Search

Propensity score matching evaluates the treatment incidence of radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) and secondary cancer risk (SCR) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for breast cancer patients. Of 32 patients treated with IMRT and 58 who received VMAT were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio. RP and SCR were evaluated as the endpoints of acute and chronic toxicity, respectively. Self-fitted normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) parameter values were used to analyze the risk of RP. SCRs were evaluated using the preferred Schneider's parameterization risk models. The dosimetric parameter of the ipsilateral lung volume receiving 40 Gy (IV 40 ) was selected as the dominant risk factor for the RP NTCP model. The results showed that the risks of RP and NTCP, as well as that of SCR of the ipsilateral lung, were slightly lower than the values in patients treated with VMAT versus IMRT (p ≤ 0.01). However, the organ equivalent dose and excess absolute risk values in the contralateral lung and breast were slightly higher with VMAT than with IMRT (p ≤ 0.05). When compared to IMRT, VMAT is a rational radiotherapy option for breast cancer patients, based on its reduced potential for inducing secondary malignancies and RP complications.

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix has been the leading malignant neoplasm treated in our department. A comparative study was carried out using conventional low dose rate (LDR) with 137Cs sources (less than or equal to 100 cGy/hr) versus high dose rate (HDR) with 60Co sources (greater than 100 cGy/min) in the intracavitary (IC) application following external pelvic irradiation. A total of 399 patients were treated with external RT plus HDR radiation treatment alone from February 1980 through December 1985. Stage IIb and IIIb comprised 79.4% of cases (317 cases). The rate of initial complete response of the tumor, local control, and survival rate seemingly were better in the HDR group, but there was no significant difference statistically. The actuarial survival rates in all cases/definitive RT cases are 85%/85% for Stage 0-IIa, 53%/70% for IIb, 43%/49% for IIIa, 43%/53% for IIIb, 42%/47% for IVa, respectively. Complications were similar and the rectal complications were slightly higher in HDR group. The combination of pelvic irradiation with HDR intracavitary irradiation was more convenient for patients and also for personnel. The HDR technique may be a good substitution for IC treatment.