Search

Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent female malignancy in the UK. Around 20% of cases are linked to weight gain, excess weight and health behaviours. We designed a weight gain prevention, health behaviour intervention for young women at increased risk. Methods: The study comprised a single arm observational study over 2 months testing acceptability and usability of the intervention: online group welcome event, app and private Facebook group. Females aged 18–35 years at moderate or high risk of breast cancer (>17% lifetime risk) were recruited via invite letters and social media posts. The app included behaviour change techniques and education content. Online questionnaires were completed at baseline, as well as at 1 and 2 months. We also assessed feasibility of study procedures. Results: Both recruitment methods were successful. Thirty‐five women were recruited, 26% via social media posts. Median age was 33 (interquartile range = 28.2–34.5) years, the majority (94.1%) were of White ethnicity. Thirty‐four participants were included in the analyses, of which 94% downloaded the app. Median self‐monitoring logs per participant during the study period was 10.0 (interquartile range = 4.8–28.8). App quality mean (SD) score was 3.7 (0.6) at 1 and 2 months (scale: 1–5). Eighty‐nine per cent rated the app at average or above at 1 month and 75.0% at 2 months. Nineteen women (55.9%) joined the Facebook group and there were 61 comments and 83 reactions and votes from participants during the study period. Conclusions: This first iteration of the app and intervention was well received and is suitable to progress to the next stage of refining and further testing. Highlights: The newly developed intervention that focused on weight gain prevention and health behaviour change was tested in young women at increased risk of breast cancer and was well‐received by the target population.Both recruitment methods, by mailshot and social media, were successful.The study was unable to recruit and ethnically diverse population.Future research should retest the intervention in a larger population, after making refinements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) manifests itself in many ways in the spine. This study aims to report the types of spinal lesions, clinical and demographic data in a large cohort from a complex NF1 centre. The characteristics of those with spinal neurofibromatosis, where neurofibromas are present on every spinal nerve root, were sought for comparison with the wider group of NF1 patients. This is a retrospective review of MDT minutes of 303 patients from a UK NF1 centre and the largest reported series of NF1 patients based on radiological data. Prevalence of each symptom and lesion was calculated and statistically significant associations were established. The most reported findings were cutaneous lesions (44.9%) and neurological deficit (27.4%). 28.4% had dural ectasia, 52.5% had some form of spinal deformity. 57.8% had spinal nerve root tumours, the most common of which were at C2. The most progressive lesions were spinal nerve root tumours (29.1%). The only statistically significant association found was between dural ectasia and spinal deformity (P < 0.003), where dural ectasia is associated with a 32.6% increase in spinal deformity incidence. This is the largest descriptive study of spinal lesions in NF1. Spinal tumours and spinal deformity are prevalent in NF1. The predilection of spinal tumours for flexible spinal regions suggests that repetitive movement might be an important factor in pathogenesis. Physicians and patients should be alert to the observation that although many spinal neurofibromatosis patients display no neurological deficit, they often have significant lesions which require monitoring and sometimes surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We tested the hypothesis that body mass index (BMI) aged 20 years modifies the association of adult weight gain and breast cancer risk., Methods: We recruited women (aged 47-73 years) into the PROCAS (Predicting Risk Of Cancer At Screening; Manchester, UK: 2009-2013) Study. In 47,042 women, we determined BMI at baseline and (by recall) at age 20 years, and derived weight changes. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for new breast cancer using Cox models and explored relationships between BMI aged 20 years, subsequent weight changes and breast cancer risk., Results: With median follow-up of 5.6 years, 1142 breast cancers (post-menopausal at entry: 829) occurred. Among post-menopausal women at entry, BMI aged 20 years was inversely associated [HR per SD: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95)], while absolute weight gain was associated with breast cancer [HR per SD:1.23 (95% CI: 1.14-1.32)]. For post-menopausal women who had a recall BMI aged 20 years <23.4 kg/m 2 (75th percentile), absolute weight gain was associated with breast cancer [HR per SD: 1.31 (95% CIs: 1.21-1.42)], but there were no associations for women with a recall BMI aged 20 years of >23.4 kg/m 2 (P interaction values <0.05)., Conclusions: Adult weight gain increased post-menopausal breast cancer risk only among women who were <23.4 kg/m 2 aged 20 years.