Search

Background: The primary aim was to test the hypothesis that deriving pre-treatment 3D magnetic resonance tumour volume (mrTV) quantification improves performance characteristics for the prediction of loco-regional failure compared with standard maximal tumour diameter (1D) assessment in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Methods: We performed an early evaluation case-control study at two UK centres (2007-2014) in 39 patients with loco-regional failure (cases), and 41 patients disease-free at 3 years (controls). mrTV was determined using the summation of areas method (Volsum). Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass concordance correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreements. We derived receiver operating curves using logistic regression models and expressed accuracy as area under the curve (ROCAUC).Results: The median time per patient for Volsum quantification was 7.00 (inter-quartile range, IQR: 0.57-12.48) minutes. Intra and inter-observer reproducibilities were generally good (ICCs from 0.79 to 0.89) but with wide limits of agreement (intra-observer: - 28 to 31%; inter-observer: - 28 to 46%). Median mrTVs were greater for cases (32.6 IQR: 21.5-53.1 cm3) than controls (9.9 IQR: 5.7-18.1 cm3, p < 0.0001). The ROCAUC for mrT-size predicting loco-regional failure was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85) improving to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.92) when replaced with mrTV (test for ROC differences, p = 0.024).Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest that the replacement of mrTV for mrT-size improves prediction of loco-regional failure after chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. However, mrTV calculation is time consuming and variation in its reproducibility are drawbacks with the current technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Comorbidities have been shown to impact the presentation and treatment of patients with cancers. This study investigates the prevalence and patterns of comorbidity in a pan-cancer cohort of patients treated at a large UK specialist cancer center over a 9-year period., Methods: A retrospective review of 77,149 patients from 01/01/2014 to 15/12/2022 was conducted using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score (ACE-27) to assess the burden of comorbidities across 12 organ systems and an overall comorbidity burden. Binary and multinomial logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate the relationships between comorbidity incidence and demographic and socio-economic factors., Results: At the time of diagnosis, 59.7% of patients had at least one comorbidity, with the highest prevalence in lung cancer and the lowest in brain/CNS and endocrine gland cancers. Cardiovascular comorbidities were the most frequent. Comorbidity severity was higher in patients from more deprived areas. Age and performance status were associated with a higher incidence of all comorbidities examined. Patients with advanced stage had a lower risk of having a severe comorbidity burden., Conclusion: Comorbidities are common across all cancers but are more prevalent in certain patient populations. Further research to understand the implications of comorbidities in cancer management is needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become the standard of care for suitable patients with peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Lung SABR requires strict image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) protocols to ensure its safe delivery. The aim of this survey was to provide an assessment of current lung SABR practice in the UK., Methods: An online semi-structured survey containing a maximum of 32 questions regarding lung SABR, focussing on treatment image verification processes was piloted, developed and disseminated to the radiotherapy managers of 62 National Health Service centres across the UK., Results: The survey had a 100% complete response from NHS centres. 36 centres (58%) currently deliver lung SABR, with half treating fewer than 50 patients per year. Six centres deliver SABR despite not being commissioned by the NHS to provide this service. There is wide variation in the use of IGRT. Eight different permutations of cone beam CT order within the workflow were reported. Almost half of lung centres (17/36, 47%) believe there is a need to update national image guidance associated with lung SABR, such as the use of 'day zero', mid treatment and post treatment cone beam CTs., Conclusion: Our results demonstrate wide variation in IGRT for lung SABR. There is an opportunity to develop existing IGRT workflows and the optimal approach to image guidance. Further work is required to investigate lung SABR provision and potential barriers to its implementation., Advances in Knowledge: This survey represents the most comprehensive and accurate assessment of lung SABR practice in the UK since the 2014 SABR consortium survey.