Search

Objective: We surveyed urologists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland regarding their standard approach to prostate biopsy., Methods: Participants of Austrian and German urological meetings were asked to fill out a survey form; additionally, this was mailed to all Swiss urologists., Results: 304 surveys are available for analysis. 97% of participants perform a biopsy if digital rectal examination is abnormal. 63% use 4 ng/ml PSA (prostate-specific antigen) as cut-off. Age-related reference ranges are used by 54%, free PSA by 57%. 22% use PSA density, 55% PSA velocity. Overall 61% require a written consent, with 85, 86 and 25% in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. 96% of the urologists prescribe a quinolone antibiotic with a wide range regarding the start and end of drug therapy. 77% offer some kind of anaesthesia. Periprostatic injection of a local anaesthetic drug is used by 36%, lidocaine gel by 27%. 91% perform the biopsies transrectally under ultrasound guidance. Digitally guided biopsies are used by 11%. Only 3 participants perform perineal biopsies. The mean number of cores per biopsy session is 9.2, the maximum number of cores is 15.3 as a mean. Participants will stop performing any further biopsies if the patient already had a mean of 3.5 biopsy sessions., Conclusions: The majority of urologists in Central Europe prescribe a quinolone antibiotic and recommend some type of analgesia. The majority has abandoned the sextant technique and increases the number of cores in the case of rebiopsy. Biopsies are stopped after a mean of 3.5 sessions.

Most geriatric assessment instruments have been developed in the English language. Translated versions might differ in their psychometric properties. We analyzed the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of a German instrument for multidimensional geriatric assessment that was based on a newly developed English version. A group of 100 over 75-year-old community-dwelling persons (mean age 83.0 years, 81% women) in Hamburg (n = 26) and Ulm (n = 51), Germany, and Berne (n = 23), Switzerland was interviewed twice by the same trained interviewers with a one week interval. We administered questions on general health, chronic disorders, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, nutrition, falls, pain, the social support/network and preventive care measures. In addition, the Functional Status Questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index, the Visual Function Questionnaire, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Cohen's kappa was good to excellent (0.64 < or = kappa < or = 0.89) with only three exceptions (pain questions, kappa = 0.53; questions on preventive care services, kappa = 0.51; and one of the questions on recent falls, kappa = 0.44). Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) was good to excellent for all domains (0.76 < or = alpha < or = 0.95). The study results confirm good test-retest reliability of the German version of this multidimensional geriatric assessment instrument. Adapted versions of this instrument can be used for different purposes, e.g., preventive home visits, outpatient geriatric assessments or epidemiological studies in older persons.