Search

Background: Dysmenorrhoea, or period pain, is a prevalent gynaecological condition that can result in functional interference during menstruation. Despite the significant disruption dysmenorrhoea can have on functioning and well-being, medical help-seeking rates are low. Little is known about what factors may predict help-seeking for dysmenorrhoea. Objectives: The current study aimed to test the predictive validity of the Behavioural Model of Health Services Use (BMHSU) for help-seeking behaviour in dysmenorrhoea, whereby help-seeking behaviour was operationalised as having attended to a healthcare professional for dysmenorrhoea-related care. Design: A cross-sectional observational design was used. Methods: Participants (N = 439) completed an online survey, which measured the following eight predictor variables: menstrual pain characteristics, health beliefs, self-efficacy, social support utilisation and satisfaction, perceived healthcare availability, and pain intensity and interference. Participants were also asked to report whether they had ever attended to a healthcare professional for their menstrual pain. Results: The BMHSU accounted for 8% of the variance in help-seeking behaviour. Pain interference and appointment availability were significant predictors of the variance in past help-seeking behaviour, such that those who experienced greater pain interference, and those who perceived greater availability of healthcare appointments were less likely to have visited a healthcare professional for their menstrual pain. The BMHSU had an overall 69% classification accuracy in predicting help-seeking behaviour. Conclusion: Although the BMHSU demonstrated reasonably good model fit, it does not appear to be a particularly robust model for predicting help-seeking behaviour for dysmenorrhoea. Future research should explore whether a refined BMHSU or an alternative theoretical model can provide more useful insight into this behaviour. Better understanding of the determinants of help-seeking behaviour will enable the development of interventions to promote appropriate help-seeking and improve health outcomes for individuals with menstrual pain. Plain language summary: What makes people with period pain seek help? Many people experience common period pain, which can be severe and debilitating. Even though it can make daily life difficult, not many people seek medical help for period pain. The purpose of this study was to find out why people with period pain might or might not go to a doctor for help. We used a theoretical framework called the Behavioural Model of Health Services Use to try to understand this. This framework tells us that predisposing factors like age or health beliefs, enabling factors like family support and access to healthcare, and need factors like severe symptoms, can predict whether someone will go to the doctor. We wanted to test if this way of thinking could accurately predict if someone with period pain had been to see a doctor. We asked people with period pain to fill in an online survey. We asked about things like how painful their periods were, what they believed about their menstrual health, how confident they felt in managing their pain, whether they got support from others, if they thought healthcare was available, and how much the pain affected their lives. We also asked if they had ever gone to a doctor for help with their period pain. We found that these factors were not very accurate in predicting whether people sought help for period pain. The most important predictors were how much the pain affected their lives and whether they believed that healthcare appointments were available to them. If the pain was very disruptive, and if they felt there were free appointments, people were less likely to have gone to see a doctor. This study was the first to use this way of thinking to understand help-seeking for people with period pain. In the future, researchers should test different models to see if they work better for understanding help-seeking behaviour for period pain. It is important to find ways to understand this behaviour to help people seek help for their pain when they need it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Dysmenorrhoea affects many adolescents with significant impacts on education and well-being. In the UK, most of the adolescents who seek care (and many never do), will do so through general practice (primary care). Knowing how best to care for adolescents reporting menstrual pain is an area where UK general practitioners would like better guidance and resources. Methods: This mixed-methods narrative synthesis collates community and specialist evidence from 320 papers about adolescent dysmenorrhoea, with a UK general practice community health perspective. Results: We report a narrative summary of symptoms, cause, consequences and treatments for adolescent dysmenorrhoea. We highlight areas of tension or conflicted evidence relevant to primary care alongside areas of uncertainty and research gaps identified through this synthesis with input from lived experience advisers. Discussion: There is little evidence about primary care management of adolescent dysmenorrhoea or specific resources to support shared-decision making in general practice, although there are evidence-based treatments to offer. Primary care encounters also represent potential opportunities to consider whether the possibility of underlying or associated health conditions contributing to symptoms of dysmenorrhoea, but there is little epidemiological evidence about prevalence from within community health settings to inform this. The areas where there is little or uncertain evidence along the care journey for adolescent dysmenorrhoea, including at the interface between experience and expression of symptoms and potential underlying contributory causes warrant further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]