Search

Background and purpose: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (FLCs) may be a more sensitive marker of intrathecal immunoglobulin (Ig)G synthesis compared with oligoclonal bands (OCBs). Our aim was to retrospectively determine the additional value of the kappa and lambda index (CSF FLC/serum FLC)/(CSF albumin/serum albumin) in predicting a multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis in a group of OCB‐negative patients with suspected MS. Methods: The CSF and serum kappa and lambda FLCs were tested using the Freelite kit (serum) and Freelite Mx (CSF) assay (The Binding Site Group, Bimingham, UK) in 391 OCB‐negative patients with suspected/possible MS and in 54 OCB‐positive patients with MS. Results: The CSF kappa FLC levels were below the detection limit (0.27 mg/L) in 61% of patients. Using quantitative data, we found the best kappa index cut‐off value for the prediction of MS to be 5.8. A kappa index ≥5.8 was present in 25% of OCB‐negative MS (23/92) and in 98% of OCB‐positive patients with MS. Using a qualitative approach and a kappa index cut‐off of 5.9, based on literature data, we likewise found that 24% of OCB‐negative patients with MS had a kappa index ≥5.9, compared with 5.4% of OCB‐negative patients without MS (P < 0.001). No reliable data could be obtained for the lambda index; lambda FLCs were below the detection limit (0.68 mg/L) in 90% of CSF samples. Conclusions: The kappa index could contribute to the identification of OCB‐negative patients with a high probability of an MS diagnosis. Using more sensitive techniques might even improve the diagnostic performance of the kappa index and better define the role of the lambda index. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the real-world comparative effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness, from a UK National Health Service perspective, of natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RES-RRMS)., Methods: Real-world data from the MSBase Registry were obtained for patients with RES-RRMS who were previously either naive to disease-modifying therapies or had been treated with interferon-based therapies, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, or teriflunomide (collectively known as BRACETD). Matched cohorts were selected by 3-way multinomial propensity score matching, and the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and 6-month-confirmed disability worsening (CDW6M) and improvement (CDI6M) were compared between treatment groups. Comparative effectiveness results were used in a cost-effectiveness model comparing natalizumab and fingolimod, using an established Markov structure over a lifetime horizon with health states based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Additional model data sources included the UK MS Survey 2015, published literature, and publicly available sources., Results: In the comparative effectiveness analysis, we found a significantly lower ARR for patients starting natalizumab compared with fingolimod (rate ratio [RR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.73) or BRACETD (RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.42-0.53). Similarly, CDI6M was higher for patients starting natalizumab compared with fingolimod (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55) and BRACETD (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.85). In patients starting fingolimod, we found a lower ARR (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80) compared with starting BRACETD, but no difference in CDI6M (HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50). Differences in CDW6M were not found between the treatment groups. In the base-case cost-effectiveness analysis, natalizumab dominated fingolimod (0.302 higher quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] and £17,141 lower predicted lifetime costs). Similar cost-effectiveness results were observed across sensitivity analyses., Conclusions: This MSBase Registry analysis suggests that natalizumab improves clinical outcomes when compared with fingolimod, which translates to higher QALYs and lower costs in UK patients with RES-RRMS.