Search

Abstract: Objective: To translate into Arabic and validate the SF-36 quality of life index in a Tunisian Arabic population. Background: No validated Arabic quality of life index is published. Design: Arabic translation of the SF-36 scale was obtained by the “forward/backward translation” method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study involving 22 subjects from general population. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by use of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient (convergent and divergent validity), and factor analysis with Varimax rotation. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha coefficient. Results: We note that 130 Tunisian subjects were included in the validation study. No items were excluded. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC=0.98). Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.94 conferring to translated index a good internal consistency. Expected divergent and convergent validity results suggested good construct validity. Two main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 62.3% of the cumulative variance: the first factor represented mental component, the second physical component. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.88 and 0.91 respectively for factor 1 and factor 2. Conclusion: We translated into Arabic language and adapted the SF-36 scale for use in Tunisian population. The Arabic version is reliable and valid. Although the scale was validated in a Tunisian population, we expect that it is suitable for other Arab populations, especially North Africans. Further studies are needed to confirm such a hypothesis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To translate into Arabic and validate the “American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form” (ASES) for use in a Tunisian population presenting with periarticular pathologies of the shoulder. Background: No functional index assessing the functional capacities of the shoulder is presently available in Arabic. Patients and methods: The translation was achieved by means of forward/backward translation. Adaptations were carried out subsequent to a preliminary test involving 15 persons. Patients with periarticular shoulder disabilities were included. Clinical measurements evaluated pain and functional disability by means of the visual analogue scale (VAS). Interrater concordance (repeatability) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factorial analysis followed by orthogonal rotation. The internal consistency of each factor was graded in terms of the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Results: Eighty (80) patients were included in the study. Interrater concordance was excellent (ICC=0.96). The Bland and Altman method showed a low-variability mean difference. Correlations of the index score with the pain VAS (r =−0.49) and functional disability (r =−0.58) suggested satisfactory convergent validity, and our index likewise showed good discriminant validity. Factorial analysis led to the extraction of two factors with a cumulative variance rate of 92.6% that could not be explained. Conclusion: Translated into Arabic, the ASES index was found to possess high metrological qualities. While the index has been satisfactorily validated with regard to a Tunisian population, additional studies are needed to verify its applicability to other Arab populations. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]