Search

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in elective colorectal surgery remain high due to intraoperative exposure of colonic bacteria at the surgical site. We aimed to evaluate 30-day SSI outcomes of a novel wound retractor that combines barrier protection with continuous wound irrigation in elective colorectal resection., Materials and Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort-matched analysis included all patients undergoing elective colorectal resection utilizing the novel irrigating wound protector (IWP) from April 2015 to July 2019. A control cohort of patients who underwent the same procedures with a standard wound protector over the same time period were also identified. Patients from both groups were matched for procedure type, procedure approach, pathology requiring operation, age, sex, race, body mass index, diabetes, smoker status, hypertension, presence of disseminated cancer, current steroid or immunosuppressant use, wound classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologist classification. SSI frequency, SSI subtype (superficial, deep, or organ space), hospital length of stay (LOS) and associated procedure were tabulated through 30 postoperative days. Fisher's exact test and number needed to treat (NNT) were used to compare SSI rates and estimate cost between both groups., Results: The IWP group had 41 patients. The control group had 82 patients. Control-matched variables were similar for both groups. 30-day SSI rates were significantly lower in the IWP group (P=0.0298). length of stay was significantly shorter in the IWP group (P=0.0150). The NNT for the IWP to prevent one episode of SSI was 8.2 patients., Conclusions: The novel IWP device shows promise to reducing the risk of SSI in elective colorectal surgery., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Frailty is an emerging risk factor for surgical outcomes; however, its application across large populations is not well defined. We hypothesized that frailty affects postoperative outcomes in a large health care system., Study Design: Frailty was prospectively measured in elective surgery patients (January 2016 to June 2017) in a health care system (4 hospitals/901 beds). Frailty classifications-low (0), intermediate (1 to 2), high (3 to 5)-were assigned based on the modified Hopkins score. Operations were classified as inpatient (IP) vs outpatient (OP). Outcomes measured (30-day) included major morbidity, discharge location, emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and direct-cost/patient., Results: There were 14,530 elective surgery patients (68.1% outpatient, 31.9% inpatient) preoperatively assessed (cardiothoracic 4%, colorectal 4%, general 29%, oral maxillofacial 2%, otolaryngology 8%, plastic surgery 13%, podiatry 6%, surgical oncology 5%, transplant 3%, urology 24%, vascular 2%). High frailty was found in 3.4% of patients (5.3% IP, 2.5% OP). Incidence of major morbidity, readmission, and mortality correlated with frailty classification in all patients (p < 0.05). In the IP cohort, length of stay in days (low 1.6, intermediate 2.3, high 4.1, p < 0.0001) and discharge to facility increased with frailty (p < 0.05). In the OP cohort, ED visits increased with frailty (p < 0.05). Frailty was associated with increased direct-cost in the IP cohort (low, $7,045; intermediate, $7,995; high, $8,599; p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Frailty affects morbidity, mortality, and health care resource use in both IP and OP operations. Additionally, IP cost increased with frailty. The broad applicability of frailty (across surgical specialties) represents an opportunity for risk stratification and patient optimization across a large health care system., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) improves patient safety and outcomes; however, barriers to effective use include the perceived negative impact on operating room (OR) efficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of SSC implementation on OR efficiency., Methods: All operations at our large multispecialty tertiary care hospital were reviewed for 1-year pre- and 1-year post-SSC implementation. OR efficiency included operating room time, operation time, first starts on time, same-day cancellations, and OR disposable cost., Results: A total of 35,570 operations were reviewed: 17,204 pre-SSC and 18,366 post-SSC. There was no difference between groups for operating room time (P = .93), operation time (P = .66), first starts on time (P = .15), and same-day cancellations (P = .57). The mean OR disposable cost was significantly lower ($70/operation) for the post-SSC group (P < .01)., Conclusions: The implementation of an SSC does not negatively impact OR efficiency and should not be considered a barrier to effective use. Our data suggest that SSC use can reduce overall cost per surgical procedure., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)