Search

Purpose: Osteoporosis is an important public health challenge given its high prevalence in western populations and the prevalence has shown an upward trend in recent decades in Asia. However, epidemiological evidence on the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and mortality risk in the Asian population is sparse., Methods: The Cox proportional hazards model and cause-specific hazard models were used to investigate the association of BMD with the risk of all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality., Results: The present study comprised of 3,332,207 person-years with a median follow-up of 14.6 years. 27,508 participants (15,967 men and 11,541 women) died among 233,397 participants (112,348 men and 121,049 women) during the follow-up period. Compared to those with normal BMD level, both men and women with low BMD had a significantly higher risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer mortality after adjusting for the covariates. [For men with osteoporosis: all-cause: 1.37 (1.27-1.49); CVD: 1.28 (1.08-1.52); cancer: 1.29 (1.12-1.49); For women with osteoporosis: all-cause: 1.72 (1.63-1.82); CVD: 1.85 (1.64-2.08); cancer: 1.47 (1.35-1.61)]. The P for interactions for BMD with sex were significant for all-cause and CVD mortality. The adverse effects of BMD on the risk of all-cause and CVD were higher in women than in men [men vs. women: all-cause: 1.37 (1.27-1.49) vs. 1.72 (1.63-1.82); CVD: 1.28 (1.08-1.52) vs. 1.85 (1.64-2.08)]. In the nonlinear dose-response analyses, the association between BMD increments and all-cause mortality risk shows an L-shaped pattern in men and a similar U-shaped trend in women (P for non-linear association: <0.001). Likewise, a similar L-shaped association was observed between BMD levels and cancer mortality risk in men., Conclusions: Low BMD had an increased risk of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality in both men and women. Women had a stronger positive association between low BMD and an increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality compared to men., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To estimate the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in women undergoing major gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with an expected surgical duration exceeding 1 hour and anticipated overnight hospitalization., Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study., Setting: This study was set at a university hospital., Patients: One hundred forty female patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I or II and scheduled for gynecologic inpatient laparoscopic surgery., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 mg granisetron (Group A, n=70), or saline solution (Group B, n=70) intravenously after induction of general anesthesia., Measurements and Main Results: The endpoints were evaluated by the following parameters: the incidence of PONV, episodes of nausea, retching, vomiting, rescue antiemetics, and complete response. Patients were closely observed for 24 hours after administration of the study drug. The two groups were generally well balanced in terms of demographic variables. The surgical period was longer in the granisetron group compared with the saline solution group. The total incidence of PONV was 41/70 (59%) in patients who underwent inpatient gynecologic laparoscopic surgery when no prophylactic antiemetic was given. Administration of granisetron decreased the incidence of PONV (29/70 [41%] vs 41/70 [59%], p<.05), the incidence of vomiting (18/70 [26%] vs 31/70 [44%], p<.05), and the proportions of patients requiring rescue antiemetics (14/70 [20%] vs 47/70 [67%], p<.01), but these results were not comparable to other studies., Conclusion: A long surgical period may have great impact on the PONV in women who undergo gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, which implies the need for skilled gynecologic laparoscopists.