Search

Objective: To monitor trends in central line-associated bloodstream infections and clinical sepsis (CLABICS) among neonates and to determine risk factors for infection, especially dwell time., Design: Prospective, single-center cohort study conducted from 2001 through 2008., Setting: University-affiliated tertiary care center., Methods: Individualized surveillance of catheter use and CLABICS episodes was conducted. Data were obtained via regular on-site visits made 3 times a week. Trends over time were estimated by Poisson regression, and risk factor analysis was conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression., Results: In all, 1,124 neonates were exposed to 2,210 central lines for a total of 12,746 catheter-days and 11,467 catheter-days at risk. The median duration of catheter use was 8 (interquartile range, 5-11) days for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 4 (interquartile range, 2-6) days for umbilical catheters; 102 CLABICS episodes were detected. The median time to infection was 7 days. Incidence densities were 8.5 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter-days at risk and 8.0 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter-days. The highest rates were identified among neonates weighing 750 g or lower (14.9 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter days at risk) and for PICCs (13.2 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter days at risk). Catheter dwell time was associated with CLABICS for all umbilical catheters (odds ratio [OR], 1.2 per day of use [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1-1.3]; P < .001) and for PICCs for up to 7 days (OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.4]; P = .041), but not thereafter (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.9-1.1]; P = .90)., Conclusion: Catheter dwell time is a risk factor for CLABICS during the first 7 days, irrespective of catheter type. After 7 days, PICCs are less likely to become infected.

To control an outbreak of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) in a neonatology unit, an investigation was conducted that involved screening neonates and parents, molecular analysis of MRSA isolates and long-term follow-up of cases. During a two-month period in the summer of 2000, Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing CA-MRSA (strain ST5-MRSA-IV) was detected in five neonates. The mother of the index caseshowed signs of mastitis and wound infection and consequently tested positive for CA-MRSA. A small cluster of endemic, PVL-negative MRSA strains (ST228-MRSA-I) occurred in parallel. Enhanced hygiene measures, barrier precautions, topical decolonization of carriers, and cohorting of new admissions terminated the outbreak. Four months after the outbreak, the mother of another neonate developed furunculosis with the epidemic CA-MRSA strain. One infant had persistent CA-MRSA carriage resulting in skin infection in a sibling four years after the outbreak. In conclusion, an epidemic CA-MRSA strain was introduced by the mother of the index case. This spread among neonates and was subsequently transmitted to another mother and a sibling. This is the first report of a successfully controlled neonatology outbreak of genetically distinct PVL-producing CA-MRSA in Europe.

Objective: To evaluate the dynamics of bacterial contamination of healthcare workers' (HCWs) hands during neonatal care., Setting: The 20-bed neonatal unit of a large acute care teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland., Methods: Structured observation sessions were conducted. A sequence of care began when the HCW performed hand hygiene and ended when the activity changed or hand hygiene was performed again. Alcohol-based handrub was the standard procedure for hand hygiene. An imprint of the five fingertips of the dominant hand was obtained before and after hand hygiene and at the end of a sequence of care. Regression methods were used to model the final bacterial count according to the type and duration of care and the use of gloves., Results: One hundred forty-nine sequences of care were observed. Commensal skin flora comprised 72.4% of all culture-positive specimens (n = 360). Other microorganisms identified were Enterobacteriaceae (n = 55, 13.8%); Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10, 2.5%); and fungi (n = 7, 1.8%). Skin contact, respiratory care, and diaper change were independently associated with an increased bacterial count; the use of gloves did not fully protect HCWs' hands from bacterial contamination., Conclusions: These data confirm that hands become progressively contaminated with commensal flora and potential pathogens during neonatal care, and identify activities at higher risk for hand contamination. They also reinforce the need for hand hygiene after a sequence of care, before starting a different task, and after glove removal.

Objective: To determine the influence of using different denominators on risk estimates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)., Design and Setting: Prospective cohort study in the medical ICU of a large teaching hospital., Patients: All consecutive patients admitted for more than 48 h between October 1995 and November 1997., Measurements and Results: We recorded all ICU-acquired infections using modified CDC criteria. VAP rates were reported per 1,000 patient-days, patient-days at risk, ventilator-days, and ventilator-days at risk. Of the 1,068 patients admitted, VAP developed in 106 (23.5%) of those mechanically ventilated. The incidence of the first episode of VAP was 22.8 per 1,000 patient-days (95% CI 18.7-27.6), 29.6 per 1,000 patient-days at risk (24.2-35.8), 35.7 per 1,000 ventilator-days (29.2-43.2), and 44.0 per 1,000 ventilator-days at risk (36.0-53.2). When considering all episodes of VAP (n=127), infection rates were 27.3 episodes per 1,000 ICU patient-days (95% CI 22.6-32.1) and 42.8 episodes per 1,000 ventilator-days (35.3-50.2)., Conclusions: The method of reporting VAP rates has a significant impact on risk estimates. Accordingly, clinicians and hospital management in charge of patient-care policies should be aware of how to read and compare nosocomial infection rates.

Objective: To assess the added value of surveying patients after discharge from the intensive care unit., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Medical intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital., Patients: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit for 48 hrs or more from October 1995 to November 1997., Measurements and Main Results: We prospectively surveyed 1,068 patients during their intensive care unit stay and for 5 days after intensive care unit discharge. We detected 554 intensive care unit-acquired infections, yielding an infection rate of 70.7 per 1,000 patient days. Of these, only 31 infections (5.6%) in 27 patients were detected after intensive care unit discharge. If postdischarge surveillance was targeted on patients who had had a central vascular catheter while in the intensive care unit, only one infected patient would have been missed, but only 554 out of 889 would have been followed up (sensitivity, 96.2%; specificity, 38.7%; negative predictive value, 99.7%)., Conclusions: Surveillance of all patients discharged from the medical intensive care unit is not recommended, as it is resource demanding and allows the detection of few additional infections. However, targeted postdischarge surveillance could be a rational alternative, and selection criteria need to be refined and validated.

Background: Hand hygiene prevents cross infection in hospitals, but compliance with recommended instructions is commonly poor. We attempted to promote hand hygiene by implementing a hospital-wide programme, with special emphasis on bedside, alcohol-based hand disinfection. We measured nosocomial infections in parallel., Methods: We monitored the overall compliance with hand hygiene during routine patient care in a teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland, before and during implementation of a hand-hygiene campaign. Seven hospital-wide observational surveys were done twice yearly from December, 1994, to December, 1997. Secondary outcome measures were nosocomial infection rates, attack rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and consumption of handrub disinfectant., Findings: We observed more than 20,000 opportunities for hand hygiene. Compliance improved progressively from 48% in 1994, to 66% in 1997 (p<0.001). Although recourse to handwashing with soap and water remained stable, frequency of hand disinfection substantially increased during the study period (p<0.001). This result was unchanged after adjustment for known risk factors of poor adherence. Hand hygiene improved significantly among nurses and nursing assistants, but remained poor among doctors. During the same period, overall nosocomial infection decreased (prevalence of 16.9% in 1994 to 9.9% in 1998; p=0.04), MRSA transmission rates decreased (2.16 to 0.93 episodes per 10,000 patient-days; p<0.001), and the consumption of alcohol-based handrub solution increased from 3.5 to 15.4 L per 1000 patient-days between 1993 and 1998 (p<0.001)., Interpretation: The campaign produced a sustained improvement in compliance with hand hygiene, coinciding with a reduction of nosocomial infections and MRSA transmission. The promotion of bedside, antiseptic handrubs largely contributed to the increase in compliance.

Background: Intravascular devices are a leading cause of nosocomial infection. Specific prevention strategies and improved guidelines for the use of intravascular devices can decrease the rate of infection; however, the impact of a combination of these strategies on rates of vascular-access infection in intensive-care units (ICUs) is not known. We implemented a multiple-approach prevention programme to decrease the occurrence of vascular-access infection in an 18-bed medical ICU at a tertiary centre., Methods: 3154 critically ill patients, admitted between October, 1995, and November, 1997, were included in a cohort study with longitudinal assessment of an overall catheter-care policy targeted at the reduction of vascular-access infections and based on an educational campaign for vascular-access insertion and on device use and care. Incidence of ICU-acquired infections was measured by means of on-site surveillance., Findings: 613 infections occurred in 353 patients (19.4 infections per 100 admissions). The incidence density of exit-site catheter infection was 9.2 episodes per 1000 patient-days before the intervention, and 3.3 episodes per 1000 patient-days afterwards (relative risk 0.36 [95% CI 0.20-0.63]). Corresponding rates for bloodstream infection were 11.3 and 3.8 episodes per 1000 patient-days, respectively (0.33 [0.20-0.56]) due to decreased rates of both microbiologically documented infections and clinical sepsis. Rates of respiratory and urinary-tract infections remained unchanged, whereas those of skin or mucous-membrane infections decreased from 11.4 to 7.0 episodes per 1000 patient-days (0.62 [0.41-0.93]). Overall, the incidence of nosocomial infections decreased from 52.4 to 34.0 episodes per 1000 patient-days (0.65 [0.54-0.78])., Interpretation: A multiple-approach prevention strategy, targeted at the insertion and maintenance of vascular access, can decrease rates of vascular-access infections and can have a substantial impact on the overall incidence of ICU-acquired infections.

Background: Cross-transmission of microorganisms by the hands of health care workers is considered the main route of spread of nosocomial infections., Objective: To study the process of bacterial contamination of health care workers' hands during routine patient care in a large teaching hospital., Methods: Structured observations of 417 episodes of care were conducted by trained external observers (S.T. and V.S.). Each observation period started after a hand-cleansing procedure and ended when the health care worker proceeded to clean his or her hands or at the end of a coherent episode of care. At the end of each period of observation, an imprint of the 5 fingertips of the dominant hand was taken and bacterial colony counts were quantified. Regression methods were used to model the intensity of bacterial contamination as a function of method of hand cleansing, use of gloves during patient care, duration and type of care, and hospital ward., Results: Bacterial contamination increased linearly with time on ungloved hands during patient care (average, 16 colony-forming units [CFUs] per minute; 95% confidence interval, 11-21 CFUs per minute). Patient care activities independently (P<.05 for all) associated with higher contamination levels were direct patient contact, respiratory care, handling of body fluid secretions, and rupture in the sequence of patient care. Contamination levels varied with hospital location; the medical rehabilitation ward had higher levels (49 CFUs; P=.03) than did other wards. Finally, simple hand washing before patient care, without hand antisepsis, was also associated with higher colony counts (52 CFUs; P=.03)., Conclusions: The duration and type of patient care affect hand contamination. Furthermore, because hand antisepsis was superior to hand washing, intervention trials should explore the role of systematic hand antisepsis as a cornerstone of infection control to reduce cross-transmission in hospitals.