Search

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether adolescent elite female and male handball players with shoulder muscle weakness, deficits in shoulder rotation range of motion (ROM) or in joint position sense (JPS), or scapular dyskinesis in the preseason had a higher rate of new shoulder injuries compared to players without these characteristics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: We studied 344 uninjured players (452 player-seasons, 50% female). We measured their shoulder strength in isometric external rotation (1ER), isometric internal rotation (HR), isometric abduction, and eccentric external rotation, as well as their shoulder ROM, JPS, and scapular dyskinesis, during the preseason. Players were monitored weekly regarding match and training hours and shoulder injuries during 1 or 2 seasons. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard rate ratios related to the first Injury and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During 2 seasons, the participants reported 48 new shoulder injuries. In female players, the hazard rate ratio was 2.37 (95% Cl: 1.03,5.44) for 1ER weakness and 2.44 (95% Cl: 1.06, 5.51) for HR weakness. The hazard rate ratio was 0,85 (95% Cl: 0.39,1.83) for an lER/IIR ratio of less than 0.75 and 1.53 (95% Cl: 0.36,6.52) for scapular dyskinesis. In male players, the hazard rate ratio was 1,02 (95% Cl: 0.44,2.36) for 1ER weakness, 0.74 (95% Cl: 0.31,1.75) for HR weakness, 2.0 (95% Cl: 0.68, 5.92) for an IER/IIR ratio of less than 0.75, and 3.43 (95% Cl: 1,49,7.92) for scapular dyskinesis. There were no associations between new shoulder injuries and deficits in ROM or JPS. CONCLUSION: In adolescent elite handball, male players with preseason scapular dyskinesis and female players with preseason HR or 1ER shoulder weakness had an increased shoulder injury rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate how well the virtual psychophysical measures of spatial hearing from the preliminary auditory profile predict self-reported spatial-hearing abilities., Design: Virtual spatial-hearings tests (conducted unaided, via headphones) and a questionnaire were administered in five centres in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Correlations and stepwise linear regression models were calculated among a group of hearing-impaired listeners., Study Sample: Thirty normal-hearing listeners aged 19-39 years, and 72 hearing-impaired listeners aged 22-91 years with a broad range of hearing losses, including asymmetrical and mixed hearing losses., Results: Several significant correlations (between 0.24 and 0.54) were found between results of virtual psychophysical spatial-hearing tests and self-reported localization abilities. Stepwise linear regression analyses showed that the minimum audible angle (MAA) test was a significant predictor for self-reported localization abilities (5% extra explained variance), and the spatial speech reception threshold (SRT) benefit test for self-reported listening to speech in spatial situations (6% extra explained variance)., Conclusions: The MAA test and spatial SRT benefit test are indicative measures of everyday binaural functioning. The binaural SRT benefit test was not found to predict self-reported spatial-hearing abilities.