Search

Ticks are vectors and reservoirs of a variety of pathogens including protozoa, bacteria and viruses which cause tick-borne diseases (TBDs) in humans and livestock. TBDs pose serious constraints to the improvement of livestock production in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Despite their wide distribution, information on the tick and pathogen relationship is scarce in Tanzania. We used nested PCR and sequencing to screen pathogens of public and veterinary health importance in ticks collected by flagging from four districts of Tanzania. In total, 2021 ticks comprising nine species were identified. DNA from ticks was pooled according to tick species, developmental stage, and location, then screened for Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis, Theileria parva and Coxiella burnetii. Out of 377 pools, 34.7% were positive for at least one pathogen. Theileria parva was the most abundant with a minimum infection rate (MIR) of 2.8%, followed by B. bigemina (MIR = 1.8%) and B. bovis (MIR = 0.8%). Multiple pathogens detection was observed in 7.2% of the tested pools. However, PCR screening of individual tick DNA revealed that only 0.3% of the examined pools had co-infection. DNA of C. burnetii was never detected in any tick DNA pool. The MIR of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) differed significantly among districts, seasons, tick species, and tick developmental stages. Sequence analysis showed that B. bigemina RAP-1a, B. bovis SBP-4, and T. parva p104 genes were conserved among pathogens in the four districts. Despite the absence of C. burnetii in ticks, considering its pathogenic potential, it is essential to continue monitoring for its possible recurrence in ticks. This information adds to the knowledge of TBPs epidemiology and will contribute to the scientific basis for planning future control strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tick-borne diseases including East Coast fever, anaplasmosis and babesiosis constitute a major constraint to improving livestock production worldwide, including Tanzania. Determination of the prevalence and factors associated with the occurrence of pathogens in cattle is important for informed decision making on the control and prevention of these diseases. However, little is known about the epidemiology of these pathogens in cattle in some regions of Tanzania. Therefore, this study aimed at establishing the prevalence of Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis and Theileria parva in cattle, determine the risk factors associated with infection with these pathogens and also to assess tick control practices in Gairo and Monduli districts of Tanzania. Out of the 520 cattle sampled, the majority (82.9%) were infested with ticks of different species, predominated by Rhipicephalus decoloratus (42.7%), Amblyomma variegatum (31.3%), Rhipicephalus pulchellus (23.1%) and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (17.7%). Other ticks that were found on cattle included Rhipicephalus microplus (15.8%), Amblyomma gema (13.8%), Rhipicephalus evertsi (12.9%), Amblyomma lepidum (8.1%), Hyalomma truncatum (2.9%) and Hyalomma albiparmatum (2.1%). On microscopy 23 (4.4%) of 520 cattle were positive for hemoparasites. Of the 23 positive cattle, 13 (2.5%), 6 (1.2%) and 3 (0.6%) were monolithically infected with A. marginale, T. parva, and B. bovis respectively, while one (0.2% %) had co-infections of T. parva and A. marginale. The number of positive cattle increased to 184 (35.4%), when they were subjected to detection with PCR. This included the 23 samples that were positive on microscopy. Based on PCR, the overall prevalence of the pathogens from the two districts was 11.5%, 11.2%, 6.2% and 2.5% for B. bigemina, A. marginale, T. parva and B. bovis, respectively. Hemoparasite co-infection occurred in 6.9% of the cattle examined. The prevalence of co-infections was 2.7%, 4%, and 0.02% for T. parva/A. marginale, B. bigemina/A. marginale and B. bigemina/A. marginale/T. parva, respectively. Cattle with co-infections had significantly lower (p < 0.005) mean packed cell volume as compared to cattle with mono-infections. The majority (96%) of cattle examined were subjected to different methods of tick control. A number of risk factors were shown to be associated with the occurrence of tick-borne pathogens in cattle. Higher prevalence of A. marginale may be due to its wide range of biological and mechanical transmission. These findings could be used to strengthen future control programs for ticks and tick-borne diseases in the study areas., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)