Search

The 1998 Adult Dental Health Survey, published this year, showed that the number of people without teeth should fall over the next three decades, to only 4% of the UK population. Patterns of tooth loss and retention are also changing. This article, the first of a series on the interpretation of the Adult Dental Health Survey, discusses the implications of these trends for dentistry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data from the Adult Dental Survey conducted in 2009/10 have recorded some major changes in the pattern of oral conditions in British adults. The change in the number of sound and untreated teeth in recent decades has been particularly marked in younger adults. Across all ages there were 17.9 sound and untreated teeth per dentate adult, but among the youngest (16-24-year-olds) it was 26.9 teeth indicating rapidly improving prospects for young adults compared with their predecessors. Between 1998 and 2009 the overall prevalence of caries of all types in England has fallen dramatically from 54% to 31% overall, but the number of teeth affected by caries among those people affected by decay is almost unchanged at around 2.7 affected teeth per person. Caries, and the reduction in caries, affected people of all ages. The rate of new restorations is correspondingly low and young adults in particular had fewer restorations than their predecessors. Much activity is now likely to be around repairing or extending existing restorations. By contrast 37% of dentate adults had crowns, up from 34% in 1998, averaging around three crowns per person among those who have crowns. A minority of British adults had a very healthy periodontal status (17%) and moderate periodontal disease (pockets of 4 mm to less than 6 mm) has also reduced markedly in the last decade, in line with measurably less plaque and more frequent brushing. However, more severe disease has increased slightly (from 6% to 9% of adults). The frequency of impact of poor oral health on people's lives has also reduced in the last decade. However, while clinical conditions are improving, there is a proportion of dentate adults that experience negative effects on their daily life frequently (16%) and/or severely (17%) due to their oral health; who are more likely to be those in a lower socioeconomic position and those with worse clinical status in terms of caries and periodontal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 2003 Children's Dental Health Survey is the fourth in a series of decennial national children's dental health surveys in the United Kingdom. Aims: This paper reports on the orthodontic condition of children aged 12 and 15 years. Methodology: A representative sample of children across the UK were invited to participate in a clinical dental examination in school. Two thousand, five hundred and ninety-five 12-year-olds and 2,142 15-year-olds were examined. Current and past orthodontic treatment and type of appliance worn were recorded. Orthodontic treatment need was assessed by the Modified IOTN in those not undergoing treatment. A postal questionnaire sought parents' views on the orthodontic condition of their children and perceived need for treatment. Results: At age 12, 35% were judged to have an orthodontic treatment need, 57% had no need and 8% were wearing an appliance. The corresponding figures at age 15 were, 21% (need), 65% (no need) and 14% (wearing appliance). A higher proportion of girls (p < 0.05) were wearing an appliance than boys. A greater proportion of 15-year-olds were undergoing treatment than in the 1993 and 1983 surveys and the use of fixed appliances had increased. Conclusions: In this representative sample of UK children, one in five were still judged as having an orthodontic treatment need at age 15 years, as determined by the modified index of orthodontic treatment need. However, considerable variation was observed between professional and lay perceptions of need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The 2003 Children's Dental Health Survey is the fourth of the 10-yearly surveys of children's oral health in the United Kingdom.Aim To detail the reported experience of dental services and dental treatment amongst children in the UK.Method A self-completion questionnaire was distributed to a 50% sub-sample of parents or carers of the children who were clinically examined in the 2003 UK Child Dental Health Survey. This included questions relating to parental and child experience of dental services and dental treatment.Results The proportion of UK five-year-olds reported as not having visited the dentist fell from 14% in 1983 to 6% in 2003 and the proportion reported as having visited the dentist before the age of two rose from 7% in 1983 to 31% in 2003. Over 80% of all children were reported to seek regular dental check-ups. Around 10% were reported to have had some difficulty in accessing NHS dental care while 5% of five-year-olds were reported to have experienced a general anaesthetic for dental procedures in 2003. Dental attendance was associated with social class and mothers' reported attendance patterns.Conclusions In line with previously reported trends, the 2003 survey of children in the United Kingdom shows improvements in several areas but some aspects of attendance pattern continue to be associated with social class and mothers' attendance pattern. It is of concern that 10% of five-year-olds reported having experienced extractions and 5% general anaesthesia for dental treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 2003 Children's Dental Health Survey is the fourth of the 10-yearly surveys of children's oral health. Aim: To report the prevalence of three non-carious tooth conditions in children in the UK. Method: A representative sample of children five, eight, 12 and 15 years of age were examined by calibrated examiners in schools across the UK. The dental examination included accidental damage to incisors, tooth surface loss (TSL) and enamel opacities (age 12 only). A postal questionnaire sought parental and child views on marks on teeth which could not be removed by brushing. Results: The proportion of children sustaining accidental damage to permanent incisors decreased to 11% of 12 and 13% of 15-year-olds, but the majority of accidental damage remained untreated. TSL was found on 53% of five-year-olds and on approximately a third of 12 and 15-year-olds. There was a statistically significant change for TSL on permanent teeth at age 15 where 27% upper incisors had TSL palatally in 1993 compared to 33% in 2003. Thirty-four per cent of 12-year-old children had enamel opacities on one or more of their teeth compared with 36% in 1993. Conclusions: Tooth surface loss remains a common finding in children in the UK. A large proportion of accidental damage to teeth remains untreated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The 2003 Children's Dental Health Survey is the fourth in a series of decennial national children's dental health surveys. Aims This paper reports the survey-derived estimates of dentinal caries experience of children aged five, eight, 12 and 15 years, considering the trends over recent decades and the position in 2003 following changes in disease presentation and the use of additional criteria. Methodology A representative UK sample of children in the four specified age groups were invited to participate in a clinical dental examination in school. A total of 12,698 children were sampled and 10,381 were examined (82%). Examinations were undertaken in school by trained and calibrated examining teams using reclining chairs and portable lights, the criteria were visual, limited to dentine caries and no diagnostic aids were employed. In order to compare trend data with 1993 and earlier surveys the criteria allowed the reclassification of the full 2003a results (those including cavities and visual dentine caries - D3cvMFT/d3cvmft) according to the previous criteria to produce results labelled 2003b (those restricted to dentinal cavities - D3cMFT/d3cmft). Results and conclusions The experience of obvious dentinal caries in children within the UK has continued to change over the last decade and patterns are different for the two dentitions. While continuing overall improvements are evident for permanent teeth across the UK (D3c for 15-year-old children falling from 42% in 1983, via 30% in 1993 to 13% in 2003 for example), trends amongst those experiencing dentinal caries are more concerning and there have been no statistically significant improvements for primary teeth (the mean number of teeth with obvious dentine decay (d3c) at age five years being 1.3 in 1983 and 1.4 in both 1993 and 2003). The inclusion in the criteria of visual dentinal caries resulted in higher estimates of mean caries and mean caries experience in the permanent dentition (at age 15 years D3 increasing from 0.2 to 0.8, D3MFT increasing from 1.6 to 2.0 for example) but not the primary dentition (where the estimates for % d3mft at age five years were identical at 43%). Geographic variations also persist across the UK (% with D3cvMFT at 12 years being 41% for England, 54% Wales, 73% Northern Ireland and 43% for the UK; % with d3cvmft at age 5 years: 41% for England, 52% Wales, 61% Northern Ireland and 43% for the UK). These survey results have implications for planning and for daily practice, but must be interpreted carefully acknowledging the specific survey conditions and diagnostic criteria employed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this paper are to provide an impartial overview of the proposals and agenda for the future brought together in the NHS Dentistry: Options for Change document in the context of previous dental service delivery in primary care, and to start to explore what Options for Change could mean for the future of NHS dental services. Options has been described as perhaps the most radical and ground breaking opportunity for NHS dentistry to finally move forward after prolonged periods of stagnation and disharmony. The Options agenda has the potential to bring in a new style of NHS practice for dentistry, providing a way to finally get off the current 'treadmill' and to develop new NHS dental services where prevention is a priority and providing high quality dental treatment, tailored to the long term needs of the 21st century patient, is the driving aim. However, the difficulties on all sides of leaving behind decades of disputes and overcoming real access, workforce and funding issues must not be underestimated or dismissed. The report was prepared by a working group comprising representatives from the profession, of patient groups and various sections of the Department of Health in England which was brought together by the then Chief Dental Officer. The key themes and priorities for action identified in Options include: local commissioning and funding, methods of remuneration for general dental practitioners, prevention and an oral health assessment for patients, clinical pathways, information and communication technology, practice structure, development of the dental team and the patient experience. The document also contains comprehensive reports of the three Options for Change task groups making recommendations for: 1) a new deal for patients - national standards, 2) systems of delivery of dental care and 3) education, training and development of the dental team. Ways forward for delivering improved, modern, effective, preventive, patient-centred dental care have been identified. This potential can, however, only be realised if viable and sustainable agreements can be achieved to operationalise the best choices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The virtual Centre for Improving Oral Health (vC-IOH) through Evidence-Based Dentistry has been established by a unique non-competitive networking of four Great Britain units that have a long history in the advocacy and use of evidence-based methods. The mission of the vC-IOH is to, identify and objectively synthesis, quality-assured best evidence on dental interventions, ensure that this information is made readily accessible via a variety of formats and exploiting the potential of electronic knowledge services. The Centre will also link with the new Oral Health Unit of the English National Primary Care Research and Development Centre. These links will be co-ordinated by a specially-created Great Britain National Health Service Dental Knowledge Delivery Team chaired by the Chief Dental Officer for England.

Background: The recent World Health Organization (WHO) resolution on oral health urges pivoting to a preventive approach and integration of oral health into the non-communicable diseases agenda. This study aimed to: 1) explore the healthcare costs of managing dental caries between the ages of 12 and 65 years across socioeconomic groups in six countries (Brazil, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, UK), and 2) estimate the potential reduction in direct costs from non-targeted and targeted oral health-promoting interventions., Methods: A cohort simulation model was developed to estimate the direct costs of dental caries over time for different socioeconomic groups. National-level DMFT (dentine threshold) data, the relative likelihood of receiving an intervention (such as a restorative procedure, tooth extraction and replacement), and clinically-guided assumptions were used to populate the model. A hypothetical group of upstream and downstream preventive interventions were applied either uniformly across all deprivation groups to reduce caries progression rates by 30% or in a levelled-up fashion with the greatest gains seen in the most deprived group., Results: The population level direct costs of caries from 12 to 65 years of age varied between US10.2 billion in Italy to US$36.2 billion in Brazil. The highest per-person costs were in the UK at US$22,910 and the lowest in Indonesia at US$7,414. The per-person direct costs were highest in the most deprived group across Brazil, France, Italy and the UK. With the uniform application of preventive measures across all deprivation groups, the greatest reduction in per-person costs for caries management was seen in the most deprived group across all countries except Indonesia. With a levelling-up approach, cost reductions in the most deprived group ranged from US$3,948 in Indonesia to US$17,728 in the UK., Conclusion: Our exploratory analysis shows the disproportionate economic burden of caries in the most deprived groups and highlights the significant opportunity to reduce direct costs via levelling-up preventive measures. The healthcare burden stems from a higher baseline caries experience and greater annual progression rates in the most deprived. Therefore, preventive measures should be start early, with a focus on lowering early childhood caries and continue through the life course., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This article aims to outline the early development of a King's College London dental spinout company, Reminova, formed to commercialize a novel clinical method of caries remineralization: electrically accelerated and enhanced remineralization (EAER). This method is being developed to address the unmet clinical need identified by modern caries management strategies to keep enamel "whole" through remineralization of clinical caries as a form of nonoperative caries treatment for initial-stage and moderate lesions. A progressive movement within dentistry is shifting away from the restorative-only model, which, it is suggested, has failed. The high prevalence of initial-stage caries across populations provides a significant opportunity to prevent restorations and reduce repeat restorations over a patient's lifetime. Reminova has set out to provide a method to repair lesions without drilling, filling, pain, or injections. The article outlines the rationale for and the chronological stages of the technology and company development. It then outlines corroborative evidence to show that EAER treatment can, in this preliminary in vitro investigation, remineralize clinically significant caries throughout the depth of the lesion as measured by Knoop microhardness and corroborated by scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, the presented data show that EAER-treated enamel is harder than the healthy enamel measured nearby in each sample and is very similar in appearance to healthy enamel from the subjective interpretation made possible by scanning electron microscopy imagery. The data presented also show that this more "complete" remineralization to a high hardness level has been achieved with 2 remineralizing agents via in vitro human tooth samples. The broad clinical potential of this new treatment methodology seems to be very encouraging from these results. Reminova will strive to continue its mission, to ensure that, in the future, dental teams will not need to drill holes for the treatment of initial-stage and moderate caries lesions.

The fissure-sealing of newly erupted molars is an effective caries prevention treatment, but remains underutilized. Two plausible reasons are the financial disincentive produced by the dental remuneration system, and dentists' lack of awareness of evidence-based practice. The primary hypothesis was that implementation strategies based on remuneration or training in evidence-based healthcare would produce a higher proportion of children receiving sealed second permanent molars than standard care. The four study arms were: fee per sealant treatment, education in evidence-based practice, fee plus education, and control. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. Analysis was based on 133 dentists and 2833 children. After adjustment for baseline differences, the primary outcome was 9.8% higher when a fee was offered. The education intervention had no statistically significant effect. 'Fee only' was the most cost-effective intervention. The study contributes to the incentives in health care provision debate, and led to the introduction of a direct fee for this treatment.

Objective: This paper reports the results of standardized clinical caries examinations of 5-year-old children from across England, Wales and Scotland in 2005/6. These co-ordinated surveys are the latest in a series which seek to monitor the dental health of children and to assess the delivery of dental services., Method: The criteria and conventions of the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry were used. Representative samples were drawn from participating strategic health authorities (SHAs), primary care trusts (PCTs) and health boards (HBs). Caries was diagnosed at the caries into dentine threshold using a visual method without radiography or fibre-optic transillumination., Results: 239,389 five and six year-old children from across England, Wales, Scotland and the Isle of Man were examined in 2005/2006. The results again demonstrated a wide variation in disease prevalence and care strategies across Great Britain. Mean d3mft across England was 1.47 (d3t = 1.10, mt = 0.20, ft = 0.16), across Wales the corresponding values were 2.38 (d3t = 1.70, mt = 0.43, ft = 0.25) and in Scotland 2.16 (d3t = 1.45, mt = 0.51, ft = 0.20). Overall, 39.4% of children in Great Britain had evidence of caries experience in dentine (d3mft > 0, including visual dentine caries). The distribution of caries was highly skewed. Thus the mean caries experience for those with dentinal decay was 3.99, as opposed to the overall mean of 1.57. Trends over time demonstrate a small change in mean d3mft since 2003/4 when the mean was 1.62, although the mean value for those with dentine decay experience remained constant (4.00 vs 3.99). The care index has also fallen marginally from 12% to 11%. The BASCD co-ordinated NHS Epidemiology Programme will evolve in coming years as differing priorities in the frequency of inspecting particular age groups is being seen as well as a desire to measure other aspects of oral health in addition., Conclusion: Overall, there has been only a small overall improvement in the dental health of 5-year-old children over the last 2 years and no diminution of the level of disease in those affected for some time, although in Scotland a pattern of continuing steady progress from previously high levels is seen. While many children enjoy good oral health, sizable groups remain within the population of 5-year-old children who have a clinically significant burden of preventable dental disease.