Search

Background Recent work in the UK estimated the prevalence of current cannabinoid-based vaping to be higher than in the USA, a factor previously associated with e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI). Research in the USA has demonstrated that attendances to emergency departments relating to e-cigarettes began to rise before the EVALI outbreak, suggesting that vapers also experience milder forms of vaping-related illness. Aim Quantify symptom prevalence and healthcare utilization amongst current UK vapers. Design Voluntary online survey of individuals aged 16 and over within the UK. Methods Anonymized data were collected on demographics, vaping/smoking status and vaping substances used. Current vapers were asked about the presence of 10 prevalent symptoms from previous US EVALI case series, healthcare attendances and diagnoses given. Risk-ratios were calculated to compare the likelihood of symptoms and attendances between substances. Results A total of 2477 complete responses were analysed. In all, 397 respondents were current vapers. Symptom prevalence within the previous 12 months ranged from 3.8% to 30.5% (bloody sputum, cough). Healthcare attendances per symptomatic respondent ranged from 0.1 to 1.4 (bloody sputum, shortness of breath). Current vapers of cannabinoid-based products (alone/in combination) had the most attendances per symptomatic respondent for 9/10 symptoms and were more likely to report symptoms aside from 'cough' (nicotine-free e-liquids [risk ratio = 1.7]). Clinicians reportedly never diagnosed vaping-related illness. Conclusions UK vapers experience symptoms previously reported in EVALI cases for which they also seek healthcare. Users of cannabinoid-based products were more likely to report symptoms and accounted for a higher healthcare burden. UK vapers may also experience vaping-related illness that does not meet EVALI case criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Vaping of cannabinoid-based products and informal acquisition of vaping products were associated with the outbreak of E-cigarette or vaping associated lung injury (EVALI) in the USA. Current prevalence of cannabinoid-based vaping within the UK is not known and literature regarding the acquisition of vaping products is limited. Aim To estimate the prevalence of nicotine-based, nicotine-free and cannabinoid-based product vaping within the UK and to determine where vaping products are acquired. Design and methods A voluntary online survey of individuals aged 16 and over within the UK was conducted using a convenience sample. Data were collected on respondent demographics, smoking/vaping history and acquisition of e-liquids/products. Results A total of 2478 responses were included. Median age 45 years (interquartile range 35–57). Prevalence of current vaping of nicotine-based e-liquids, nicotine-free e-liquids and cannabinoid-based products was 14.4%, 11.2% and 5.49%, respectively. Current nicotine-based and nicotine-free vaping was most prevalent in 25–34 years olds (22.4% and 19.2% of respondents). Current cannabinoid-based vaping was most prevalent in 16–24 years olds. The most common 'ever' used cannabinoid-based products were cannabidiol oil/cannabigerol oil and cannabis leaves (4.8%). Specialist vaping stores were the most common source of 'ever' acquisition for all products. 36.8% and 40.5% of respondents who had ever vaped nicotine-based and nicotine-free e-liquids reported prior acquisition from informal sources. Conclusion This survey reported a higher prevalence of current cannabinoid-based vaping within the UK (5.5%) than previously reported in the USA (2.0%). In addition to the informal acquisition of vaping products as demonstrated within the survey, these results highlight potential underestimation of the risk of EVALI within the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recreational drug use can cause significant acute toxicity and is typically associated with the utilisation of hospital/prehospital emergency medical services and health-care costs. Aims: To determine the impact of recreational drug toxicity on the utilisation of emergency medical services and subsequent drug use. Design and Methods: A total of 2472 UK participants completed an anonymous online cross-sectional questionnaire. The use of emergency medical services for acute recreational drug and/or ethanol toxicity and its impact on drug use were surveyed. Results: Four hundred and sixty-one (19%) had previously utilised emergency medical services following drugs/ethanol; of these, 57% (259) attended a hospital emergency department, out of which 59% (152) needed hospital admission. Forty-three percent (49 of 113 respondents) believed their most recent episode that required medical assistance was due to using 'too much drug'. Forty-five percent (50 of 112 respondents) stated they would continue to use or increase their drug use. Ten percent (11) reported that the episode had resulted in them stopping use. Conclusions: A significant proportion of individuals used hospital/prehospital emergency services for acute toxicity after recreational drugs and/or ethanol use. This caused little impact on behaviour in relation to subsequent use. More work is needed to understand how to use these episodes to change patterns of drug and/or ethanol use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent work in the UK estimated the prevalence of current cannabinoid-based vaping to be higher than in the USA, a factor previously associated with e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI). Research in the USA has demonstrated that attendances to emergency departments relating to e-cigarettes began to rise before the EVALI outbreak, suggesting that vapers also experience milder forms of vaping-related illness., Aim: Quantify symptom prevalence and healthcare utilization amongst current UK vapers., Design: Voluntary online survey of individuals aged 16 and over within the UK., Methods: Anonymized data were collected on demographics, vaping/smoking status and vaping substances used. Current vapers were asked about the presence of 10 prevalent symptoms from previous US EVALI case series, healthcare attendances and diagnoses given. Risk-ratios were calculated to compare the likelihood of symptoms and attendances between substances., Results: A total of 2477 complete responses were analysed. In all, 397 respondents were current vapers. Symptom prevalence within the previous 12 months ranged from 3.8% to 30.5% (bloody sputum, cough). Healthcare attendances per symptomatic respondent ranged from 0.1 to 1.4 (bloody sputum, shortness of breath). Current vapers of cannabinoid-based products (alone/in combination) had the most attendances per symptomatic respondent for 9/10 symptoms and were more likely to report symptoms aside from 'cough' (nicotine-free e-liquids [risk ratio = 1.7]). Clinicians reportedly never diagnosed vaping-related illness., Conclusions: UK vapers experience symptoms previously reported in EVALI cases for which they also seek healthcare. Users of cannabinoid-based products were more likely to report symptoms and accounted for a higher healthcare burden. UK vapers may also experience vaping-related illness that does not meet EVALI case criteria., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians.)

Background: Vaping of cannabinoid-based products and informal acquisition of vaping products were associated with the outbreak of E-cigarette or vaping associated lung injury (EVALI) in the USA. Current prevalence of cannabinoid-based vaping within the UK is not known and literature regarding the acquisition of vaping products is limited., Aim: To estimate the prevalence of nicotine-based, nicotine-free and cannabinoid-based product vaping within the UK and to determine where vaping products are acquired., Design and Methods: A voluntary online survey of individuals aged 16 and over within the UK was conducted using a convenience sample. Data were collected on respondent demographics, smoking/vaping history and acquisition of e-liquids/products., Results: A total of 2478 responses were included. Median age 45 years (interquartile range 35-57). Prevalence of current vaping of nicotine-based e-liquids, nicotine-free e-liquids and cannabinoid-based products was 14.4%, 11.2% and 5.49%, respectively. Current nicotine-based and nicotine-free vaping was most prevalent in 25-34 years olds (22.4% and 19.2% of respondents). Current cannabinoid-based vaping was most prevalent in 16-24 years olds. The most common 'ever' used cannabinoid-based products were cannabidiol oil/cannabigerol oil and cannabis leaves (4.8%). Specialist vaping stores were the most common source of 'ever' acquisition for all products. 36.8% and 40.5% of respondents who had ever vaped nicotine-based and nicotine-free e-liquids reported prior acquisition from informal sources., Conclusion: This survey reported a higher prevalence of current cannabinoid-based vaping within the UK (5.5%) than previously reported in the USA (2.0%). In addition to the informal acquisition of vaping products as demonstrated within the survey, these results highlight potential underestimation of the risk of EVALI within the UK., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Analysis of anonymous pooled urine samples from street urinals has been used to demonstrate time-trends in the detection of classical recreational drugs and novel psychoactive substances (NPS)., Aim: This study aimed to expand this to undertake a geographical trend analysis of classical recreational drugs/NPS across UK., Methods: Samples of anonymous pooled urine were collected from street urinals that had been in place for one night in April 2014 in nine cities across the UK. Collected samples were then analysed for the presence of recreational drugs, NPS anabolic steroids using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution accurate mass full-scan mass spectrometry and gas chromatography coupled to electron impact ionization mass spectrometry operating in selected ion monitoring and full-scan modes., Results: Ten classical recreational drugs, nine NPS and four anabolic steroids were detected across the nine cities; the range of detection was from 1 in Leeds to 14 in London. The most common classical drugs were cocaine (9 cities) and 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (8 cities); the most common NPS was 4-methylmethcathinone (5 cities). In addition there was variation in the detection of NPS, with methylhexaneamine detected only in Bristol and London, piperazines (3-trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine and 1-benzylpiperazine) and pentedrone only detected in Birmingham and the cathinone methylone only detected in London., Conclusions: There is variability in the detection of classical recreational drugs, NPS and anabolic steroids across UK, likely reflecting variation in their use. This technique can be used to supplement drug use surveys to determine geographical and time trends in the use of these substances. This is important to ensure appropriate targeting of drug-related interventions., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Context: There is increasing interest in the analysis of waste water at sewage treatment plants to monitor recreational drug use. This technique is limited for novel psychoactive substances (NPS) due to limited knowledge on their human and bacterial metabolism and stability in waste water. Small studies have reported the detection of NPS using pooled anonymous urine samples, which eliminates some of these potential confounders., Objective: To determine patterns of recreational drug, including NPS, use by confirming their presence in analysis of pooled urine from portable street urinals across a wide geographical area in central London over a 6-month period., Materials and Methods: Pooled anonymous urine samples were collected from 12 four-bay stand-alone portable urinals distributed once a month across central London for six consecutive months. Samples were analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry (LC-HRAM-MS); acquired data were processed against target compound databases., Results: With regards to Classical Recreational Drugs, there was consistency of detection of cathine, cocaine, morphine, MDMA over the 6 months, with variability of detection of amphetamine, ketamine and cannabis. With regards to NPS, a total of 13 NPS were detected during the six months. Mephedrone and methylhexaneamine were detected consistently each month. Other commonly detected NPS included methiopropamine (5 months), pipradrol (4 months), cathinone (4 months), 5-(2-aminopropyl)benzofuran (3 months) and 4-methyethcathinone (3 months). Of note, methoxetamine and the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists were not detected in any samples., Discussion: Previous studies using the same method detected three and five NPS in a nightclub and pissoir setting, respectively, on a single night. The longer sampling time of 6 months has allowed detection of 13 NPS. Of note, mephedrone showed the least month-to-month variation in detection over the 6-month sampling period. With regards to classical recreational drugs, those detected were consistent with use-data from UK population surveys. The only exception is amphetamine which these surveys have shown a steady decline in use since 1996 but our study showed some variation in the frequency of its detection. However, the sampling period was too short and a longer study is needed to detect the trend in decreasing use., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that analysis of anonymous pooled urine samples from stand-alone urinals can be used to detect and monitor trends in the use of classical recreational drugs and NPS in a large city centre over time. This technique has the potential to be a novel key indicator alongside other existing indicators to provide a more robust picture of the use of recreational drugs including NPS.