to the conversion. Of those who were not converted to apixaban, five declined due to cost and two were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: There was a reduction in nurses' monthly monitoring of patients on warfarin by 22%. Transition to NOAC was not only beneficial for patient safety and efficacy but also reduced nursing clinical time for anticoagulation encounters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Antithrombotic agents have a role in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment, but the pandemic disrupted medication supply. This study examined changes in the volume of oral and parenteral anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications at US hospitals during the pandemic. Methods IQVIA National Sales Perspective (NSP) data was used to determine the monthly volume of anticoagulants and antiplatelets purchased at US hospitals between January 2018 and February 2021. Mean monthly medication volumes, reported as extended units (EUs), and year-over-year changes in medication volume were determined. A single-group interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate changes in the rate of growth of monthly medication volumes before (January 2019-February 2020) and during (March 2020-February 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Overall, there was a 43.4% decline in the total volume of anticoagulants and antiplatelets at US hospitals in March 2020, driven by a decrease in heparin volume. Mean monthly volumes decreased significantly (P < 0.05) for parenteral anticoagulants (–106,691,340 EU [95% CI, –200,033,910 to –13,348,780]), oral anticoagulants (–354,800 EU [95% CI, –612,180 to –97,420]), and parenteral antiplatelets (–391,880 EU [95% CI, –535,420 to –248,330]). During the pandemic, the monthly volume of oral anticoagulants, parenteral anticoagulants, and parenteral antiplatelets grew significantly more than in the prepandemic period. This growth was primarily seen in volumes of apixaban, argatroban, enoxaparin, heparin, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. Apixaban and heparin volumes continued a prepandemic uptrend, while argatroban and eptifibatide volumes reversed trend. Conclusion Rapid changes in anticoagulant and antiplatelet volume at US hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic highlight the need for institutional protocols to manage fluctuating medication volume demands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pancreatic cancer is known to cause a hypercoagulable state and increase the risk of thrombosis. While long-term systemic anticoagulation is a treatment option to reduce this risk, its effectiveness remains ambiguous. In this retrospective study, data from the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample database were extracted and compared statistically to find the solution. The results showed that pancreatic cancer patients who had received long-term systemic anticoagulant had a lower risk of sepsis, shock, acute kidney injury, and in-hospital mortality, and a shorter hospital stay. The results suggest that long-term systemic anticoagulation should be considered as a treatment option for pancreatic cancer patients. Background: Pancreatic cancer can induce a hypercoagulable state which may lead to clinically apparent thrombosis. However, the effect of anticoagulants remains ambiguous. This study aimed to investigate the potential effect of long-term systemic anticoagulant usage on hospitalization outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: This retrospective study extracted all data from the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005 to 2018. We included hospitalized adults ≥18 years old with a pancreatic cancer diagnosis identified by International Classification of Diseases ninth revision (ICD-9) and tenth revision (ICD-10) codes. We utilized diagnostic codes ICD9 V58.61 and ICD10 Z79.01, i.e., 'long-term use of anticoagulant', to identify individuals who were on a long-term systemic anticoagulant. The study cohort were then further grouped as being with or without long-term systemic use of an anticoagulant. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the characteristics of the two groups. The risks of life-threatening events, e.g., acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute heart failure (AHF), sepsis, shock, and acute kidney injury (AKI), in-hospital death, and prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the hospital were compared between the groups by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: The study population consisted of 242,903 hospitalized patients with pancreas cancer, 6.5% (n = 15,719) of whom were on long-term systemic anticoagulants. A multivariable regression analysis showed that long-term systemic anticoagulant use was independently associated with lower odds of sepsis (aOR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76–0.85), shock (aOR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.51–0.68), AKI (aOR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81–0.91), in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.60–0.70), and prolonged LOS (aOR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89). Conclusions: Long-term systemic anticoagulant use is associated with better clinical outcomes in terms of decreased risks of some life-threatening events, in-hospital death, and prolonged LOS among hospitalized patients with pancreatic cancer in the U.S. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, little is known regarding pharmacists' practice patterns and preferences in clinical areas of contention, such as initiation dosing, obesity, and renal impairment. Objective: To determine pharmacist trends in practice regarding DOACs for the treatment of VTE overall and within areas of clinical controversy. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to pharmacists in the United States through national and state pharmacy organizations. Responses were collected for 30 days. Results: One hundred fifty-three complete responses were submitted. The majority of pharmacists preferred apixaban (90.2%) for the oral treatment of venous thromboembolism. When initiating apixaban or rivaroxaban for a new VTE, 76% and 64% of pharmacists surveyed, respectively, state the duration of the initiation dose phases are reduced if the patient received parenteral anticoagulation. Fifty-eight percent of pharmacists used body mass index to evaluate the appropriateness of DOACs in obese patients whereas 42% used total body weight. Preference for rivaroxaban (31.4%) was higher in this population compared to the global population (10%). Apixaban was preferred for patients with renal impairment (92.2%). However, as creatinine clearance as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (CrCl) reduced to ≤15 milliliters/minute (mL/min), preference for warfarin increased (36%). Conclusion: This national survey of pharmacists demonstrated an overall preference for apixaban and significant variability in practice patterns regarding DOACs for patients with new VTE, patients with obesity, and patients with renal impairment. Further research is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC initiation dosing phase modifications. Prospective evaluations of DOACs in obese and renal dysfunction populations would confirm the safety and efficacy of DOACs in these populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Over 6 million people in the United States require anticoagulation. Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin for select indications due to increased safety and similar efficacy. However, data suggest warfarin to DOAC conversion occurs in less than 5% of patients. Objectives: To assess rates of conversion from warfarin to DOACs and the rate of inpatient pharmacist assessment for warfarin to DOAC conversions using an evidence‐based DOAC checklist. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients ≥18 years old admitted on warfarin from January 1, 2018 to February 28, 2020 were identified via query of the electronic health record (EHR). Patients were excluded if discharged to hospice or if anticoagulation was permanently discontinued. In January 2019, an evidence‐based checklist was developed by the inpatient antithrombosis stewardship team and embedded into an EHR‐based standardized clinical documentation form prompting pharmacist assessment for DOAC therapy. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were utilized to compare pre‐ and post‐implementation rates of pharmacist‐driven evaluation for warfarin to DOAC switch along with actual conversion rates. Additional outcomes were documented reasons for not switching and proportion of newly‐switched patients referred to our antithrombosis clinic. Results: Ultimately, 538 inpatient encounters were included (237 pre‐implementation of the DOAC eligibility checklist; 301 post‐implementation). Warfarin to DOAC conversions increased from a mean of 1.08 patients/month pre‐implementation of the DOAC eligibility checklist to 3.62 patients/month post‐implementation (p < 0.0001). Likewise, pharmacist evaluation for switch increased significantly from a mean of 2.00 patients/month pre‐implementation of the DOAC eligibility checklist to 17.69 patients/month post‐implementation (p < 0.0001). In addition, referrals to the anticoagulation clinic significantly increased from a mean of 1.08–4.08 patients/month (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Use of an evidence‐based checklist embedded into the inpatient EHR increased warfarin to DOAC conversions and supported overall antithrombosis stewardship efforts. Conversion rates remained fairly low. Further opportunity exists to optimize patient safety and health systems savings with ongoing stewardship efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on comparing the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). It mentions the study found that DOACs have similar efficacy and safety profiles compared to conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of PE, suggesting that DOACs offer practical advantages such as ease of use and no need for monitoring.

Rationale, Aims and Objectives: Critics have charged that evidence‐based medicine (EBM) overemphasises algorithmic rules over unstructured clinical experience and intuition, but the role of structured decision support systems in improving health outcomes remains uncertain. We aim to assess if delivery of anticoagulant prophylaxis in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 according to an algorithm based on evidence‐based clinical practice guideline (CPG) improved clinical outcomes compared with administration of anticoagulant treatment given at individual practitioners' discretion. Methods: An observational design consisting of the analysis of all acutely ill, consecutive patients (n = 1783) with confirmed COVID‐19 diagnosis admitted between 10 March 2020 to 11 January 2022 to an US academic center. American Society of Haematology CPG for anticoagulant prophylaxis in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 was converted into a clinical pathway and translated into fast‐and‐frugal decision (FFT) tree ('algorithm'). We compared delivery of anticoagulant prophylaxis in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 according to the FFT algorithm with administration of anticoagulant treatment given at individual practitioners' discretion. Results: In an adjusted analysis, using combination of Lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and propensity score based weighting [augmented inverse‐probability weighting] statistical techniques controlling for cluster data, the algorithm did not reduce death, venous thromboembolism, or major bleeding, but helped avoid longer hospital stay [number of patients needed to be treated (NNT) = 40 (95% CI: 23–143), indicating that for every 40 patients (23–143) managed on FFT algorithm, one avoided staying in hospital longer than 10 days] and averted admission to intensive‐care unit (ICU) [NNT = 19 (95% CI: 13–40)]. All model's selected covariates were well balanced. The results remained robust to sensitivity analyses used to test the stability of the findings. Conclusions: When delivered using a structured FFT algorithm, CPG shortened the hospital stay and help avoided admission to ICU, but it did not affect other relevant outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Palliative care (PC) pharmacists can play an important role in optimizing medications for patients with serious illnesses by aligning patients' goals with their treatment regimens. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify successful pharmacist deprescribing interventions incorporated in the hospital discharge plan and (2) describe deprescribing interventions by medication class, reason for discontinuation, and perception of patient/caregiver understanding and acceptance. Methods: This pilot study included 45 inpatient PC consultations and collected data on deprescribing interventions performed by PC clinical pharmacists in Maryland and Washington, D.C., U.S. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes. Results: Eighty-two percent of recommendations were successfully implemented during hospitalization and included in the discharge plan. Medication classes recommended for discontinuation included vitamins/supplements (20%), antidiabetics (13%), antiplatelets (10%), anticoagulants (10%), statins (10%), antihypertensives (7%), proton pump inhibitors/H2 blockers (7%), antibiotics (5%), dementia medications (1%), and antidepressants (1%). Top reasons for discontinuation included pill burden, unacceptable treatment burden, and potential harm outweighs potential benefit. Conclusions: Results of this study demonstrate PC pharmacists' deprescribing recommendations have a high rate of successful implementation by the primary inpatient care team. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Routine long-term anticoagulation in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is controversial. To date, anticoagulation has been found to be beneficial or neutral in idiopathic disease (IPAH) and neutral-to-harmful in connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH). We sought to examine the association between anticoagulation and mortality, healthcare utilization, and quality of life (QoL) in PAH. The PHAR is a prospective registry of PAH patients referred to 58 pulmonary hypertension care centers in the United States. We compared patients who received anticoagulation during enrollment (questionnaire documented) to those who did not. Cox proportional hazard models were used for mortality, Poisson multivariate regression models for healthcare utilization, and generalized estimating equations for QOL Of 1175 patients included, 316 patients were treated with anticoagulation. IPAH/hereditary PAH (HPAH) comprised 46% of the cohort and CTD-PAH comprised 33%. After adjustment for demographics, clinical characteristics, site and disease severity, anticoagulation was not associated with mortality in the overall population (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72-1.36), IPAH/HPAH (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94), or CTD-PAH (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-1.42). Anticoagulation was associated with an increased rate of emergency department visits (IRR: 1.41), hospitalizations (IRR: 1.30), and hospital days (IRR 1.33). QOL measured by emPHasis-10 score was worse in patients receiving anticoagulation (mean difference 1.74; 95% CI 0.40-3.09). Anticoagulation is not associated with higher mortality, but is associated with increased healthcare utilization in the PHAR. PAH-specific QoL may be worse in patients receiving anticoagulation. The risks and benefits surrounding routine prescription of anticoagulation for PAH should be carefully considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is the preferred continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) anticoagulation strategy for children in the USA. Nafamostat mesilate (NM), a synthetic serine protease, is used widely for CKRT anticoagulation in Japan and Korea. We compared the safety and efficacy of NM to RCA for pediatric CKRT. Methods: Starting June 2019, the most recent 100 medical records of children receiving CKRT with either RCA or NM were reviewed retrospectively, at one children's hospital in Japan (NM) and one in the USA (RCA). The number of hours a single CKRT filter was in use, was the primary outcome. Safety was assessed by bleeding complications for the NM group and citrate toxicity leading to RCA discontinuation or electrolyte imbalance in the RCA group. Results: Eighty patients received NM and 78 patients received RCA. Median filter life was longer for the NM group (NM: 38 [22, 74] vs. RCA: 36 [17, 66] h, p = 0.02). When filter life was censored for discontinuation other than clotting, the 60-h survival rate was higher for RCA (71% vs. 54%). The hazard ratio comparing NM over RCA varied over time (HR 0.7; 0.2–1.5, p = 0.33 at 0 h to HR 5.5; 1.3–23.7, p = 0.334 at 72 h). The lack of difference in filter survival persisted controlling for filter surface area, catheter diameter, and pre-CKRT platelet count. Major bleeding rates did not differ between groups (NM: 5% vs. RCA: 9%). Conclusions: RCA and NM provide satisfactory anticoagulation for CKRT in children with no difference in major bleeding rates. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Data on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in neonates are limited. We aimed to identify and describe the incidence, presentation, and clinical outcomes of neonatal COVID-19. METHODS: Over 1 million neonatal encounters at 109 United States health systems, from March 2020 to February 2021, were extracted from the Cerner Real World Database. COVID-19 diagnosis was assessed using severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) laboratory tests and diagnosis codes. Incidence of COVID-19 per 100 000 encounters was estimated. RESULTS: COVID-19 was diagnosed in 918 (0.1%) neonates (91.1 per 100 000 encounters [95% confidence interval 85.3-97.2]). Of these, 71 (7.7%) had severe infection (7 per 100 000 [95% confidence interval 5.5-8.9]). Median time to diagnosis was 14.5 days from birth (interquartile range 3.1-24.2). Common signs of infection were tachypnea and fever. Those with severe infection were more likely to receive respiratory support (50.7% vs 5.2%, P < .001). Severely ill neonates received analgesia (38%), antibiotics (33.8%), anticoagulants (32.4%), corticosteroids (26.8%), remdesivir (2.8%), and COVID-19 convalescent plasma (1.4%). A total of 93.6% neonates were discharged home after care, 1.1% were transferred to another hospital, and discharge disposition was unknown for 5.2%. One neonate (0.1%) with presentation suggestive of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children died after 11 days of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Most neonates infected with SARS-CoV-2 were asymptomatic or developed mild illness without need for respiratory support. Some had severe illness requiring treatment of COVID-19 with remdesivir and COVID-19 convalescent plasma. SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates, though rare, may result in severe disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a novel severe postinfectious condition associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The purpose of this report is to describe nationwide trends in the evolving clinical management of MIS-C. Methods Patients with MIS-C were reported from state and local jurisdictions to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) MIS-C national surveillance system. Patients' case reports were reviewed to ensure that they met the CDC MIS-C case definition and had sufficient data for analysis. The prevalence of use of treatments for MIS-C, temporal trends in use of these treatments, and frequency of administration of different treatment combinations were analyzed. Results There were 4470 patients meeting the MIS-C case definition with onset dates from 19 February 2020 to 31 July 2021. The proportion of patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) has declined over time, from 78.7% in April 2020 to 57.5% in June 2021 (P  = .001). The most common treatments were intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), given to 85.6% of patients; steroids (77.7%), and antiplatelet medications (73.7%); use of each of these treatments has increased over time, particularly in patients not requiring admission to an ICU (all P  < .001). Older patients and non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to receive additional modes of therapy including vasoactive medication, noninvasive respiratory support, anticoagulation medication, and intubation/mechanical ventilation. Conclusions IVIG, steroids, and antiplatelet medication have become increasingly utilized as standard treatment for MIS-C patients, while the use of other treatments may be contingent on the type and severity of clinical findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is performed worldwide. To attract patients, hospitals frequently have webpages that tout the success of the procedure. The information disseminated to the public via these webpages has not been systematically reviewed. Our objective was to assess accuracy of information delivered to the public on hospital websites in regard to atrial AF ablation. Methods: From July 2019 to January 2020, we performed a Google search for all US hospitals registered with Medicare to see if they had a webpage describing AF ablation. Resulting hospital webpages were abstracted for data on AF ablation success rates and risks. Success rates over 86%, the highest success rate in the medical literature, were deemed exaggerated. Results: Among 4805 hospitals, 487 had webpages describing AF ablation and 33 discussed success rates of AF ablation. Twelve percentage reported exaggerated success rates, 3% referred to ablation as a cure, and 2.8% referred to ablation as a tool to eliminate AF. Less than 10% of webpages describing AF ablation noted the potential need for a second ablation to achieve the stated success rate and merely 16% mentioned risks of the procedure. One percentage of webpages directly suggested AF ablation could reduce risk of stroke while others indirectly suggested it by discussing cessation of anticoagulation. Two webpages mentioned reduced mortality. Conclusion: US hospital webpages rarely discuss AF ablation. When discussed, there were concerning unsubstantiated claims regarding mortality, stroke prevention, and need for medical therapy. This could lead to some patients undergoing AF ablation based on faulty understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with hereditary antithrombin deficiency (HAD) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) 12: HAD Pilot Project established a registry to collect data on patients with HAD., Objectives: To inform current practice and serve as a platform to design a multicenter global registry for patients with HAD., Methods: The HAD registry was designed in 2020 to identify 100 patients with HAD receiving care at ATHN-affiliated centers. Demographics, type of HAD, thrombotic events, risk factors, anticoagulants, and antithrombin (AT) concentrate administration were recorded., Results: Ninety-four patients were included; 65% were females; 51% had type 1 HAD. Mean age at diagnosis was 26 years (SD, 18 years); 61% had VTE: 55% deep vein thrombosis and 27% pulmonary embolisms. Eight patients had arterial thrombosis. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 58.6% of patients (44.8%) despite anticoagulation. The main risk factor for thrombosis in females was estrogen. Direct oral anticoagulants were prescribed in 30%, heparin in 34%, and warfarin in 32%. There were 139 pregnancies. Low-molecular-weight heparin was administered in 33% and AT concentrate in 19% and 11% prior to and after delivery, respectively. Twelve patients developed thrombosis in pregnancy. Seventy-nine patients underwent 239 surgeries or procedures, mainly gastrointestinal and vascular. Overall, 35% of participants received AT concentrate without adverse events., Conclusion: In ATHN 12, VTE was the predominant manifestation, frequently recurrent. There was a trend toward using direct oral anticoagulants. Low-molecular-weight heparin was administered in one-third of pregnancies and AT concentrate in one-fifth without adverse events. These data should encourage prospective studies to optimize the management of these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.T.D.: participation on Pharmacosmos Advisory Board and member of American Society of Hematology Panel on Practice Guidelines for Anticoagulation in COVID-19. E.S.: no conflict of interest. J.C.R.: has received honorarium from F. Hoffman-La Roche AG, Genentech, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. M.D.T.: received consulting fees from Pfizer, Sanofi, Sobi-Swedish Orphan, Biovitrum, Takeda Amgen, Octapharma Inc, Genentech, BioMarin, UCB Biosciences Dova Pharmaceuticals, and Novo Nordisk and payment/honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational event from Sobi-Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Genentech, Amgen, Novartis, BioMarin, and Sanofi. J.S.: no conflict of interest. J.C.: no conflict of interest. M.R.: consulting for Catalyst Biosciences, CSL Behring, Genentech, Hema Biologics, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and uniQure and leadership or fiduciary role in Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders; Partners in Bleeding Disorders, Thrombosis and Hemostasis Societies of North America., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trial recruitment of Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) is key for interventions that interact with socioeconomic factors and cultural norms, preferences, and values. We report on our experience enrolling BIPOC participants into a multicenter trial of a shared decision-making intervention about anticoagulation to prevent strokes, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods: We enrolled patients with AF and their clinicians in 5 healthcare systems (three academic medical centers, an urban/suburban community medical center, and a safety-net inner-city medical center) located in three states (Minnesota, Alabama, and Mississippi) in the United States. Clinical encounters were randomized to usual care with or without a shared decision-making tool about anticoagulation.Analysis: We analyzed BIPOC patient enrollment by site, categorized reasons for non-enrollment, and examined how enrollment of BIPOC patients was promoted across sites.Results: Of 2247 patients assessed, 922 were enrolled of which 147 (16%) were BIPOC patients. Eligible Black participants were significantly less likely (p < .001) to enroll (102, 11%) than trial-eligible White participants (185, 15%). The enrollment rate of BIPOC patients varied by site. The inclusion and prioritization of clinical practices that care for more BIPOC patients contributed to a higher enrollment rate into the trial. Specific efforts to reach BIPOC clinic attendees and prioritize their enrollment had lower yield.Conclusions: Best practices to optimize the enrollment of BIPOC participants into trials that examined complex and culturally sensitive interventions remain to be developed. This study suggests a high yield from enrolling BIPOC patients from practices that prioritize their care.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905032). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with left ventricular thrombus are at high risk for ischemic stroke and systemic embolization. The mainstay of treatment is anticoagulation, but it remains unclear if direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a safe and effective treatment strategy compared to warfarin. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in an integrated health system in the United States. Methods: Consecutive patients with left ventricular thrombus on transthoracic echocardiogram from May 2010 to April 2020 were identified. Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs and warfarin were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Among 433 patients with left ventricular thrombus, 134 (30.9%) were treated with DOACs and 299 (69.1%) were treated with warfarin. Patients were followed for a median of 3.4 years. For the primary effectiveness outcome of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and transient ischemic attack, no significant difference was observed between use of DOACs compared to warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–1.18, p = 0.21). For the primary safety outcome of intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other bleed requiring hospitalization, DOAC usage was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.87, p = 0.0008). Conclusions: In this diverse population-based cohort of patients, DOAC treatment for left ventricular thrombus appears to be as safe and effective as warfarin treatment. These findings support the use of DOACs for patients with left ventricular thrombus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence is needed on the impact of anticoagulation therapy on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this analysis, which is part of the CALLIPER study, was to investigate the risk of worsening kidney function with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily compared with warfarin in patients with AF and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) in routine clinical practice in the United States. CALLIPER was an observational, retrospective, new-user cohort study. Adult patients with AF in the US IBM Watson MarketScan databases who newly initiated anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily or warfarin between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Comparative analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression after adjustment for potential confounding by the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting approach and propensity score matching. One of the main study outcomes was worsening kidney function (composite of progression to CKD stage 5, kidney failure, or need for dialysis), besides traditional AF-related outcomes. The cohort included 7368 patients: 5903 (80.1%) initiating warfarin and 1465 (19.9%) initiating rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily. Rivaroxaban 15 mg was associated with a significant 47% reduction in the risk of worsening kidney function versus warfarin (hazard ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.35–0.78). Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients with type 2 diabetes. Rivaroxaban 15 mg may be associated with a lower risk of worsening kidney function as compared with warfarin in the atrial fibrillation population with moderate-to-severe CKD. NCT03359876 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.To evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin.This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 – January 4, 2023.Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men or ≥ 3 in women).Among the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66–84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25–29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 0.88, p = 0.024) are more likely to be on warfarin than a DOAC. Patients taking more than five medications daily (6–10 medications: aOR 1.92, p = 0.013; ≥ 16: aOR = 2.10, p = 0.006) were more likely to be on an anticoagulant and may receive a DOAC over warfarin.AF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are factors associated with greater warfarin usage, while patients taking over five daily medications are more likely to be prescribed DOACs.Objective: The available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.To evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin.This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 – January 4, 2023.Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men or ≥ 3 in women).Among the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66–84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25–29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 0.88, p = 0.024) are more likely to be on warfarin than a DOAC. Patients taking more than five medications daily (6–10 medications: aOR 1.92, p = 0.013; ≥ 16: aOR = 2.10, p = 0.006) were more likely to be on an anticoagulant and may receive a DOAC over warfarin.AF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are factors associated with greater warfarin usage, while patients taking over five daily medications are more likely to be prescribed DOACs.Design and Participants: The available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.To evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin.This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 – January 4, 2023.Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men or ≥ 3 in women).Among the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66–84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25–29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 0.88, p = 0.024) are more likely to be on warfarin than a DOAC. Patients taking more than five medications daily (6–10 medications: aOR 1.92, p = 0.013; ≥ 16: aOR = 2.10, p = 0.006) were more likely to be on an anticoagulant and may receive a DOAC over warfarin.AF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are factors associated with greater warfarin usage, while patients taking over five daily medications are more likely to be prescribed DOACs.Main Measures: The available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.To evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin.This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 – January 4, 2023.Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men or ≥ 3 in women).Among the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66–84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25–29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 0.88, p = 0.024) are more likely to be on warfarin than a DOAC. Patients taking more than five medications daily (6–10 medications: aOR 1.92, p = 0.013; ≥ 16: aOR = 2.10, p = 0.006) were more likely to be on an anticoagulant and may receive a DOAC over warfarin.AF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are factors associated with greater warfarin usage, while patients taking over five daily medications are more likely to be prescribed DOACs.Key Results: The available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.To evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin.This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 – January 4, 2023.Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men or ≥ 3 in women).Among the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66–84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25–29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 0.88, p = 0.024) are more likely to be on warfarin than a DOAC. Patients taking more than five medications daily (6–10 medications: aOR 1.92, p = 0.013; ≥ 16: aOR = 2.10, p = 0.006) were more likely to be on an anticoagulant and may receive a DOAC over warfarin.AF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are factors associated with greater warfarin usage, while patients taking over five daily medications are more likely to be prescribed DOACs.Conclusions: The available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.To evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin.This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 – January 4, 2023.Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men or ≥ 3 in women).Among the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66–84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25–29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 0.88, p = 0.024) are more likely to be on warfarin than a DOAC. Patients taking more than five medications daily (6–10 medications: aOR 1.92, p = 0.013; ≥ 16: aOR = 2.10, p = 0.006) were more likely to be on an anticoagulant and may receive a DOAC over warfarin.AF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are factors associated with greater warfarin usage, while patients taking over five daily medications are more likely to be prescribed DOACs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies have shown that patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who discontinue oral anticoagulants (OACs) are at higher risk of complications such as stroke. Objective: This analysis compared the risk of non-persistence with OACs among patients with NVAF. Methods: Adult patients with NVAF who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were identified using 01JAN2013–30JUN2019 data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and four US commercial claims databases. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuation (no evidence of index OAC use for ≥ 60 days from the last days' supply) or switch to another OAC. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to illustrate time to non-persistence along with cumulative incidences of non-persistence. Baseline and time-varying covariates were evaluated, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate non-persistence risk. Results: In total, 363,823 patients receiving apixaban, 57,121 receiving dabigatran, 282,831 receiving rivaroxaban, and 317,337 receiving warfarin were included. Of these, 47–72% discontinued/switched OAC therapy within an average 9-month follow-up. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence than were dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.62), rivaroxaban (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.75–0.76), and warfarin (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.74–0.75). Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence than were warfarin (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19–1.22) and rivaroxaban (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.22–1.25), and rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence than was warfarin (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97–0.98). Clinical events (stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding [MB]) during follow-up were predictors of non-persistence (stroke HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.53–1.61; MB HR 2.96; 95% CI 2.92–3.00). Conclusion: In over one million patients with NVAF, our results suggest differences in anticoagulation treatment persistence across OAC agents, even after accounting for clinical events after OAC initiation. It is important for clinicians and patients to take these differences into consideration, especially as non-persistence to OAC therapy is associated with thromboembolic complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bleeding related to direct oral anticoagulants accounts for nearly half of emergency department visits annually and until recently there were no reversal antidotes available. As there continues to be a shift in prescribing practices away from warfarin, it is essential to have these reversal agents readily available for the treatment of life-threatening bleeds associated with these anticoagulants. In addition, for agents that continue to lack a targeted reversal agent (eg, low-molecular-weight heparin, antiplatelets, and new antithrombotics), it is imperative that research continues to evaluate improved reversal strategies. This review focuses on target-specific anticoagulation reversal agents currently available in the United States (protamine, idarucizumab, and andexanet alfa) and summarizes agents that are in the pipeline for these anticoagulants and antiplatelets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: In 2009, a large multicenter study demonstrated that the rate of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) across US children's hospitals had significantly increased from 2001 to 2007. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of pediatric VTE from 2008 to 2019 using similar methodology. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Subjects from birth to <18 years admitted from 2008 through 2019 who had an ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM code for VTE were included. Demographics, underling medical comorbidities and mortality were collected. VTE location and anticoagulation data during admission were extracted. RESULTS: During the 12-year study period, there were 52 401 hospital admissions among 39 713 pediatric patients with a diagnosis of VTE. The VTE admission rate increased from 46 VTE cases per 10 000 admissions in 2008 to 106 VTE cases per 10 000 admissions in 2019, a 130% increase (P < .0001) in VTE events. The median age at admission was 6.1 years, and almost one-third (31.3%) of patients with VTE were in the adolescent age group (13-17 years). Most patients (78%) had an underlying chronic medical condition. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VTE in hospitalized pediatric patients continues to increase from a 70% increase reported from 2001 to 2007 to the 130% increase from 2008 to 2019. These findings support the need for more effective VTE prevention strategies. Clinical trials focused on risk stratification and VTE prevention are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: By discussing the corresponding situation of PIM criteria and labels, it provides a reference for the formulation and update of the criteria and the content of the section of "medications for the elderly" in the labels, so as to realize rational drug use for the elderly. Methods: Extract the four indicators of Beers criteria, STOPP criteria, and the EU(7)-PIM list that involve dosage, duration, age, and mortality, and compare them with the latest labels for drugs marketed in the USA and the EU. Results: There are 148 drugs involving four indicators in the criteria, and 85.14% of the drugs are found in at least one region. In terms of dose, there are 28 drugs with inconsistent descriptions in the labels of the two regions, accounting for 47.46% of the 59 drugs found in both regions. A total of 42.37% of the drugs are consistent in both regions with the criteria (25/59), 28.81% of the drugs are inconsistent in both regions with the criteria (17/59), and 28.81% of the drugs are inconsistent in only one region with the criteria (17/59). The doses of 50 drugs found in F/D labels are consistent with the criteria, accounting for 54.35% of the 92 drugs found in F/D labels, and of 41 drugs found in E/H SmPC are consistent with the criteria, accounting for 60.29% of the 68 drugs found in E/H SmPC. Only the duration of omeprazole in the labels in both regions is consistent with the criteria, and only the age of prasugrel in both regions is consistent with the criteria. Five drugs whose labels mentioned increased mortality, accounting for 38.46% of the 13 drugs found in both regions. Conclusion: There are certain differences between PIM criteria and PIM criteria, labels and labels, and PIM criteria and labels, which will affect the use of drugs in the elderly. Therefore, the unity between the criteria and labels should be strengthened to provide more instructive guidance for the elderly, so as to jointly realize rational drug use in the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is a new syndrome that has been hypothesized to be connected with the COVID-19 pandemic. Children are presenting—likely after SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposure—with vague symptoms including fever, gastrointestinal distress, and/or rash. Objective: To review what is currently known about multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, including physiology, signs and symptoms, laboratory and imaging findings, treatment options, and nursing considerations in critical care settings. Methods: This integrative review was conducted using the keywords multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, Kawasaki-like syndrome, COVID, COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2. Initially, 324 articles were found. All were screened, and 34 were included. Eight articles were added after hand-searching and weekly literature searches were conducted. Data Synthesis: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is a newly identified syndrome, thus information on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes is available but evolving. Many aspects of nursing care are important to consider with regard to this illness, including COVID precautions, physical assessments, medication administration, and timing of blood sampling for laboratory testing as well as other standard intensive care unit considerations. Providing anticipatory guidance and support to patients and their families is also important. Conclusion: Critical care nurses must remain informed about advances in the care of patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, as these patients are often seen in critical care environments because of their high risk of cardiovascular failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data directly comparing trends in the use of different oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from different countries are limited. We addressed this using a large-scale network cohort study in the United States (US), Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK).Methods: We used nine databases (claims or electronic health records) that had been converted into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model with analysis performed using open-source analytical tools. We identified adults with AF and a first OAC prescription, either vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), from 2010 to 2017. We described time trends in use, continuation, and switching.Results: In 2010, 87.5%-99.8% of patients started on a VKA. By 2017, the majority started on a DOAC: 87.0% (US), 88.3% (Belgium), 93.1% (France), 88.4% (Germany), and 86.1%-86.7% (UK). In the UK, DOACs became the most common starting OAC in 2015, 2-3 years later than elsewhere. Apixaban was the most common starting OAC by 2017, 50.2%-57.8% (US), 31.4% (Belgium), 45.9% (France), 39.5% (Germany), and 49.8%-50.5% (UK), followed by rivaroxaban, 24.8%-32.5% (US), 25.7% (Belgium), 38.4% (France), 24.9% (Germany), and 30.2%-31.2% (UK). Long-term treatment was less common in the US than in Europe, especially the UK. A minority of patients switched from their index OAC in the short and long term.Conclusions: From 2010 to 2017, VKA use had significantly declined and DOAC use had significantly increased in the US and Europe. Apixaban was the most prescribed OAC in 2017, followed by rivaroxaban. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Apixaban and rivaroxaban are replacing vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults; however, head-to-head comparisons remain limited.Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban in patients with VTE.Design: Retrospective new-user cohort study.Setting: U.S.-based commercial health care insurance database from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2020.Participants: Adults with VTE who were newly prescribed apixaban or rivaroxaban.Measurements: The primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE, a composite of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding.Results: Of 49 900 eligible patients with VTE, 18 618 were new users of apixaban and 18 618 were new users of rivaroxaban. Median follow-up was 102 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 30, 128 days) among apixaban and 105 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 30, 140 days) among rivaroxaban users. After propensity score matching, apixaban (vs. rivaroxaban) was associated with a lower rate for recurrent VTE (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.87]) and bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.60 [CI, 0.53 to 0.69]). The absolute reduction in the probability of recurrent VTE with apixaban versus rivaroxaban was 0.006 (CI, 0.005 to 0.011) within 2 months and 0.011 (CI, 0.011 to 0.013) within 6 months of initiation. The absolute reduction in the probability of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding with apixaban versus rivaroxaban was 0.011 (CI, 0.010 to 0.011) within 2 months and 0.015 (CI, 0.013 to 0.015) within 6 months of initiation.Limitation: Short follow-up.Conclusion: In this population-based cohort study, patients with VTE who were new users of apixaban had lower rates for recurrent VTE and bleeding than new users of rivaroxaban.Primary Funding Source: None. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies have reported COVID-19 as an independent risk factor for arterial thromboemboli. Methods: From a cross-sectional sample, we determined the incidence and location of arterial thromboemboli (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, peripheral artery), stratified by COVID-19 status, in the RECOVER database, which included data on patients at 45 United States medical centers in 22 states. Epidemiological factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected through a combination of individual chart review and automatic electronic query and recorded in REDCap®. We investigated the association of baseline comorbidities on the development of arterial thromboemboli and analyzed results based on the presence or absence of concomitant COVID-19 infection, testing this association with Chi-squared. We also described use of anticoagulants and statins. Results: Data were collected on 26,974 patients, of which 13,803 (51.17%) tested positive for COVID-19. Incidence of arterial thromboemboli during hospitalization was 0.13% in patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and 0.19% in patients who tested negative. Arterial thromboemboli tended to be more common in extremities than in core organs (heart, kidney, lung, liver) in patients with COVID-19, odds ratio 2.04 (95% CI 0.707 – 5.85). Patients with COVID-19 were less likely to develop an arterial thrombus when on baseline statin medication (p=0.014). Presence of metabolic syndrome predicted presence of core arterial thrombus (p=0.001) and extremity arterial thrombus (p=0.010) in those with COVID-19. Arterial thromboemboli were less common in patients with COVID-19 than in those who tested negative for COVID-19. Conclusions: Presence of a composite metabolic syndrome profile may be associated with arterial clot formation in patients with COVID-19 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is Known and Objective: Anticoagulants are indicated for treatment and prevention of several clinical conditions. Prior studies have examined anticoagulant utilization for specific indications and in community‐dwelling populations. Decision‐making regarding anticoagulant prescribing in the nursing home setting is particularly challenging because advanced age and clinical complexity places most residents at increased risk for adverse drug events. To estimate the prevalence of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use (overall, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) and identify factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among the general population of residents living in nursing homes. Methods: This point prevalence study was conducted among 506,482 residents in US nursing homes on 31 October 2016 who were enrolled in Medicare fee‐for‐service. Covariates including demographics, clinical conditions, medications, cognitive impairment and functional status were obtained from Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments and Medicare Part A and D claims. Oral anticoagulant use was identified using dispensing dates and days supply information from Medicare Part D claims. Robust Poisson models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for associations between covariates and 1) any anticoagulant use, and 2) DOAC versus warfarin use. Results and Discussion: Overall, 11.8% of residents used oral anticoagulants. Among users, 44.3% used DOACs. Residents with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 (aPR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.61 −1.71), with functional dependency in activities of daily living, polypharmacy and higher CHA2DS2‐VASc risk ischaemic stroke scores, had a higher prevalence of oral anticoagulant use. Women (aPR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76–0.79), residents with limited life expectancy (aPR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76–0.83), those with moderate‐to‐severe cognitive impairment (aPR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.65–0.68), those using NSAIDs or antiplatelets, and non‐white racial/ethnic groups had a lower prevalence of anticoagulant use. Residents with higher levels of polypharmacy, BMI and age had a lower prevalence of DOAC use (versus warfarin). What is New and Conclusion: Approximately one in eight general nursing home residents use oral anticoagulants and among oral anticoagulant users, only slightly more residents used warfarin than DOACs. The lower prevalence of anticoagulation among women and non‐white racial/ethnic groups raises concerns of potential inequities in quality of care. Lower oral anticoagulant use among residents with limited life expectancy suggests possible deprescribing at the end of life. Further research is needed to inform resident‐centred shared decision‐making that explicitly considers treatment goals and individual‐specific risks and benefits of anticoagulation at all stages of the medication use continuum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy is well known for its primary and secondary prevention of sequela from cardiovascular disease by decreasing the incidence of acute cerebral, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and other thrombo-embolicevents. The overwhelming data show that the risk of thrombotic events is significantly higher than that of bleeding during surgery after antiplatelet drug discontinuation. It has been assumed that discontinuing antiplatelet therapy prior to performing interventional pain management techniques is a common practice, even though doing so may potentially increase the risk of acute cerebral and cardiovascular events. A survey of practice patterns was conducted in 2012, since then the risks associated with thromboembolic events and bleeding, has not been systematically evaluated., Objective: To conduct an updated assessment of the perioperative antiplatelet and anticoagulant practice patterns of U.S. interventional pain management physicians and compare this with data collected in 2012 with 2021 data regarding practice patterns of continuing or discontinuing anticoagulant therapy. STUDY DESIGNn: Postal survey of interventional pain management physicians., Study Setting: Interventional pain management practices in the United States., Methods: The survey was conducted based on online responses of the members of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) in 2021. The survey was designed similar to the 2012 survey to assess updated practice patterns., Results: The questionnaire was sent out to 1,700 members in October 2021. Out of these, 185 members completed the survey, while 105 were returned due to invalid addresses. The results showed that 23% changed their practice patterns during the previous year. The results also showed that all physicians discontinued warfarin therapy with the majority of physicians accepting an INR of 1.5 as a safe level. Low dose aspirin (81 mg) was discontinued for 3 to 7 days for low-risk procedures by 8% of the physicians, 34% of the physicians for moderate or intermediate risk procedures, whereas they were discontinued by 76% of the physicians for high-risk procedures. High dose aspirin (325 mg) was discontinued at a higher rate. Antiplatelet agents, including dipyridamole, cilostazol, and Aggrenox (aspirin, extended-release dipyridamole) were discontinued from 3 to 5 days by 18%-23% of the physicians for low-risk procedures, approximately 60% of the physicians for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and over 90% of the physicians for high-risk procedures. Platelet aggregation inhibitors clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, and ticagrelor were discontinued for 3 to 5 days by approximately 26% to 41% for low-risk procedures, almost 90% for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and over 97% for high-risk procedures. Thrombin inhibitor dabigatran was discontinued by 33% of the physicians for low-risk procedures, 92% for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and 99% for high-risk procedures. Anti-Xa agents, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban were discontinued in over 25% of the physicians for low-risk procedures, approximately 90% for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and 99% for high-risk procedures., Limitations: This study was limited by its being an online survey of the membership of one organization in one country, that there was only a 11.6% response rate, and the sample size is relatively small. Underreporting in surveys is common. Further, the incidence of thromboembolic events or epidural hematomas was not assessed., Conclusion: The results in the 2021 survey illustrate a continued pattern of discontinuing antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in the perioperative period. The majority of discontinuation patterns appear to fall within guidelines.