Search

This column discusses the Anatomy Act 1977 (NSW) and its regulatory environment. The column begins with examining the history of anatomy regulation in the United Kingdom and Australia. It then goes on to analyse the history of the current anatomy regulation in New South Wales, pointing out areas for reform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century anatomy depended upon a variety of visual displays. Drawings in books, particularly expensive, beautiful and elaborately illustrated books that have been the objects of historians' fascination, were understood to function alongside chalk drawings done in classrooms, casual and formalized experience with animal and human corpses, text describing or contextualizing the images, and preserved specimens. This article argues that British anatomists of the late Enlightenment discovered and taught an intelligible, orderly Nature through comprehensive systems of display. These systems trained vision, and, taken as a whole, they can be used to understand a visual culture of science. Displays helped anatomists, artists and natural philosophers learn to see both the tiniest and the rarest of parts and an overall general plan of anatomy and relationship of parts. Each type of display was materially different from the others and each served to perfect human vision for a group of natural philosophers who valued sensory experience – primarily that of vision, but also that of touch – as the basis of learning. Together, these displays allowed the anatomist to see, in all of its dimensions, human nature, frozen in the ordered and unstressed state of fresh death, a comprehensible guide to life and its functions. A pedagogical context of use defined and bound such displays together as complementary parts of a unified project. A system of display stood in for Nature and at the same time represented her ordering by anatomists. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper attempts a comprehensive account of 'fibre medicine' elaborated by iatromechanists from c. 1700 to c. 1740. Fibre medicine, a medical theory informed by the notion of the fibre, has been neglected by medical historians despite the pivotal role played by the fibre in animal economy. Referring to a wide range of medical fields such as anatomy, physiology, pathology, therapeutics and life sciences, this paper elucidates the ways that the fibre serves as an indispensable concept for iatromechanists to establish their medical theories. This paper also highlights the metaphorical dimension of the fibre as an integral part of fibre medicine. In re-evaluating the concept of the fibre, this paper seeks to redress the neuro-centric view of eighteenth-century medicine, and attempts to locate the fibre body amidst the fundamental shift from humoralism to solidism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arthur Keith (1866-1955) was a renowned anatomist who published 529 contributions emphasizing the interaction between structure, function, and patient care. His only practice was 4 years as a family doctor, although he later trained to be a surgeon. Ten of his many articles related to hernia; two (1906, 1924) dealt with etiology. In these he rejected Russell's congenital saccular theory of abdominal herniation, since the latter's assertions regarding peritoneal diverticula were not supported by embryological research. Instead, Keith became the first to hypothesize that defects in the belly wall of adults were brought about by pathological damage to fasciae, aponeuroses and tendons, secondary to systemic connective tissue disease abetted by aging. The pelvis was similarly afflicted, leading to vaginal prolapse, the most common hernia among women. Diverticula were likely to sprout from a weakened alimentary tract. He stated that prevention was a serious consideration. The surgical establishment, overburdened by dogmas accumulated from 5,000 years of being solely responsible for the care of patients with herniae, ignored his hypothesis for decades. However, recent research in herniology has made him a prophet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article informs about the return of public anatomy lectures at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland after more than 180 years.