1. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, light intensity walking and a seated exercise trainer on venous return in healthy young adults: a quasi-experimental crossover study.
- Author
-
Bluett, Shannon, Jones, Alfie, Pearson, Kallum, and Samuel, Dinesh
- Subjects
- *
HEART rate monitoring , *BODY mass index , *CLINICAL trials , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *EXERCISE therapy , *PRODUCT design , *EVALUATION of medical care , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *HEMODYNAMICS , *WALKING , *EXERCISE equipment , *CROSSOVER trials , *HEART beat , *ALLIED health personnel , *BLOOD circulation , *ELECTRIC stimulation , *RESEARCH methodology , *ANALYSIS of variance , *BLOOD flow measurement , *BLOOD pressure , *DATA analysis software , *PATIENT monitoring , *SYSTOLIC blood pressure , *ADOLESCENCE - Abstract
Background/Aims: The growing prevalence of sedentary behaviour across the life course is linked to an increased risk of chronic venous disease and related mortality, warranting the need for non-invasive interventions to improve blood flow and lower extremity function. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in venous blood flow, heart rate and blood pressure after 8 minutes of using the Leeper device, Circulation Booster and light intensity walking. Methods: A quasi-experimental crossover study involving 11 participants (eight women, three men, mean age 23.91 years, standard deviation 1.04 years) was conducted using Leeper and Circulation Booster devices and light intensity walking. During each intervention, participants exercised for 8 minutes, and blood flow was recorded at 0, 4 and 8 minutes. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at 0 and 8 minutes. Blood flow was the primary outcome measure, and heart rate and blood pressure were secondary outcomes. Participants rested for 10 minutes between exercise. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyse the effect of intervention and time on blood flow, blood pressure and heart rate. Results: There was no significant interaction between intervention and time on blood flow (P=0.180) indicating that blood flow did not change over time depending on intervention. There was no significant main effect of time on blood flow (P=0.206), indicating that no intervention caused a significant increase or decrease in blood flow after 8 minutes of exercise. Conclusions: The interventions involving the Leeper and Circulation Booster devices and light intensity walking did not appear to significantly increase blood flow in young adults. Further studies involving participants from older age groups and those with pathological interventions are warranted to examine the potential effectiveness of these interventions. Implications for practice: The findings may assist with the advice that allied health professionals provide regarding the use of seated exercise trainers and EMS devices and their ability to influence changes in blood flow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF