Search

Background: Pediatric intensive care patients represent a population at high risk for drug-related problems. There are few studies that compare the activity of clinical pharmacists between countries., Objective: To describe the drug-related problems identified and interventions by four pharmacists in a pediatric cardiac and intensive care unit., Setting: Four pediatric centers in France, Quebec, Switzerland and Belgium., Method: This was a six-month multicenter, descriptive and prospective study conducted from August 1, 2009 to January 31, 2010. Drug-related problems and clinical interventions were compiled from four pediatric centers in France, Quebec, Switzerland and Belgium. Data on patients, drugs, intervention, documentation, approval and estimated impact were compiled., Main Outcome Measure: Number and type of drug-related problems encountered in a large pediatric inpatient population., Results: A total of 996 interventions were recorded: 238 (24 %) in France, 278 (28 %) in Quebec, 351 (35 %) in Switzerland and 129 (13 %) in Belgium. These interventions targeted 270 patients (median 21 months old, 53 % male): 88 (33 %) in France, 56 (21 %) in Quebec, 57 (21 %) in Switzerland and 69 (26 %) in Belgium. The main drug-related problems were inappropriate administration technique (29 %), untreated indication (25 %) and supra-therapeutic dose (11 %). The pharmacists' interventions were mostly optimizing the mode of administration (22 %), dose adjustment (20 %) and therapeutic monitoring (16 %). The two major drug classes that led to interventions were anti-infectives for systemic use (23 %) and digestive system and metabolism drugs (22 %). Interventions mainly involved residents and all clinical staff (21 %). Among the 878 (88 %) proposed interventions requiring physician approval, 860 (98 %) were accepted., Conclusion: This descriptive study illustrates drug-related problems and the ability of clinical pharmacists to identify and resolve them in pediatric intensive care units in four French-speaking countries.

Background: Injectable lorazepam (IL) is marketed in many countries but in France is only available within the framework of a compassionate use program for refractory status epilepticus. This study aims to evaluate the differences of pediatric use and status of IL in the hospitals of the Mother-Child French-speaking Network (Réseau mère-enfant de la francophonie, i.e., RMEF)., Methods: Inclusion criteria are: firstly, RMEF member; secondly, one site per town; thirdly, all the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris hospitals. After a phone-recruitment in each selected hospital, a survey was sent by e-mail. The data collected concerned the number of beds in the hospital, the official status of IL, its place in the therapeutic strategy, in hospital consumption in 2008 (in milligram) and the therapeutic alternatives., Results: Among the 18 hospitals selected, 17 were contacted and 12 (70%) replied. IL is not marketed in Tunisia and Lebanon. In Switzerland, Canada and Belgium, IL is marketed and used in all the polled hospitals (6.2 to 48.0mg per bed). In France, only the Robert Debré Hospital uses it (3.2mg per bed). In the countries where it is marketed, IL was firstly prescribed for the studied indication. In the other countries, injectable diazepam was the first line treatment (six out of eight hospitals)., Discussion/conclusion: France is the only country where IL is available though not marketed. The pharmacokinetic data favor use of IL instead of its principal therapeutic alternative (injectable diazepam) but no currently available evidence concludes that IL is superior to diazepam in the management of pediatric status epilepticus. The official indication of IL in France (last intention) is in contradiction with its use in the countries where it is marketed and with the data of the literature in favor of the first intention. This works presents the first evaluation on the use of IL in pediatric status epilepticus in the RMEF hospitals. It highlights the discrepancies in the management of status epilepticus in comparable pediatric hospitals., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)