Search

Initial medical certificate is a descriptive medical and legal document whose purpose is to prove the existence of a damage and to enable the victim to access his or her right. The purpose of our study was to study the content and to evaluate the writing quality of initial medical certificates. We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study over an 18-month period, from January 2017 to June 2018. We collected data from 450 initial medical certificates at the Forensic Medicine Department of the Charles Nicolle University Hospital in Tunis. The quality of the initial medical certificates was assessed using a template that allowed to assign them a score out of 30. A mean score was mainly assigned to initial medical certificates Template scores ranged between 9.5 and 27.5/30 with an mean of 18.59/30. General practitioners and specialist physicians, such as ophthalmologists, neurosurgeons and doctors using the support provided by the Ministry of Health wrote better certificates. Similarly, we noted better quality of writing when certificates dealt with intentional assaults and injuries. Our study shows that the majority of initial medical certificates does not conform to editorial guidelines. These shortcomings are probably related to the fact that doctors have never received adequate medical-legal training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The aim of our retrospective study was to analyze the short- and long-term follow-up of 298 renal transplantations performed between June 1986 and May 2005. All were first transplantations except 4 cases, with 54 from cadaveric and 244 from living donors. The recipients included 196 males and 102 females of overall mean age of 31.21 ± 8.9 years (range, 16–61 years). A combination of prednisolone and azathioprine was presented for 212 patients or mycophenolate mofetil for 86 patients. Polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were used as induction therapy in 183 cases. Cyclosporine was administered to 188 cases and tacrolimus only to 16. HLA matching was 0 mismatches (MM) in 65 cases; 1 or 2 MM in 113; 3 MM in 99; and ≥4 MM in 21. Acute tubular necrosis occurred in 45 cases. One hundred eighteen patients experienced at least 1 acute rejection episode: 102 cases (41.8%) among living and 16 (29.6%) among cadaveric kidneys donor (P = .0007). The actuarial patient and graft survival rates at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 95.9%, 87.4%, 77.5%, 65.6%, and 60.8%, and 94.9%, 84.5%, 75.4%, 65.4%, and 53%, respectively. Sixty-three patients died and 72 patients returned to dialysis. Our results were comparable to experienced centers. However, the member of kidney transplantations does not match the increased number of patients on renal replacement therapy. It is advisable to promote obtaining organs from brain-dead donors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]