Search

Aim: To assess the perceived quality, and variation in quality, of Neonatal Induction Programmes in preparing medical staff to attend deliveries and deliver neonatal resuscitation if required. To delineate the components of an induction programme and the systems processes that would optimise medical staff training in delivering neonatal resuscitation., Methods: We conducted a nationwide (United Kingdom [UK]) survey of all junior doctors working within paediatric/neonatal posts as well as the persons responsible for organising their local Neonatal Induction Programme., Results: We received 237 respondents from diverse roles. Practitioners feel only somewhat effectively prepared to attend deliveries and deliver neonatal resuscitation. More concerningly, they report moderate-to-high levels of variation across different centres. Practical training is considered more important than theoretical; and basic topics more useful than advanced. The preferred approach to neonatal resuscitation training is a locally determined programme within a framework of national standards/recommendations., Conclusion: Practitioners feel that the quality, and particularly variation in quality, of neonatal resuscitation training at induction across the United Kingdom is suboptimal. Staff indicated the utility of a framework of national standards, and indeed this survey has been instrumental in the publication of such standards by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health., (© 2022 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The United Kingdom, like many countries, is strongly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The vaccination campaign was launched last December. Ghislaine Young, a nurse, and Jim Hodgson, a general practitioner, both retired, are offering their services as vaccinators to help fight this epidemic. By the end of Febuary 2021, more than 20 million people had already been vaccinated., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Occupational and environmental airborne asbestos concentrations are too low and variable for lifetime exposures to be estimated reliably, and building workers and occupants may suffer higher exposure when asbestos in older buildings is disturbed or removed. Mesothelioma risks from current asbestos exposures are therefore not known., Methods: We interviewed and measured asbestos levels in lung samples from 257 patients treated for pneumothorax and 262 with resected lung cancer, recruited in England and Wales. Average lung burdens in British birth cohorts from 1940 to 1992 were estimated for asbestos-exposed workers and the general population., Results: Regression analysis of British mesothelioma death rates and average lung burdens in birth cohorts born before 1965 suggests a lifetime mesothelioma risk of approximately 0.01% per fibre/mg of amphiboles in the lung. In those born since 1965, the average lung burden is ∼1 fibre/mg among those with no occupational exposure., Conclusions: The average lifetime mesothelioma risk caused by recent environmental asbestos exposure in Britain will be about 1 in 10 000. The risk is an order of magnitude higher in a subgroup of exposed workers and probably in occupants in the most contaminated buildings. Further data are needed to discover whether asbestos still present in buildings, particularly schools, is a persistent or decreasing hazard to workers who disturb it and to the general population, and whether environmental exposure occurs predominantly in childhood or after beginning work. Similar studies are needed in other countries to estimate continuing environmental and occupational mesothelioma hazards worldwide, including the contribution from chrysotile.

Background: Cardiac arrest, particularly in children, often has a poor outcome and international guidelines highlight significant gaps in the evidence base for effective resuscitation. Whilst randomised controlled trials for some interventions can be justified, they are not appropriate for many aspects of resuscitation. Therefore, guidelines must use other sources of data such as epidemiological evidence from cardiac arrest registries, to improve the efficacy of resuscitation. The aim of our study was to identify existing national cardiac arrest registries and document key information about the registries, including whether they contain data on paediatric arrests., Methods: Key bibliographic databases were searched for papers about or using data from cardiac arrest registries. Two reviewers independently screened the search results for relevant papers. A list of registers named in the papers was compiled and information obtained from the papers and the websites of registers where possible., Results: Twenty three active national or large regional cardiac arrest registries were identified. These included five international collaborations and 10 registries that cover a population of at least 10 million people. Twelve registries are based in Europe, five in North America, four in Asia and two in Australasia. The registries vary in their organisation, but the majority (20) defer to the Utstein reporting guidelines for cardiac arrest. Registries covered populations between 0.4 and 174.5 million and contained between 100 and 605,505 records. Sixteen collected data on out-of-hospital arrests only; three in-hospital arrests only; and four included both. For ten registers the number of paediatric arrests was available and ranged from 56 to 3900., Conclusions: To our knowledge this report contains the most complete list of active national and large regional cardiac arrest registries. Register data support current guidelines on effective resuscitation however, even the largest registries include relatively small numbers, particularly of paediatric events. A less fragmented approach has the potential to improve the utility of registration data for the benefit of patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)