1. A Moral Intervention Reduces Doping Likelihood in British and Greek Athletes: Evidence From a Cluster Randomized Control Trial.
- Author
-
Kavussanu, Maria, Hurst, Philip, Yukhymenko-Lescroart, Mariya, Galanis, Evangelos, King, Ailish, Hatzigeorgiadis, Antonis, and Ring, Christopher
- Subjects
- *
CLUSTER randomized controlled trials , *PSYCHOLOGICAL disengagement , *LOW-income countries , *MIDDLE-income countries , *PREVENTION of doping in sports , *DOPING in sports , *PSYCHOLOGY of athletes , *RESEARCH , *ETHICS , *RESEARCH methodology , *GUILT (Psychology) , *ATHLETES , *MEDICAL cooperation , *EVALUATION research , *COMPARATIVE studies , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Objectives: The authors aimed to develop a moral intervention and to determine whether it was more effective in preventing doping than an educational (i.e., knowledge-based) intervention; their primary outcome was doping likelihood, and the secondary outcomes were moral identity, moral disengagement, moral atmosphere, and anticipated guilt.Methods: Eligible athletes (N = 303) in the United Kingdom and Greece took part in the study. The authors randomly assigned 33 clubs to either the moral or the educational intervention. They measured outcomes pre- and postintervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.Results: Athletes in both interventions in both countries reported lower doping likelihood and moral disengagement and higher guilt from pre- to postintervention. These effects were maintained at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. There were no effects on moral identity or moral atmosphere.Conclusions: In addition to disseminating information about doping, doping prevention programs should include content that focuses on moral variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF