Search

The article discusses a study which examined the prevalence of bacterial antibiotic resistance in patients in intensive care units (ICU). The study included ICU patients who were admitted in hospitals in Jerusalem and Toronto, Ontario. It discovered that 19 percent of the study population developed resistant organisms. Study authors concluded that end-of-life treatment is associated with the development of resistant bacteria.

Background: In the 2003 Toronto SARS outbreak, SARS-CoV was transmitted in hospitals despite adherence to infection control procedures. Considerable controversy resulted regarding which procedures and behaviours were associated with the greatest risk of SARS-CoV transmission. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors for transmission of SARS-CoV during intubation from laboratory confirmed SARS patients to HCWs involved in their care. All SARS patients requiring intubation during the Toronto outbreak were identified. All HCWs who provided care to intubated SARS patients during treatment or transportation and who entered a patient room or had direct patient contact from 24 hours before to 4 hours after intubation were eligible for this study. Data was collected on patients by chart review and on HCWs by intervieweradministered questionnaire. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression models and classification and regression trees (CART) were used to identify risk factors for SARS transmission. Results: 45 laboratory-confirmed intubated SARS patients were identified. Of the 697 HCWs involved in their care, 624 (90%) participated in the study. SARS-CoV was transmitted to 26 HCWs from 7 patients; 21 HCWs were infected by 3 patients. In multivariate GEE logistic regression models, presence in the room during fiberoptic intubation (OR = 2.79, p = .004) or ECG (OR = 3.52, p = .002), unprotected eye contact with secretions (OR = 7.34, p = .001), patient APACHE II score ≥20 (OR = 17.05, p = .009) and patient Pa02/Fi02 ratio ≤59 (OR = 8.65, p = .001) were associated with increased risk of transmission of SARSCoV. In CART analyses, the four covariates which explained the greatest amount of variation in SARS-CoV transmission were covariates representing individual patients. Conclusion: Close contact with the airway of severely ill patients and failure of infection control practices to prevent exposure to respiratory secretions were associated with transmission of SARS-CoV. Rates of transmission of SARS-CoV varied widely among patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of CJEM: Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The healthcare setting was important in the early spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in both Toronto and Taiwan. Healthcare workers, patients, and visitors were at increased risk for infection. Nonetheless, the ability of individual SARS patients to transmit disease was quite variable. Unrecognized SARS case-patients were a primary source of transmission, and early detection and intervention were important to limit spread. Strict adherence to infection control precautions was essential in containing outbreaks. In addition, grouping patients into cohorts and limiting access to SARS patients minimized exposure opportunities. Given the difficulty in implementing several of these measures, control measures were frequently adapted to the acuity of SARS care and level of transmission within facilities. Although these conclusions are based only on a retrospective analysis of events, applying the experiences of Toronto and Taiwan to SARS preparedness planning efforts will likely minimize future transmission within healthcare facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Background Invasive Group A streptococcal (iGAS) infections remain a substantial source of morbidity and mortality. We explore the clinical and molecular epidemiology of iGAS infections in Toronto, Ontario, Canada over a 26-year period. Methods The Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network has performed population-based surveillance for iGAS infections in metropolitan Toronto and Peel regions since 1992. Participating microbiology laboratories report and submit sterile site specimens for central processing. M typing was performed on iGAS isolates until September 2006; thereafter emm typing was performed. Clinical information was collected by chart review using standardized collection forms. Results Over the 26-year period there were 2819 iGAS infections, representing an average incidence of 2.85 per 100,000 residents with a nadir of 1.65 in 1993 and a peak of 4.52 in 2014. Nosocomial infections occurred in 8.9% (251/2,819). There was substantial variation in annual incidence rates over the study period with increases from 1992 until 2002 and then 2004 until 2014 (analysis for trend, P < 0.001). Skin and soft-tissue infections were the most common clinical presentation, accounting for 33.2% (936/2,819), followed by bacteremia without a focus in 15.4% (435/2,819). Necrotizing fasciitis was observed in 7.4% (208/2,819) and criteria for toxic shock syndrome were met in 17.6% (497/2,819). Overall case fatality within 30 days of hospitalization was 15.3% (95% confidence interval 14.0 to 16.6) and did not change over time. M serotype distribution varied yearly with the most common type being M1 at 22.2% (626/2,189) followed by M12 at 8.2% (230/2,189), then M89 at 5.8% (163/2,189). Antibiotic susceptibility was available from 1998 onwards with overall clindamycin susceptibility at 92.3% (1,957/2,121) and erythromycin susceptibility at 87.9% (1864/2,121). Conclusion The incidence of iGAS in Toronto, Ontario has varied over time, with no recent increase apparent. Similar to worldwide observations, M1 serotype was the most commonly isolated; most common serotypes demonstrated cyclical variation. Case fatality rates have remained relatively constant making the development of a vaccine imperative. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Data on factors associated with the use of antiviral medication to treat influenza in both children and adults are limited. Objectives To describe trends in antiviral use, analyze factors associated with antiviral treatment of hospitalized patients with influenza, and to compare use based on guidelines. Study design A retrospective observational cohort of hospitalized patients with laboratory confirmed influenza in southern Ontario hospitals for the 2004/05–2013/14 seasons. Results Of the 7967 patients, 18% of the 1779 children (<15 years) and 66% of the 6188 adults received antiviral therapy. The percentage treated increased from 29% pre-pandemic to 74% during the pandemic, decreased to 55% in 2011/12 and then increased to 65% in 2013/14. Factors significantly associated with antiviral prescription across all age groups during the non-pandemic seasons include influenza type, disease severity, interval between symptom onset and test sample submission, and clinician suspicion of influenza. Rate of treatment of patients meeting guideline criteria was low for children and moderate for adults. Conclusions Since the pandemic, there has been a sustained increase in the use of antiviral medication for all age groups of hospitalized patients with influenza, but much higher for adults than children. The odds of treatment are higher for patients with more severe disease as well as for those tested within 48 h of symptom onset, both of which are part of the guidelines for treatment with anti-influenza medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]