Search

Objective: Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) is a safe and effective method of inducing temporary tolerance and gradually increasing the dose over a few hours to a few days, thereby preventing severe hypersensitivity reactions. Despite the limited number of pediatric desensitization studies in the literature, it is important to explore this area further to provide better treatment options for patients. This study will determine the safety and efficacy of desensitization and present management strategies for breakthrough reactions in pediatric patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 14 pediatric patients with drug HSRs who underwent drug desensitization between January 2020 and January 2024. The desensitization protocols used were developed by Castells and consisted of a 12-step protocol with 3 parenteral preparations with increasing concentrations. The standard protocol included premedication with antihistamine (pheniramine) and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg) 30 minutes before the infusion. Results: The study involved 14 patients. A total of 64 desensitizations were carried out for 16 different drugs. Only 13% resulted in mild to severe reactions. Overall, almost 92% of all desensitizations were successful. Additionally, it is important to highlight that all breakthrough reactions (BRs) occurred with monoclonal antibodies. Mild BRs during RDD were associated with more severe reactions during the next RDDs. No BRs were seen during RDD in patients with mild initial reactions. Conclusion: It is important to note that desensitization is not an extreme method, and that pediatric age is not a contraindication. Desensitization is a safe and successful method for children, with a positive impact on survival and overall prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The longer diagnostic intervals in low- and middle-income countries have been proposed among the possible causes of poorer outcomes in children with cancer. In this single-center study from Turkey, the diagnostic intervals and survival status of 138 children with solid tumors and lymphoma (excluding leukemia) were prospectively evaluated. The median total interval (from the beginning of the first cancer-related symptom to the first day of the cancer-specific therapy), the median patient interval (the time interval from the notification of the first cancer-related symptom to the first admission to a healthcare facility), and the median physician interval (the time interval between the first healthcare admission to the first pediatric oncology visit) were 65, 26, and 24 days, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 80.7% and 69.1%, respectively. The longer time intervals were correlated with age, paternal education, localization, and tumor type. Interestingly, none of the time parameters were found to be associated with survival on regression analysis. In conclusion, the diagnostic delay in children with cancer is multifactorial, and the patient- and disease-related factors are as important as the time intervals on survival. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08880018.2021.1951903 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:A novel type of Coronavirus emerged at Wuhan in late 2019 involving preferentially the respiratory system. Owing to the rapid spread, almost 22 million people became infected and 700,000 died. Similar to other countries, the need for additional hospital beds and intensive care units required diversion of health care resources toward the care for those with COVID-19 in Turkey. Telemedicine appeared as a safe and low-cost alternative for the maintainability of pediatric health services during the pandemics. Within this context, we aimed to deliver the health services through telemedicine during the follow-up of chronic childhood diseases. Materials and Methods:This prospective study included five pediatric subspecialties, including allergy immunology, hematology and oncology, nephrology, rheumatology, and inborn metabolic disorders. After the interview, patients and involved physicians were requested to fill out a questionnaire designed to measure the level of satisfaction and the quality of the service we offered. Results:Of the 263 interviews, overall patient and physician satisfaction was 99% and 87%, respectively. As results of the interviews, 250 routine visits were performed, 181 acute complaints were assessed, drug changes were made in 118 patients, 9 patients were determined to be unable to get their drugs, and 12 who misused their drugs. The main advantage of the telemedicine declared by the patients was "not to waste time for transportation." The main concerns of the participants were inability to perform physical and laboratory examinations. Conclusion:Consequently, we considered telemedicine as a feasible alternative not only during pandemics but also in daily practice in Turkey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between involvement in bullying behaviors and school, family, and peer factors. Health Behavior in School Age Children survey questionnaire was used. Of the students surveyed, 20% were both bully and victim, 11% were bully, and 21% were victim. Being male, poor parental support, and poor monitoring by the father were found to be risk factors for being both bully and victim. Poor academic achievement, having peers at different ages, poor quality of friendship, poor communication with parents, and not being isolated by peers were found to be risk factors for being bully. Not liking school, feeling pressured by school work, poor quality of friendship, poor monitoring by the father, close bonding with mother, and poor status of the peer group were found to be risk factors for being victim. These findings highlight the importance that bullying intervention programs should include country-specific and culture-specific influences for success. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]