Search

Financial incentives can facilitate behavior change and service engagement in health care settings, but research on their use with adults experiencing homelessness is limited. This study examined the effectiveness of financial incentives in improving service engagement and health outcomes among homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto. The authors of this randomized controlled trial recruited 176 participants receiving brief multidisciplinary case management services for homeless adults with mental illness after hospital discharge. In a 1:1 randomization design, 87 participants received a financial incentive of CAN$20 for every week they remained engaged with the service for up to 6 months. The remaining 89 participants received treatment as usual. The primary outcome was service contact rates for up to 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included self-reported health status, mental health symptoms, substance use, quality of life, housing stability, acute health service use, and working alliance. Negative binomial regression models, analyses of covariance, generalized estimating equations models, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to examine differences between the financial incentive and treatment-as-usual groups across outcomes of interest. No significant differences were found between the financial incentive and treatment-as-usual groups in service contact rates or any of the secondary outcomes examined over the 6-month period. In low-barrier, brief case management programs tailored to the needs of adults experiencing homelessness, financial incentives may not affect service engagement or health outcomes. Further research is needed to identify the effect of financial incentives on engagement in other services, including housing-based interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People experiencing homelessness and mental illness have poorer service engagement and health-related outcomes compared to the general population. Financial incentives have been associated with increased service engagement, but evidence of effectiveness is limited. This protocol evaluates the acceptability and impact of financial incentives on service engagement among adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness in Toronto, Canada. Methods: This study protocol uses a pragmatic field trial design and mixed methods (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03770221). Study participants were recruited from a brief multidisciplinary case management program for adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness following hospital discharge, and were randomly assigned to usual care or a financial incentives arm offering $20 for each week they attended meetings with a program provider. The primary outcome of effectiveness is service engagement, measured by the count of participant-provider health-care contacts over the 6-month period post-randomization. Secondary health, health service use, quality of life, and housing outcomes were measured at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential modeling including Poisson regression and generalized estimating equations. A subset of study participants and other key informants participated in interviews, and program staff in focus groups, to explore experiences with and perspectives regarding financial incentives. Qualitative data will be rigorously coded and thematically analyzed. Conclusions: Findings from this study will contribute high quality evidence to an underdeveloped literature base on the effectiveness and acceptability of financial incentives to improve service engagement and health-related outcomes among adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Homelessness constitutes a traumatic period that adversely impacts health and quality of life outcomes. The potential mitigating effects of resilience on quality of life levels in people experiencing homelessness are underresearched. This study assesses the longitudinal associations between resilience and quality of life scores among adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness.Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected over 6 years from participants (N = 575) of the At Home/Chez Soi study on Housing First, Toronto site. Repeatedly measured resilience scores are the primary exposure and repeatedly measured global quality of life scores and mental health-specific quality of life scores are the primary outcomes. Mixed effect models were used to assess the association between the exposures and the outcomes.Results: The majority of the participants were men (69.2%) and were on average 40.4 (± 11.8) years old at baseline. The average resilience score ranged between 5.00 to 5.62 over 8 data collection points across the 6-year follow-up period. After adjusting for gender, age, ethno-racial background, Housing First intervention, physical and mental comorbidities, and lifetime homelessness, higher resilience scores were positively associated with higher Global quality of life (Adjusted-coefficient: 0.23, 95% CI 0.19-0.27) and mental health-related quality of life values (Adjusted-coefficient: 4.15, 95% CI 3.35-4.95).Conclusion: In homeless adults with mental illness, higher resilience levels were positively associated with higher global and mental health related quality of life values. Further interventions and services aimed to enhance resilience mechanisms and strategies are warranted to enhance better mental health and quality of life outcomes of this population group.Trial Registration: At Home/Chez Soi trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN42520374. Registered 18 September 2009, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN42520374. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]