Search

This paper adopts the hierarchical analysis method to conduct in-depth research and analysis on the management of English education course performance and the construction of the English education course performance evaluation index system in colleges and universities based on the hierarchical analysis method. This paper aims to establish a scientific, standardized, rigorous, and objective index system, which is in line with the orientation of "combining theory and practice" at this stage of school. It follows the development trend of the "dual-teacher" and "innovative" mode, helps students to improve their learning level and practical ability to a certain extent, and allows teachers to go out of the textbook and into the curriculum to create a multifaceted and effective teaching space framework for students in the new era. On the other hand, we should also pay attention to the correlation between the selected indicators, scientifically analyze the indicators, and try to eliminate the interaction between the indicators. This evaluation system is comprehensive and scientific, relevant to schools, inspiring to teachers, and intuitive to students, which is conducive to teachers' innovative teaching methods, breaking the original curriculum model, enabling teachers and students to easily get out of the original curriculum "silo" circle, and allowing teachers to find the breakthrough of the curriculum with half the effort. The performance results of the school were obtained through statistical analysis and attributed through individual interviews. To build an innovation and entrepreneurship education resource integration and sharing mechanism, the information management center of the innovation and entrepreneurship education training platform was established to integrate the innovation and entrepreneurship education information resources; by creating a community of interests, a collaborative mechanism was built inside and outside the school; finally, an interoperable and linked training platform network structure was formed. Finally, based on the results of the university's performance analysis and comparative reference to the relevant practices of universities in Taiwan, we propose countermeasures to improve the performance of the general education curriculum system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]