Search

Autistic adults who have a history of committing crimes present a major problem for providers of services in terms of legal disposal options and possible interventions, and greater understanding of this group and their associated needs is required. For this reason, we aimed to investigate the face validity of a proposed sub-typology of autistic adults detained in secure psychiatric hospitals in the United Kingdom. Initially, a focus group was completed with psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, healthcare workers, family members and autistic adults who had been detained in hospital, leading to revisions of the sub-typology. Following this, a consensus rating exercise of 10 clinical vignettes based on this sub-typology with three rounds was completed with 15 psychiatrists and clinical psychologists; revisions to the vignettes to improve clarity were made following each round. The findings indicated that these subtypes possess face validity and raters were able to classify all 10 clinical case vignettes into the sub-typology, and percentage of agreement ranged from 96% to 100% for overall subtype classification. This study suggests that the further validity of the sub-typology should be investigated within a larger study, as these subtypes have the potential to directly inform the hospital care pathway such that length of stay can be minimised.

Background: People with intellectual disability (ID) and epilepsy are more likely to die prematurely than the general population. A significant number of deaths in people with epilepsy may be potentially preventable through better seizure control, regular monitoring and raising awareness among patients and carers. The aim of this project was to study mortality from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in adults with ID. Methods: All adults (=20 years old) living in Leicester city, Leicestershire and Rutland, UK, with ID between 1993 and 2010 were identified using the Leicestershire Intellectual Disability Register database. People with and without ID who died during the same period were identified using death certificate data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Deaths from probable and definite SUDEP were identified. Additional information on adults with ID who had died from probable or definite SUDEP was obtained from case notes and post-mortem reports, where available. Cases of probable and definite SUDEP in adults with ID were compared with the general population using standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). Results: A total of 898 adults with ID had died over the 18-year study period. Of these, 244 deaths (27%) occurred in people with ID who had a diagnosis of epilepsy. Twenty-six people with ID died from probable or definite SUDEP, which was the second most common cause of death among adults with ID and epilepsy. All-cause specific SMRs were 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-2.4] and 2.8 (95% CI: 2.5-3.1) for men and women with ID respectively. SMRs were 3.2 (95% CI: 2.7-3.8) and 5.6 (95% CI: 4.6-6.7) for men and women with epilepsy and ID respectively. During the same study period, 83 adults without ID had died of probable or definite SUDEP. The SMRs for SUDEP in patients with ID were 37.6 for men (95% CI: 21.9-60.2) and 52.0 for women (95% CI: 23.8-98.8). We found that in the majority of ID cases there was little detailed documentation on the circumstances surrounding deaths, no communication with patients/carers about risk of SUDEP and an absence of post-mortem reports or carers' referral for bereavement counselling. Conclusion: The authors believe that a comprehensive risk management under a multiagency/multidisciplinary framework should be undertaken for all adults with ID and epilepsy in day-to-day clinical practice to reduce mortality in people with ID.

Background: Antipsychotics are perceived to be over-used in the management of behavioural problems in people with an intellectual disability (ID). Published guidelines have set good practice standards for the use of these drugs for behavioural indications. We sought to identify the range of indications for which antipsychotic drugs are prescribed in people with ID and to audit clinical practice against the standards. Method: Data were collected from the clinical records of individuals with ID who were under the care of mental health services in the UK, and prescribed an antipsychotic drug. Results: The sample comprised 2319 patients from 39 clinical services. Twenty-seven per cent of the patients had a diagnosis of a psychotic illness (ICD-10 F20-29) and 27% an affective illness (ICD-10 F30-39). The proportion who did not have a psychiatric diagnosis ranged from 6% of those with borderline/mild ID to 21% of those with severe/profound ID. Overall, the most common indications for prescribing an antipsychotic drug were comorbid psychotic illness, anxiety and agitation, and a range of behavioural disturbances. The prevalence of use of antipsychotic drugs to manage challenging behaviour in the absence of concomitant mental illness increased with the severity of ID and accounted for almost half of prescriptions in those with severe/profound ID. Adherence to the audit standards related to documentation of clinical indications and review of efficacy was high. Side effect monitoring was less assiduous. Conclusions: In clinical practice, most prescriptions for antipsychotic drugs in people with ID are consistent with the evidence base and the overall quality of prescribing practice, as measured against recognised standards, is good, although in some patients potentially remedial side effects may not be detected and treated.

Teenagers with intellectual disabilities (ID) have significantly more health problems than the rest of the population and many encounter difficulties accessing the services they need during the transition from children's to adult services. A multidisciplinary, interagency study was carried out in one area of the UK with the intent to estimate the number of teenagers with ID between the ages of 16 and 19, their levels of mental and physical healthcare needs, their carers' perceptions of the transition process to adult services and unmet needs, and to make recommendations on how to address unmet needs. A mapping exercise was carried out to identify all teenagers aged 16-19 with ID known to local services; a postal questionnaire was sent to carers of all eligible teenagers; and then in-depth interviews carried out with a sample of carers. Most of the teenagers had significant levels of ID, multiple problems, and required constant supervision. Most of the teenagers were using a range of health, social care and education services, however, their carers still reported unmet needs; half had difficulty in accessing services. Different patterns of service use and unmet needs were found among the various ethnic groups identified in the sample. Only about a quarter of the carers interviewed were satisfied with the transition process. Authors found that carers were concerned about the lack of information concerning transition planning and adult services, and wanted earlier, more coordinated transition planning. The data confirmed the need for quality information and validated standardized tools that could be used for transition planning. Recommendations are that integrated referral systems for health and social care need to be developed, with links to clear care pathways, and that individual and systemic outcomes should be monitored. (Contains 6 tables and 2 figures.)

Background: UK policies aim to facilitate access to general psychiatric services for adults with intellectual disability (ID). If this is to be achieved, it is important to have a clear idea of the characteristics and proportion of people with ID who currently access specialist psychiatric services and the nature and extent of psychiatric disorders in this population. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on all adults with ID using specialist services in Leicestershire and Rutland, UK, between 2001 and 2006. Characteristics of individuals seen by psychiatric services and the nature and prevalence of psychiatric disorders were investigated. Results: Of 2711 adults identified, 1244 (45.9%) accessed specialist psychiatric services at least once during the study period. Individuals attending psychiatric services were more likely to be older and to live in residential settings; they were less likely to be south Asian or to have mild/moderate ID. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among the total study population was 33.8%; the most common disorders were behaviour disorder (19.8%) and autistic spectrum disorders (8.8%). Epilepsy was highly prevalent (60.8%) among those attending psychiatric services without a mental health diagnosis. Behaviour disorders and autistic spectrum disorders were more common in men and in adults with severe/profound ID, whereas schizophrenia and organic disorders were more common in women and in adults with mild/moderate ID. Depression was also more common in women with ID. Conclusions: Psychiatric disorders and specialist health problems are common among adults with ID and the profile of psychiatric disorders differs from that found in general psychiatry. Close collaboration between general and specialist service providers is needed if the current move towards use of general psychiatric services in this population is to be achieved. The measures should include a clear care pathway for people with ID and mental health problems to facilitate the smooth transfer of patients between specialist and generic mental health services and arrangements for joint working where input from both services is required. The commissioning framework for such processes should be in place with appropriate pooling of resources.

Abstract: With the increase in lifespan, age-related mental and physical health problems have become evident in people with learning disability. Owing to the heterogeneity of the population, the nature and extent of age-related changes has not been explored fully. This article describes the mental health problems in older adults with learning disabilities with a focus on dementia, and highlights current evidence-based practice. To date, the main focus of research and service initiatives related to ageing has been on dementia in Down syndrome, despite the fact that a substantial proportion of older people with learning disabilities in general suffer from a variety of health problems. Clinical practice varies considerably within UK, and the link between community learning disability teams and mental health services for older people is not well established in many areas. The clinical challenges are related to a lack of standardized assessment processes and difficulties in carrying out the full range of investigations in some cases. The recently published national guideline on dementia in people with learning disabilities has now set the expected service standards and provides an audit tool against which quality of care can be measured. It is to be hoped that this will encourage the development of a dementia care pathway, removing the barriers in access to services for older people with learning disabilities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]