Search

Presents the summary of the study "A Three-Part Intervention To Change the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Response to New Evidence," which was published in the July 20, 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.

Background: Some previous studies suggested that transplantation performed in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients was associated with a higher rate of complications and poorer outcomes. We examined more than a decade of experience with solid organ transplantation at a single center and compared VA patients with nonveteran patients to assess long-term patient and graft survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL)., Methods: Demographic, clinical, and survival data were extracted from a database that included all transplants from January 1990 through December 2002 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (non-VA) and the Nashville VA Medical Center (VA). The HRQOL was assessed in a subset of patients using the Karnofsky functional performance (FP) index and the Short-Form-36 self-report questionnaire. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival and analysis of variance methods., Results: One thousand eight hundred nine adult patients receiving solid organ transplants (1,896 grafts) between 1990 and 2002 were reviewed: 380 VA patients (141 liver, 54 heart, 183 kidney, 2 lung) and 1429 non-VA patients (280 liver, 246 heart, 749 kidney, 154 lung). Mean follow-up time was 46 +/- 1 months. Five-year graft survival for VA and non-VA patients, respectively, was liver 65% +/- 5% versus 69% +/- 3% (P = 0.97); heart 73% +/- 8% versus 73% +/- 3% (P = 0.67); and kidney 76% +/- 5% versus 77% +/- 2% (P = 0.84). Five-year patient survival was liver 75% +/- 5% versus 78% +/- 3% (P = 0.94); heart 73% +/- 8% versus 74% +/- 3% (P = 0.75); and kidney 84% +/- 4% versus 87% +/- 2% (P = 0.21) for VA and non-VA, respectively. In the first 3 years after transplant, the FP scores for VA versus non-VA patients were 85 +/- 2 versus 87 +/- 1 (P = 0.50). The SF-36 mental component scales were 47 +/- 3 versus 49 +/- 1 (P = 0.39); and the SF-36 physical component scales were 37 +/- 2 versus 38 +/- 1 (P = 0.59), respectively. Longer-term (through year 7) HRQOL scores for VA versus non-VA patients were FP 85 +/- 1 versus 88 +/- 1 (P = 0.17); mental component scales 47 +/- 2 versus 49 +/- 1 (P = 0.29); and physical component scales 35 +/- 2 versus 39 +/- 1 (P = 0.05), respectively., Conclusions: The veteran patients have similar graft and patient survival as the nonveteran patients. Overall quality of life is similar between veterans and nonveterans during the first three years after transplantation. A trend toward a later decline in the veterans' perception of their physical functioning may stem from the increased prevalence of hepatitis C virus among VA liver transplant recipients, a known factor reducing late HRQOL.

In this study, we compared results of 28 liver transplants performed in 25 patients referred through the Veterans Administration with 82 transplants performed in 75 nonveteran patients. The evaluation and follow-up care was provided by the same team of physicians and nurses and the transplant procedure performed in the same hospital for both patient groups. There was a significantly greater incidence of hepatitis C and/or previous alcohol abuse in veteran compared with non-VA patients [23/25 (92%) vs 29/75 (39%); P < 0.05] and a greater incidence of native portal vein thrombosis [6/25 (24%) vs 2/75 (2.6%); P < 0.01], but no difference in Child's-Pugh score (10.8 vs 9.9) or UNOS listing status (mean status 2.7 vs 2.8). The increased incidence of native portal vein thrombosis did not appear to be solely related to previous alcohol abuse or hepatitis C, since only 1 of 29 (3.4%) non-VA patients with these etiologies had this finding. There was no difference in patient or graft survival between the VA and non-VA groups with overall actuarial 6-, 12-, and 18-month patient survival of 86, 84, and 83% and graft survival of 80, 78, and 77%. There was no difference in major complication rates but there was a significantly longer average hospital stay (27 +/- 31 vs 18 +/- 12 days; P < 0.05) in the VA compared with non-VA group. One patient with native portal vein thrombosis in the non-VA group developed portal vein thrombosis in the postoperative period. There was no documented recidivism in any patient with a history of prior substance abuse in either group. This study confirms that veteran patients have a higher incidence of hepatitis C and previous alcohol abuse as causes of liver disease, have a higher incidence of native portal vein thrombosis, and have longer mean hospital stays, but experience the same survival in the first 18 months compared with nonveteran patients.