1. Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent Microsatellite-Stable Endometrial Cancer in Early-Phase Immunotherapy Clinical Trials.
- Author
-
How, Jeffrey A., Jazaeri, Amir A., Fu, Siqing, Rodon Ahnert, Jordi, Gong, Jing, Stephen, Bettzy, Ferreira Dalla Pria, Hanna, Bhosale, Priya, Johnson, Amber, Yuan, Ying, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, and Naing, Aung
- Subjects
- *
THERAPEUTIC use of antineoplastic agents , *DRUG efficacy , *IMMUNE checkpoint inhibitors , *CLINICAL trials , *SPECIALTY hospitals , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *CANCER relapse , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *ACQUISITION of data , *ANTINEOPLASTIC agents , *CANCER patients , *CANCER treatment , *COMPARATIVE studies , *ENDOMETRIAL tumors , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *MEDICAL records , *PROGRESSION-free survival , *IMMUNOTHERAPY , *LONGITUDINAL method , *EVALUATION - Abstract
Simple Summary: There is a crucial need to improve treatment regimens in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. Although immunotherapy treatments have shown impressive benefit in microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer, they have been less predictable in the majority of endometrial cancers, which are microsatellite stable. Our aim was to characterize clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent microsatellite stable endometrial cancer treated in early-phase immunotherapy clinical trials in order unravel treatment regimens that would improve response and survival. Our findings suggest that utilizing immunotherapy in combination with other non-immunotherapy agents resulted in greater duration of disease control and improved survival outcomes compared to immunotherapy only (monotherapy) or in combination with other immunotherapy agents. Future studies are needed to validate these findings. Recurrent microsatellite stable (MSS) endometrial cancer has poor response to conventional therapy and limited efficacy with immune checkpoint monotherapy. We conducted a retrospective study of recurrent MSS endometrial cancer patients enrolled in immunotherapy-based clinical trials at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Patients were evaluated for radiologic response using RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Thirty-five patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: 8 with monotherapy, 17 with immunotherapy (IO) in combination with another IO-only, and 10 with IO in combination with non-IO therapy. Among those treated with combination IO plus non-IO therapy, one had a partial response but 50% had clinical benefit. Patients who received combination IO plus non-IO therapy had improved PFS compared to those who received monotherapy (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.97; p = 0.037) or combination IO-only therapy (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15–0.90; p = 0.028) and had improved OS when compared to monotherapy after adjusting for prior lines of therapy (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27–0.95; p = 0.036). The potential beneficial clinical outcomes of combination IO plus non-IO therapy in MSS endometrial cancer should be validated in a larger study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF