Search

Background: In the United States, Black men have a higher risk of prostate cancer and worse survival than do White men, but it is unclear whether this is because of differences in diagnosis and management. We re-examined these differences in the United Kingdom, where health care is free and unlikely to vary by socioeconomic status.Methods: This study is a population-based retrospective cohort study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer with data on ethnicity, prognostic factors, and clinical care. A Delphi panel considered the appropriateness of investigations and treatments received.Results: At diagnosis, Black men had similar clinical stage and Gleason scores but higher age-adjusted prostate-specific antigen levels (geometric mean ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.15-1.73). Black men underwent more investigations and were more likely to undergo radical treatment, although this was largely explained by their younger age. Even after age adjustment, Black men were more likely to undergo a bone scan (odds ratio 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.80). The Delphi analysis did not suggest differential management by ethnicity.Conclusions: This UK-based study comparing Black men with White men found no evidence of differences in disease characteristics at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis, nor of under-investigation or under-treatment in Black men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Black men in England have three times the age-adjusted incidence of diagnosed prostate cancer as compared with their White counterparts. This population-based retrospective cohort study is the first UK-based investigation of whether access to diagnostic services underlies the association between race and prostate cancer. Prostate cancer was ascertained using multiple sources including hospital records. Race and factors that may influence prostate cancer diagnosis were assessed by questionnaire and hospital records review. We found that Black men were diagnosed an average of 5.1 years younger as compared with White men (P<0.001). Men of both races were comparable in their knowledge of prostate cancer, in the delays reported before presentation, and in their experience of co-morbidity and symptoms. Black men were more likely to be referred for diagnostic investigation by a hospital department (P=0.013), although general practitioners referred the large majority of men. Prostate-specific antigen levels were comparable at diagnosis, although Black men had higher levels when compared with same-age White men (P<0.001). In conclusion, we found no evidence of Black men having poorer access to diagnostic services. Differences in the run-up to diagnosis are modest and seem insufficient to explain the higher rate of prostate cancer diagnosis in Black men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To assess several molecular markers (detected by immunohistochemistry, IHC) to determine whether they can be used to improve the prognostic value of histological grade alone in predicting the behaviour of prostate cancer. Patients and methods Tumour tissue was retrieved from 156 men in whom tumour grade, stage and survival were known. The outcome measures were: (i) local stage (T-stage, organ-confined vs extraprostatic); (ii) metastatic status (M-stage, bone metastasis vs no bone metastasis); and (iii) survival. The IHC markers used were chosen to provide a broad representation of various aspects of tumour biology, i.e. the androgen receptor (AR) and oestrogen receptor (ER), adhesion molecules (E-cadherin), proliferation markers (MIB-1), tumour-suppressor genes (TP53 and the retinoblastoma gene product, Rb) and other novel cancer-related proteins (cyclin D1 and the breast cancer susceptibility gene product, BRCA2). All factors were assessed using logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards survival models for predictive value, after adjusting for effects. Results MIB-1, ER, cyclin D1 and E-cadherin all showed close statistically significant univariate associations with histological grade. Univariate analysis also identified close statistically significant associations between T-stage and both MIB-1 and E-cadherin. Likewise, there were close univariate associations for both M-stage and survival, and MIB-1, cyclin D1 and ER. Logistic regression modelling identified MIB-1, cyclin D1 and ER as statistically significant predictors of M-stage and, once MIB-1 was entered into the model, the effects of grade no longer made a significant contribution. MIB-1 was a significant predictor for T-stage, but the effects of grade remained significant in this model. Cox proportional-hazards modelling identified MIB-1, cyclin D1 and ER as being statistically significant predictors of survival, after adjusting for grade. After adjusting for both grade and MIB-1, the effects of cyclin D1 and ER were no longer statistically significant. Excess MIB-1, cyclin D1 or ER expression tended to be present within the most poorly differentiated and advanced-stage lesions; this provides an inherent instability to the models described. TP53, Rb, AR and BRCA2 were of limited prognostic value. Conclusions MIB-1, ER and cyclin D1 provide prognostic information that is clearly independent of grade. However, their true clinical value is probably limited because they are expressed mainly in the most advanced lesions. Nevertheless, MIB-1 expression is of sufficient value to warrant inclusion in future prognostic models. Furthermore, the expression of cyclin D1 and ER may reflect aspects of tumour biology that individually are worthy of further investigation. However, none of the IHC markers used in this study can be recommended for use in routine histological preparations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: It is known that African American men have a greater risk of prostate cancer than white men. We investigated whether this was true for first-generation black Caribbean and black African men in the United Kingdom., Methods: A clinical cohort study design recruiting all cases of prostate cancer diagnosed over a 5-yr period and residing in defined areas of London and Bristol. We calculated the age-standardised incidence rates and relative risk for all black men, and black Caribbean and black African men versus white men., Results: Black men had higher age-adjusted rates of prostate cancer (166 per 100,000, 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 151-180 per 100,000) than white men (56.4 per 100,000, 95%CI, 53.3-59.5 per 100,000). The relative risks for all black, black Caribbean, and black African men were 3.09 (95%CI, 2.79-3.43; p<0.0001), 3.19 (95%CI, 2.85-3.56; p<0.0001) and 2.87 (95%CI, 2.34-3.53; p<0.0001), respectively. There was no strong evidence that the rates for black Caribbean differed from black African men. The higher risk in black men compared with white men was more apparent in younger age groups (p value for interaction<0.001)., Conclusions: Black men in the United Kingdom have substantially greater risk of developing prostate cancer compared with white men, although this risk is lower than that of black men in the United States. The similar rates in black Caribbean and black African men suggest a common genetic aetiology, although migration may be associated with an increased risk attributable to a gene-environment interaction.