Search

Simple Summary: In the treatment of colorectal cancer, classic chemotherapy drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, trifluridine, and tipiracil have played a crucial role. Through the analysis of the top 100 most influential articles, we examined the evolution in research and current relevance, confirming the continued significance of this group of drugs despite the emergence of new treatments. The research reveals global collaboration among institutions, countries (primarily the United States, China, and Europe), and researchers, with three main themes driving the study: pharmacogenetics, new pharmaceutical formulations, and the use of adjuvants. In the landscape of colorectal cancer treatment, classical chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, trifluridine, and tipiracil have historically played a pivotal role. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most influential articles focusing on these classic chemotherapy drugs in the management of colorectal cancer. With this, we shed light on their current importance, despite the emergence of new therapeutic targets and treatments in the field of oncology. Systematically evaluating research outputs, this analysis reveals a prevalence of co-authorship among institutions, countries (led by the United States, China, and Europe), and researchers highlighting the global and collaborative nature of efforts in research, utilization, and development of these drugs. Three thematic axes lead the research: pharmacogenetics, the development of new pharmaceutical forms, and the use of adjuvants. This research serves as a foundation for future endeavors, aiding researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in making informed decisions about the direction of research and development in the dynamic field of colorectal cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Globally, breast cancer persists a main cause of mortality. Because the number of possible drug combinations is basically unlimited, a strategy for the design of combination chemotherapy regimen of two anti-breast cancer drugs and determining the most promising combinations is crucial for improving the therapeutic outcomes and overcome the multitherapeutic approach and holds the promise of delivering therapy to those in need. Aim: To assess the activity of combination of Doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil on Human Breast Cancer Cell line (MCF-7). Materials and Methods: The cytotoxicity of Doxorubicin (DOX) and 5 fluorouracil (5FU) drugs or their combinations were evaluated by using 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5 Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) viability assay against human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Then, the combination effect proposed by Chou TC et al., based on IC50 values obtained from drugs alone and their combination was evaluated by Combination Index (CI) to determine the nature of synergism, antagonism and additivity action of drug combinations as: synergistic effect is recorded if CI <1, additive effect if CI=1, or antagonism if CI >1, the median-effect dose (Dm) also studied. Dose-Reduction Index (DRI) was also calculated to indicate the level of dose reduction for each drug in synergistic combination. Experiments were achieved with triplicate samples. The MTT assay data were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). The IC50 values for each drug were computed by GraphPad Prism 5.2 software (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). Dose-effect curve parameters, CI values, Fa-CI, DRI-Faplot were calculated by CompuSyn program. Results: The proliferation of MCF-7 cells was inhibited by 5 FU and DOX anti-cancer drugs in a dose-dependent effect. The DOX at (0.1) nM was antagonistic according to CI value which was 2.82283, while at (1) nM, the CI was 0.39429 that indicate strong synergistic action. Conclusion: This study confirmed the favourable effect of 5 FU in combination with DOX for treatment of breast cancer cell MCF-7 better than the single drug treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic cancer is the thirdmost common cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Surgical resection with negative margins still constitutes the cornerstone of potentially curative therapy, but is possible only in 15-20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that the neoadjuvant approach may improve R0 resection rate in localized resectable and borderline resectable diseases, and potentially downstage locally advanced disease to achieve surgical resection, though the impact on survival is to be determined. Despite advancements in the last decade in developing effective combinational chemo-radio therapeutic options, preoperative treatment strategies, and better peri-operative care, pancreatic cancer continues to carry a dismal prognosis in the majority. Prodigious efforts are currently being made in optimizing the neoadjuvant therapy with a better toxicity profile, developing novel agents, imaging techniques, and identification of biomarkers for the disease. Advancement in our understanding of the tumor microenvironment and molecular pathology is urgently needed to facilitate the development of novel targeted and immunotherapies for this setting. In this review, we detail the current literature on contemporary management of resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer with a focus on future directions in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Tegafur is a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug widely used outside the United States to treat colorectal cancer as well as cancers of the head and neck. The resulting plasma concentrations of tegafur are much higher than those of 5-FU; thus, analytical methods are needed that are sensitive enough to detect low plasma concentrations of 5-FU and robust enough to simultaneously analyze tegafur. Previous LC–MS/MS methods have either failed to demonstrate the ability to simultaneously measure low 5-FU and high tegafur plasma levels, or failed to be applicable in clinical studies. Our goal was to develop a method capable of measuring low concentrations of 5-FU (8–200ng/ml) and high concentrations of tegafur (800–20,000ng/ml) in human plasma and to subsequently evaluate the utility of the method in patient samples collected during a phase I clinical study where oral doses of either 200mg or 300mg UFT®/LV (uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio plus leucovorin) were administered. A combined LC–MS/MS and LC–UV method was developed utilizing negative ion atmospheric pressure ionization (API). The method provides an accuracy and precision of <10% and <6%, respectively, for both analytes. Material recoveries from the liquid–liquid extraction technique were 97–110% and 86–91% for tegafur and 5-FU, respectively. Utilization of this method to determine tegafur and 5-FU plasma concentrations followed by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses successfully estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (C MAX, t MAX and AUC0–10h) in the clinical study patients. Overall, this method is ideal for the simultaneous bioanalysis of low levels of 5-FU and relatively higher levels of its prodrug, tegafur, in human plasma for clinical pharmacokinetic analysis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapies is rapidly becoming the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Panitumumab (formerly ABX-EGF) is a fully human antibody developed to target the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1), which is expressed in up to 75% of patients with colorectal cancer. As a fully human antibody, panitumumab can be administered without any premedication and few infusion reactions have been reported. It has recently been approved in the USA for the treatment of colorectal cancer as a single agent in the salvage setting. Ongoing studies are being performed to determine whether the addition of panitumumab to standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer will improve the survival of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Fluoropyrimidines (FPDs) are a fundamental component of many chemotherapy regimens. Cardiotoxic adverse events (AEs) such as angina, ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine (CAPE) have been sparingly described in studies, primarily through case reports. Data from the 1990s revealed an estimated incidence of 0.5% to 19%, with cardiovascular fatalities occurring in ≤28%. The current use of FPDs includes multiple dosing regimens, oral or intravenous delivery, and administration with additional cardiotoxic therapies. As such, it is imperative to better define the cardiotoxicity risk in the modern treatment era. We comprehensively evaluated the incidence, prevalence, and ascertainment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease within ECOG-ACRIN (Eastern Cooperative Group Cancer Research Group - American College of Radiology Imaging Network) Cancer Research Group clinical trials incorporating 5-FU and CAPE., Materials and Methods: Case report forms and clinical study reports from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group database of phase II and III clinical trials incorporating 5-FU and CAPE were evaluated. A total of 16 trials from 2002 to 2017 were identified that had used bolus 5-FU (n = 1), continuous infusion 5-FU (n = 10) or CAPE (n = 5)., Results: A history of cardiovascular disease was variably defined and was an exclusion criterion in 13 of the 16 studies (81%). The baseline risk factors and history of cardiac disease were specifically collected in only 3 studies (19%). All studies collected cardiovascular AEs using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version available at the time of the study. Fewer than half (7 of 16; 44%) of the study case report forms had also specifically requested information on cardiac ischemia/infarction. In the 12 completed studies with clinical study reports, the following AEs were reported: dyspnea, ≤16%; arrhythmias, ≤6%; and angina, ischemia, and elevated troponin, ≤5%. Some trials only recorded cardiac AEs that were possibly associated with the novel drug being studied and not those attributed to the standard of care in the 5-FU/CAPE arm, further decreasing the numerical incidence., Conclusion: Inconsistent clinical trial reporting of cardiac AEs precluded accurate and precise delineation of the epidemiology of FPD-related cardiovascular AEs. Prospective knowledge of the definition and natural history will lead to the development of risk factor stratification and prechemotherapy interventions to reduce or prevent cardiotoxicity. We propose that the prospective collection of baseline cardiac data and prespecified cardiac endpoints are necessary to fully understand the incidence and cardiac risk of FDPs., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The safety profiles of oral fluoropyrimidines were compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) using adverse event reports (AERs) submitted to the Adverse Event Reporting System, AERS, of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)., Methods: After a revision of arbitrary drug names and the deletion of duplicated submissions, AERs involving 5-FU and oral fluoropyrimidines were analyzed. Standardized official pharmacovigilance tools were used for the quantitative detection of signals, i.e., drug-associated adverse events, including the proportional reporting ratio, the reporting odds ratio, the information component given by a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the empirical Bayes geometric mean., Results: Based on 22,017,956 co-occurrences, i.e., drug-adverse event pairs, found in 1,644,220 AERs from 2004 to 2009, it was suggested that leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were more frequently accompanied by the use of 5-FU than capecitabine, whereas diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and hand-foot syndrome were more frequently associated with capecitabine. The total number of co-occurrences was not large enough to compare tegafur, tegafur-uracil (UFT), tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (S-1), or doxifluridine to 5-FU., Conclusion: The results obtained herein were consistent with clinical observations, suggesting the usefulness of the FDA's AERS database and data mining methods used, but the number of co-occurrences is an important factor in signal detection.