Search

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of titrating dose of rivastigmine oral solution in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Taiwan. Methods: We recruited 108 mild to moderate AD patients with Rivast? (rivastigmine oral solution 2 mg/ml) treatment for 52 weeks. We recorded the demographic characteristics, initial cognition by mini-mental state examination (MMSE), initial global status by clinical dementia rating (CDR) with CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), initial dose, and titrating dose at each visit. We investigated the adherence, proportion of possible side effects, optimal dose, and time to optimal dose. We demonstrated the proportion of cognitive decline and its possible risk factors. Results: During the course, 9 patients discontinued the rivastigmine oral solution due to poor compliance or preference. Twelve out of 99 patients (12.1%) reported possible side effects. Among 87 patients, the mean age was 77.2 ± 9.0 years ago with female predominant (65.2%). The optimal dose was 3.6 ± 1.4 ml in average and 4 ml (n = 31, 35.6%) in mode. The duration to optimal dose was 12.5 ± 10.2 weeks and 24 weeks (n = 35, 40.2%) in mode. It presented 25% with cognitive decline in MMSE, 27% with global function decline in CDR and 63% with global function decline in CDR-SB. Conclusion: We demonstrated the clinical experience of rivastigmine oral solution in mild to moderate AD patients. It suggested rivastigmine oral solution 4ml is the optimal dose with 24 weeks to the optimal dose for at least one third of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Large-scale studies of utilization of medical services among patients with Alzheimer's disease ( AD) are lacking. We aimed to investigate the usage of Western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine ( TCM) among these patients in Taiwan. Methods We analyzed one million samples from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Patients ( n = 1814) newly diagnosed with AD in 2001-2010 were divided into TCM users ( n = 528) and non- TCM users ( n = 1286). Results Compared with non- TCM users, TCM users were younger, had a higher female:male ratio and higher utilization rate of Western medicine. The median interval between diagnosis and the first TCM consultation was 7.92 months. Donepezil and rivastigmine were commonly prescribed medications. Chinese herbal medicine was the most popular treatment among TCM users. Conclusions This study revealed the specific usage patterns of TCM and non- TCM medical services among patients with AD. The information could be used for improving the healthcare of patients with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer's type. This study assessed the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of rivastigmine in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a real-world clinical setting in Taiwan., Methods: This was a 48-week, single-arm, open-label, prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance, multicenter study. The primary outcomes were change from baseline to week 48 in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. One-year persistence to treatment, effect on activities of daily living, and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were also assessed., Results: Overall, 151 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 91 (60.26%) completed this study. At the end of the study, the mean rivastigmine dose received by the patients was 6.59 mg/day. At week 48, the changes in mean [standard deviation (SD)] MMSE and CDR scores in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population from baseline were - 1.00 (3.8; p = 0.0344) and 0.07 (0.29; p = 0.0403), respectively. The most frequently reported AEs by preferred term were dizziness (12.58%) and nausea (9.27%). No new or unexpected AEs were observed, and 30 (20.13%) patients in the ITT population were on rivastigmine therapy for 1 year without treatment discontinuation., Conclusion: Despite the low 1-year persistence rate, rivastigmine showed a stabilizing effect on declining cognition in patients with mild-to-moderate AD in a real-world scenario. Rivastigmine is well tolerated at 6.0-9.0 mg/day with no unexpected safety concerns., Funding: Novartis Co. Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan.

The aim of this small pilot study was to evaluate the association between plasma concentrations of rivastigmine and its metabolite, NAP 226-90, and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Rivastigmine-treated AD patients, who had been maintained on a fixed regimen of twice daily rivastigmine (6 to 12 mg/d) for ≥6 months, were eligible for evaluation. The assessments included cognitive assessment screening instrument (CASI) and clinical dementia rating scale, conducted at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. The 9 subdomains of CASI at baseline and follow-up were analyzed in relation to the plasma concentrations of rivastigmine and NAP 226-90, as measured by capillary electrophoresis. Logistic regression was performed to adjust for age, gender, education level, apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype status, and baseline CASI score to investigate the association between plasma rivastigmine and NAP 226-90 concentrations and the cognitive response. The total sample consisted of 53 clinically diagnosed AD patients taking rivastigmine only at doses of 6 mg to 9 mg/d because of intolerability at 12 mg/d. Higher rivastigmine concentration was significantly associated with improved or preserved short-term memory and worsened abstraction/judgment (p < 0.05), but not with changes in other domains (p > 0.05). Higher NAP 226-90 concentration was significantly associated with worsened abstraction/judgment (p < 0.05), but not with changes in other domains. Higher plasma rivastigmine concentration was significantly associated with improved or preserved short-term memory but worsened abstraction/judgment. An optimal concentration of rivastigmine should be quantified for each patient because of differential cognitive responses.

We report the case of an 88-year-old man with Alzheimer's disease (AD) of 8 years duration (emerging shortly after the de novo onset of sleeptalking) who developed REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) after increasing the nightly dose of rivastigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, from 1.5 mg to 3 mg (total daily dose, 4.5 mg), as therapy for his dementia. His family then became aware of recurrent nocturnal episodes arising from sleep of his leaving bed, and he sustained multiple abrasion injuries from falling down. Polysomnography (PSG), utilizing a seizure montage with fast paper speed, conducted with the patient taking rivastigmine 3 mg at bedtime, documented 3 abrupt episodes of bilateral arm-waving with moaning and shouting that emerged exclusively during each of the 3 REM sleep periods, with the duration of the episodes lasting 8 to 25 seconds. No epileptiform discharge appeared with the onset of these REM sleep behaviors. Therapy with clonazepam, 0.5 mg at bedtime (with ongoing 3 mg bedtime and 4.5 mg total daily rivastigmine therapy), fully suppressed the sleep-related events, with prompt relapse whenever clonazepam was not taken. This is the second reported case (both males with AD) of rivastigmine-induced RBD, and the oldest reported case of RBD; and it represents reversible, medication-induced, acute RBD.